The Tempo and Mode of Three‐Dimensional Morphological Evolution in Male Reproductive Structures
暂无分享,去创建一个
Hany Farid | Mark A. McPeek | M. McPeek | H. Farid | Li Shen | Li Shen | John Z. Torrey | J. Torrey
[1] T. Dobzhansky. Speciation as a Stage in Evolutionary Divergence , 1940, The American Naturalist.
[2] C. Simon,et al. CONVERGENT EVOLUTION OF COURTSHIP SONGS AMONG CRYPTIC SPECIES OF THE CARNEA GROUP OF GREEN LACEWINGS (NEUROPTERA: CHRYSOPIDAE: CHRYSOPERLA) , 1999, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[3] P. Wirtz. Mother species–father species: unidirectional hybridization in animals with female choice , 1999, Animal Behaviour.
[4] O. Fincke. Conflict resolution in the Odonata: implications for understanding female mating patterns and female choice , 1997 .
[5] H. Paterson,et al. MATE RECOGNITION AND MECHANICAL ISOLATION IN ENALLAGMA DAMSELFLIES (ODONATA: COENAGRIONIDAE) , 1982, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[6] J. Sved. A two-sex polygenic model for the evolution of premating isolation. I. Deterministic theory for natural populations. , 1981, Genetics.
[7] E. H. Bryant,et al. A direct experimental test of founder‐flush effects on the evolutionary potential for assortative mating , 2003, Journal of evolutionary biology.
[8] M. Pagel. Inferring evolutionary processes from phylogenies , 1997 .
[9] G. Grether. INTRASEXUAL COMPETITION ALONE FAVORS A SEXUALLY DIMORPHIC ORNAMENT IN THE RUBYSPOT DAMSELFLY HETAERINA AMERICANA , 1996, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[10] Dobzhansk y. GENETICS AND THE ORIGIN OF SPECIES , 1940 .
[11] R. Meldola. Sexual Selection , 1871, Nature.
[12] S. Gavrilets. Rapid evolution of reproductive barriers driven by sexual conflict , 2000, Nature.
[13] M. McPeek,et al. A phylogenetic perspective on habitat shifts and diversity in the North American Enallagma damselflies. , 2000, Systematic biology.
[14] Didier H. Besset. Object-Oriented Implementation of Selected Numerical Methods: An Introduction with Java and Smalltalk , 2000 .
[15] D. Fairbairn,et al. THE FORM OF SEXUAL SELECTION ON MALE GENITALIA CANNOT BE INFERRED FROM WITHIN-POPULATION VARIANCE AND ALLOMETRY—A CASE STUDY IN AQUARIUS REMIGIS , 2007, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[16] William J. Wilson,et al. Multivariate Statistical Methods , 2005, Technometrics.
[17] M. McPeek,et al. BUILDING A REGIONAL SPECIES POOL: DIVERSIFICATION OF THE ENALLAGMA DAMSELFLIES IN EASTERN NORTH AMERICA , 2000 .
[18] W. Koenig. Levels of Female Choice in the White-Tailed Skimmer Plathemis Lydia (Odonata: Libellulidae) , 1991 .
[19] M. Higgie,et al. Reinforcement drives rapid allopatric speciation , 2005, Nature.
[20] B. Crespi,et al. ADAPTIVE GAMETE-RECOGNITION DIVERGENCE IN A HYBRIDIZING Mytilus POPULATION , 2007, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[21] T. Garland,et al. Polytomies in Comparative Analyses of Continuous Characters , 1993 .
[22] M. McPeek. DETERMINATION OF SPECIES COMPOSITION IN THE ENALLAGMA DAMSELFLY ASSEMBLAGES OF PERMANENT LAKES , 1990 .
[23] R. Bonduriansky. ORIGINAL ARTICLE doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00081.x SEXUAL SELECTION AND ALLOMETRY: A CRITICAL REAPPRAISAL OF THE EVIDENCE AND IDEAS , 2006 .
[24] A. Fargevieille,et al. Lack of innate preference for morph and species identity in mate-searching Enallagma damselflies , 2007, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[25] M. McPeek,et al. Simultaneous Quaternary Radiations of Three Damselfly Clades across the Holarctic , 2005, The American Naturalist.
[26] J. Losos,et al. THE EFFECT OF INTRASPECIFIC SAMPLE SIZE ON TYPE I AND TYPE II ERROR RATES IN COMPARATIVE STUDIES , 2005, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[27] M. Mönkkönen,et al. Genital variation within and between three closely related Euxoa moth species: testing the lock‐and‐key hypothesis , 2006 .
[28] H. Paterson. More evidence against speciation by reinforcement , 1978 .
[29] M. Noor,et al. Speciation genetics: evolving approaches , 2006, Nature Reviews Genetics.
[30] J. Sved. A Two-Sex Polygenic Model for the Evolution of Premating Isolation. II. Computer Simulation of Experimental Selection Procedures. , 1981, Genetics.
[31] D. Fairbairn,et al. One tool, many uses: precopulatory sexual selection on genital morphology in Aquarius remigis , 2005, Journal of evolutionary biology.
[32] M. McPeek,et al. EVOLUTION OF PREY BEHAVIOR IN RESPONSE TO CHANGES IN PREDATION REGIME: DAMSELFLIES IN FISH AND DRAGONFLY LAKES , 2003, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[33] A. C. Rivera,et al. Sperm competition in Odonata (Insecta): the evolution of female sperm storage and rivals' sperm displacement , 2003 .
[34] M. McPeek. BIOCHEMICAL EVOLUTION ASSOCIATED WITH ANTIPREDATOR ADAPTATION IN DAMSELFLIES , 1999, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[35] M Kirkpatrick,et al. The reinforcement of mating preferences on an island. , 1999, Genetics.
[36] Michael J. Sanderson,et al. TESTING FOR DIFFERENT RATES OF CONTINUOUS TRAIT EVOLUTION USING LIKELIHOOD , 2006, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[37] T. Garland. Rate Tests for Phenotypic Evolution Using Phylogenetically Independent Contrasts , 1992, The American Naturalist.
[38] David W. Ritchie,et al. Fast computation, rotation, and comparison of low resolution spherical harmonic molecular surfaces , 1999, Journal of Computational Chemistry.
[39] M. McPeek. THE CONSEQUENCES OF CHANGING THE TOP PREDATOR IN A FOOD WEB: A COMPARATIVE EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH , 1998 .
[40] M. Kirkpatrick. Reinforcement and divergence under assortative mating , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[41] Steven M Phelps,et al. A Cognitive Framework for Mate Choice and Species Recognition , 2005, The American Naturalist.
[42] M. Noor,et al. Speciation by reinforcement: a model derived from studies of Drosophila. , 1996, Genetics.
[43] F J Rohlf,et al. COMPARATIVE METHODS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF CONTINUOUS VARIABLES: GEOMETRIC INTERPRETATIONS , 2001, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[44] Dennis R. Paulson. Damselflies of North America , 1997 .
[45] R. Stoks. Components of lifetime mating success and body size in males of a scrambling damselfly , 2000, Animal Behaviour.
[46] G. Arnqvist. The evolution of animal genitalia: distinguishing between hypotheses by single species studies , 1997 .
[47] J. Felsenstein. Phylogenies and the Comparative Method , 1985, The American Naturalist.
[48] C. Boake. Sexual Signaling and Speciation, a Microevolutionary Perspective , 2002, Genetica.
[49] G. Arnqvist,et al. Sexual conflict promotes speciation in insects. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[50] M. Blows. Interaction between natural and sexual selection during the evolution of mate recognition , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[51] L. Rowe,et al. Antagonistic coevolution between the sexes in a group of insects , 2002, Nature.
[52] O. Fincke. Underwater oviposition in a damselfly (Odonata: Coenagrionidae) favors male vigilance, and multiple mating by females , 1986, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[53] M. Kirkpatrick. Reinforcement during ecological speciation , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[54] M. McPeek. MORPHOLOGICAL EVOLUTION MEDIATED BY BEHAVIOR IN THE DAMSELFLIES OF TWO COMMUNITIES , 1995, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[55] M. Kirkpatrick. SEXUAL SELECTION AND THE EVOLUTION OF FEMALE CHOICE , 1982, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[56] T. Garland,et al. Procedures for the Analysis of Comparative Data Using Phylogenetically Independent Contrasts , 1992 .
[57] A. Córdoba‐Aguilar,et al. Sexual selection and animal genitalia. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[58] D. Hosken,et al. Sexual selection and genital evolution. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[59] C. Klingenberg,et al. A combined morphometric and phylogenetic analysis of an ecomorphological trend: pelagization in Antarctic fishes (Perciformes: Nototheniidae) , 1996 .
[60] D. Hosken,et al. Sexual conflict , 2005, Current Biology.
[61] W. Rice,et al. LABORATORY EXPERIMENTS ON SPECIATION: WHAT HAVE WE LEARNED IN 40 YEARS? , 1993, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[62] W. Eberhard. RAPID DIVERGENT EVOLUTION OF SEXUAL MORPHOLOGY: COMPARATIVE TESTS OF ANTAGONISTIC COEVOLUTION AND TRADITIONAL FEMALE CHOICE , 2004, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[63] M. McPeek,et al. THE EVOLUTION OF FEMALE MATING PREFERENCES: DIFFERENTIATION FROM SPECIES WITH PROMISCUOUS MALES CAN PROMOTE SPECIATION , 2006, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[64] T. Garland,et al. TESTING FOR PHYLOGENETIC SIGNAL IN COMPARATIVE DATA: BEHAVIORAL TRAITS ARE MORE LABILE , 2003, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[65] H. Paterson,et al. Evolution and the Recognition Concept of Species: Collected Writings , 1992 .
[66] H. Carl Gerhardt,et al. Acoustic spectral preferences in two cryptic species of grey treefrogs: implications for mate choice and sensory mechanisms , 2005, Animal Behaviour.
[67] D. Pfennig,et al. CHARACTER DISPLACEMENT AS THE “BEST OF A BAD SITUATION”: FITNESS TRADE-OFFS RESULTING FROM SELECTION TO MINIMIZE RESOURCE AND MATE COMPETITION , 2005, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[68] G. Arnqvist. Comparative evidence for the evolution of genitalia by sexual selection , 1998, Nature.
[69] G. Roderick,et al. Endless Forms – Species and Speciation , 2000, Heredity.
[70] R. Lande,et al. RAPID ORIGIN OF SEXUAL ISOLATION AND CHARACTER DIVERGENCE IN A CLINE , 1982, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[71] INTERSPECIFIC GENETICS OF MATE RECOGNITION: INHERITANCE OF FEMALE ACOUSTIC PREFERENCE IN HAWAIIAN CRICKETS , 2000, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[72] C. Boake,et al. On the Evolution of Premating Isolation after a Founder Event , 1998, The American Naturalist.
[73] J. Felsenstein. Maximum-likelihood estimation of evolutionary trees from continuous characters. , 1973, American journal of human genetics.
[74] N. Barton. Fitness Landscapes and the Origin of Species , 2004 .
[75] Ramón Díaz-Uriarte,et al. TESTING HYPOTHESES OF CORRELATED EVOLUTION USING PHYLOGENETICALLY INDEPENDENT CONTRASTS: SENSITIVITY TO DEVIATIONS FROM BROWNIAN MOTION , 1996 .
[76] M. McPeek,et al. PARALLEL EVOLUTION IN ECOLOGICAL AND REPRODUCTIVE TRAITS TO PRODUCE CRYPTIC DAMSELFLY SPECIES ACROSS THE HOLARCTIC , 2005, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[77] Fillia Makedon,et al. Spherical mapping for processing of 3D closed surfaces , 2006, Image Vis. Comput..
[78] Guido Gerig,et al. Parametrization of Closed Surfaces for 3-D Shape Description , 1995, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..
[79] T. Garland,et al. PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSES OF THE CORRELATED EVOLUTION OF CONTINUOUS CHARACTERS: A SIMULATION STUDY , 1991, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[80] D. Krakauer,et al. SEXUAL SELECTION, SPACE, AND SPECIATION , 1997, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[81] M. McPeek. The Growth/Predation Risk Trade‐Off: So What Is the Mechanism? , 2004, The American Naturalist.
[82] M. McPeek,et al. Adaptation to Predators in a New Community: Swimming Performance and Predator Avoidance in Damselflies , 1996 .
[83] Fillia Makedon,et al. Efficient Registration of 3D SPHARM Surfaces , 2007, Fourth Canadian Conference on Computer and Robot Vision (CRV '07).
[84] O. Fincke. Lifetime mating success in a natural population of the damselfly, Enallagma hageni (Walsh) (Odonata: Coenagrionidae) , 1982, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[85] O. Fincke,et al. LIFETIME REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS AND THE OPPORTUNITY FOR SELECTION IN A NONTERRITORIAL DAMSELFLY (ODONATA: COENAGRIONIDAE) , 1986, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[86] C. Randler. Avian hybridization, mixed pairing and female choice , 2002, Animal Behaviour.
[87] A. Templeton. ONCE AGAIN, WHY 300 SPECIES OF HAWAIIAN DROSOPHILA? , 1979, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[88] W. Swanson,et al. Reproductive Protein Evolution , 2002 .
[89] M. Pagel,et al. Phylogenetic Analysis and Comparative Data: A Test and Review of Evidence , 2002, The American Naturalist.
[90] Dennis R. Paulson. Reproductive isolation in Damselflies , 1974 .
[91] A. Shapiro,et al. THE LOCK-AND-KEY HYPOTHESIS: EVOLUTIONARY AND BIOSYSTEMATIC INTERPRETATION OF INSECT GENITALIA , 1989 .
[92] W. Eberhard. Sexual morphology of male Sepsis cynipsea (Diptera: Sepsidae): lack of support for lock-and-key and sexually antagonistic morphological coevolution hypotheses , 2005, The Canadian Entomologist.
[93] B. Huber. Rapid evolution and species-specificity of arthropod genitalia: fact or artifact? , 2003 .
[94] G. Grether,et al. SEXUAL SELECTION AND SURVIVAL SELECTION ON WING COLORATION AND BODY SIZE IN THE RUBYSPOT DAMSELFLY HETAERINA AMERICANA , 1996, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[95] T. Dobzhansky. Genetics and the Origin of Species , 1937 .
[96] M. Polihronakis. Morphometric Analysis of Intraspecific Shape Variation in Male and Female Genitalia of Phyllophaga hirticula (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Melolonthinae) , 2006 .
[97] W. Eberhard,et al. Interaction Between Sexually Antagonistic Selection and Mate Choice in the Evolution of Female Responses to Male Traits , 2005, Evolutionary Ecology.
[98] J. Waage. Dual Function of the Damselfly Penis: Sperm Removal and Transfer , 1979, Science.
[99] C. Boake,et al. Is sexual selection and species recognition a continuum? Mating behavior of the stalk-eyed fly Drosophila heteroneura. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[100] A. Templeton,et al. Genetic Revolutions in Relation to Speciation Phenomena: The Founding of New Populations , 1984 .
[101] M. McPeek. Testing Hypotheses About Evolutionary Change on Single Branches of a Phylogeny Using Evolutionary Contrasts , 1995, The American Naturalist.
[102] A. Córdoba‐Aguilar. Sensory Trap as the Mechanism of Sexual Selection in a Damselfly Genitalic Trait (Insecta: Calopterygidae) , 2002, The American Naturalist.
[103] M. Friberg,et al. EFFECTS OF NATURAL AND SEXUAL SELECTION ON ADAPTIVE POPULATION DIVERGENCE AND PREMATING ISOLATION IN A DAMSELFLY , 2006, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[104] Anthony R. Ives,et al. An Introduction to Phylogenetically Based Statistical Methods, with a New Method for Confidence Intervals on Ancestral Values , 1999 .
[105] R. Lande. Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[106] T. F. Hansen,et al. TRANSLATING BETWEEN MICROEVOLUTIONARY PROCESS AND MACROEVOLUTIONARY PATTERNS: THE CORRELATION STRUCTURE OF INTERSPECIFIC DATA , 1996, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[107] M. McPeek,et al. A Tale of Two Diversifications: Reciprocal Habitat Shifts to Fill Ecological Space along the Pond Permanence Gradient , 2006, The American Naturalist.
[108] S. Castellano,et al. Reconciling sexual selection to species recognition: a process-based model of mating decision. , 2006, Journal of theoretical biology.
[109] O. Fincke. Sperm competition in the damselfly Enallagma hageni Walsh (Odonata: Coenagrionidae): benefits of multiple mating to males and females , 1984, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[110] M. Pagel. Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution , 1999, Nature.