The Tempo and Mode of Three‐Dimensional Morphological Evolution in Male Reproductive Structures

Various evolutionary forces may shape the evolution of traits that influence the mating decisions of males and females. Phenotypic traits that males and females use to judge the species identify of potential mates should evolve in a punctuated fashion, changing significantly at the time of speciation but changing little between speciation events. In contrast, traits experiencing sexual selection or sexually antagonistic interactions are generally expected to change continuously over time because of the directional selection pressures imposed on one sex by the actions of the other. To test these hypotheses, we used spherical harmonic representations of the shapes of male mating structures in reconstructions of the evolutionary tempo of these structures across the history of the Enallagma damselfly clade. Our analyses show that the evolution of these structures is completely consistent with a punctuated model of evolutionary change and a constant evolutionary rate throughout the clade’s history. In addition, no interpopulation variation in shape was detected across the range of one species. These results indicate that male mating structures in this genus are used primarily for identifying the species of potential mates and experience little or no selection from intraspecific sexual selection or sexual antagonism. The implications of these results for speciation are discussed.

[1]  T. Dobzhansky Speciation as a Stage in Evolutionary Divergence , 1940, The American Naturalist.

[2]  C. Simon,et al.  CONVERGENT EVOLUTION OF COURTSHIP SONGS AMONG CRYPTIC SPECIES OF THE CARNEA GROUP OF GREEN LACEWINGS (NEUROPTERA: CHRYSOPIDAE: CHRYSOPERLA) , 1999, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[3]  P. Wirtz Mother species–father species: unidirectional hybridization in animals with female choice , 1999, Animal Behaviour.

[4]  O. Fincke Conflict resolution in the Odonata: implications for understanding female mating patterns and female choice , 1997 .

[5]  H. Paterson,et al.  MATE RECOGNITION AND MECHANICAL ISOLATION IN ENALLAGMA DAMSELFLIES (ODONATA: COENAGRIONIDAE) , 1982, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[6]  J. Sved A two-sex polygenic model for the evolution of premating isolation. I. Deterministic theory for natural populations. , 1981, Genetics.

[7]  E. H. Bryant,et al.  A direct experimental test of founder‐flush effects on the evolutionary potential for assortative mating , 2003, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[8]  M. Pagel Inferring evolutionary processes from phylogenies , 1997 .

[9]  G. Grether INTRASEXUAL COMPETITION ALONE FAVORS A SEXUALLY DIMORPHIC ORNAMENT IN THE RUBYSPOT DAMSELFLY HETAERINA AMERICANA , 1996, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[10]  Dobzhansk y GENETICS AND THE ORIGIN OF SPECIES , 1940 .

[11]  R. Meldola Sexual Selection , 1871, Nature.

[12]  S. Gavrilets Rapid evolution of reproductive barriers driven by sexual conflict , 2000, Nature.

[13]  M. McPeek,et al.  A phylogenetic perspective on habitat shifts and diversity in the North American Enallagma damselflies. , 2000, Systematic biology.

[14]  Didier H. Besset Object-Oriented Implementation of Selected Numerical Methods: An Introduction with Java and Smalltalk , 2000 .

[15]  D. Fairbairn,et al.  THE FORM OF SEXUAL SELECTION ON MALE GENITALIA CANNOT BE INFERRED FROM WITHIN-POPULATION VARIANCE AND ALLOMETRY—A CASE STUDY IN AQUARIUS REMIGIS , 2007, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[16]  William J. Wilson,et al.  Multivariate Statistical Methods , 2005, Technometrics.

[17]  M. McPeek,et al.  BUILDING A REGIONAL SPECIES POOL: DIVERSIFICATION OF THE ENALLAGMA DAMSELFLIES IN EASTERN NORTH AMERICA , 2000 .

[18]  W. Koenig Levels of Female Choice in the White-Tailed Skimmer Plathemis Lydia (Odonata: Libellulidae) , 1991 .

[19]  M. Higgie,et al.  Reinforcement drives rapid allopatric speciation , 2005, Nature.

[20]  B. Crespi,et al.  ADAPTIVE GAMETE-RECOGNITION DIVERGENCE IN A HYBRIDIZING Mytilus POPULATION , 2007, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[21]  T. Garland,et al.  Polytomies in Comparative Analyses of Continuous Characters , 1993 .

[22]  M. McPeek DETERMINATION OF SPECIES COMPOSITION IN THE ENALLAGMA DAMSELFLY ASSEMBLAGES OF PERMANENT LAKES , 1990 .

[23]  R. Bonduriansky ORIGINAL ARTICLE doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00081.x SEXUAL SELECTION AND ALLOMETRY: A CRITICAL REAPPRAISAL OF THE EVIDENCE AND IDEAS , 2006 .

[24]  A. Fargevieille,et al.  Lack of innate preference for morph and species identity in mate-searching Enallagma damselflies , 2007, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[25]  M. McPeek,et al.  Simultaneous Quaternary Radiations of Three Damselfly Clades across the Holarctic , 2005, The American Naturalist.

[26]  J. Losos,et al.  THE EFFECT OF INTRASPECIFIC SAMPLE SIZE ON TYPE I AND TYPE II ERROR RATES IN COMPARATIVE STUDIES , 2005, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[27]  M. Mönkkönen,et al.  Genital variation within and between three closely related Euxoa moth species: testing the lock‐and‐key hypothesis , 2006 .

[28]  H. Paterson More evidence against speciation by reinforcement , 1978 .

[29]  M. Noor,et al.  Speciation genetics: evolving approaches , 2006, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[30]  J. Sved A Two-Sex Polygenic Model for the Evolution of Premating Isolation. II. Computer Simulation of Experimental Selection Procedures. , 1981, Genetics.

[31]  D. Fairbairn,et al.  One tool, many uses: precopulatory sexual selection on genital morphology in Aquarius remigis , 2005, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[32]  M. McPeek,et al.  EVOLUTION OF PREY BEHAVIOR IN RESPONSE TO CHANGES IN PREDATION REGIME: DAMSELFLIES IN FISH AND DRAGONFLY LAKES , 2003, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[33]  A. C. Rivera,et al.  Sperm competition in Odonata (Insecta): the evolution of female sperm storage and rivals' sperm displacement , 2003 .

[34]  M. McPeek BIOCHEMICAL EVOLUTION ASSOCIATED WITH ANTIPREDATOR ADAPTATION IN DAMSELFLIES , 1999, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[35]  M Kirkpatrick,et al.  The reinforcement of mating preferences on an island. , 1999, Genetics.

[36]  Michael J. Sanderson,et al.  TESTING FOR DIFFERENT RATES OF CONTINUOUS TRAIT EVOLUTION USING LIKELIHOOD , 2006, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[37]  T. Garland Rate Tests for Phenotypic Evolution Using Phylogenetically Independent Contrasts , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[38]  David W. Ritchie,et al.  Fast computation, rotation, and comparison of low resolution spherical harmonic molecular surfaces , 1999, Journal of Computational Chemistry.

[39]  M. McPeek THE CONSEQUENCES OF CHANGING THE TOP PREDATOR IN A FOOD WEB: A COMPARATIVE EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH , 1998 .

[40]  M. Kirkpatrick Reinforcement and divergence under assortative mating , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[41]  Steven M Phelps,et al.  A Cognitive Framework for Mate Choice and Species Recognition , 2005, The American Naturalist.

[42]  M. Noor,et al.  Speciation by reinforcement: a model derived from studies of Drosophila. , 1996, Genetics.

[43]  F J Rohlf,et al.  COMPARATIVE METHODS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF CONTINUOUS VARIABLES: GEOMETRIC INTERPRETATIONS , 2001, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[44]  Dennis R. Paulson Damselflies of North America , 1997 .

[45]  R. Stoks Components of lifetime mating success and body size in males of a scrambling damselfly , 2000, Animal Behaviour.

[46]  G. Arnqvist The evolution of animal genitalia: distinguishing between hypotheses by single species studies , 1997 .

[47]  J. Felsenstein Phylogenies and the Comparative Method , 1985, The American Naturalist.

[48]  C. Boake Sexual Signaling and Speciation, a Microevolutionary Perspective , 2002, Genetica.

[49]  G. Arnqvist,et al.  Sexual conflict promotes speciation in insects. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[50]  M. Blows Interaction between natural and sexual selection during the evolution of mate recognition , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[51]  L. Rowe,et al.  Antagonistic coevolution between the sexes in a group of insects , 2002, Nature.

[52]  O. Fincke Underwater oviposition in a damselfly (Odonata: Coenagrionidae) favors male vigilance, and multiple mating by females , 1986, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[53]  M. Kirkpatrick Reinforcement during ecological speciation , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[54]  M. McPeek MORPHOLOGICAL EVOLUTION MEDIATED BY BEHAVIOR IN THE DAMSELFLIES OF TWO COMMUNITIES , 1995, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[55]  M. Kirkpatrick SEXUAL SELECTION AND THE EVOLUTION OF FEMALE CHOICE , 1982, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[56]  T. Garland,et al.  Procedures for the Analysis of Comparative Data Using Phylogenetically Independent Contrasts , 1992 .

[57]  A. Córdoba‐Aguilar,et al.  Sexual selection and animal genitalia. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[58]  D. Hosken,et al.  Sexual selection and genital evolution. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[59]  C. Klingenberg,et al.  A combined morphometric and phylogenetic analysis of an ecomorphological trend: pelagization in Antarctic fishes (Perciformes: Nototheniidae) , 1996 .

[60]  D. Hosken,et al.  Sexual conflict , 2005, Current Biology.

[61]  W. Rice,et al.  LABORATORY EXPERIMENTS ON SPECIATION: WHAT HAVE WE LEARNED IN 40 YEARS? , 1993, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[62]  W. Eberhard RAPID DIVERGENT EVOLUTION OF SEXUAL MORPHOLOGY: COMPARATIVE TESTS OF ANTAGONISTIC COEVOLUTION AND TRADITIONAL FEMALE CHOICE , 2004, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[63]  M. McPeek,et al.  THE EVOLUTION OF FEMALE MATING PREFERENCES: DIFFERENTIATION FROM SPECIES WITH PROMISCUOUS MALES CAN PROMOTE SPECIATION , 2006, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[64]  T. Garland,et al.  TESTING FOR PHYLOGENETIC SIGNAL IN COMPARATIVE DATA: BEHAVIORAL TRAITS ARE MORE LABILE , 2003, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[65]  H. Paterson,et al.  Evolution and the Recognition Concept of Species: Collected Writings , 1992 .

[66]  H. Carl Gerhardt,et al.  Acoustic spectral preferences in two cryptic species of grey treefrogs: implications for mate choice and sensory mechanisms , 2005, Animal Behaviour.

[67]  D. Pfennig,et al.  CHARACTER DISPLACEMENT AS THE “BEST OF A BAD SITUATION”: FITNESS TRADE-OFFS RESULTING FROM SELECTION TO MINIMIZE RESOURCE AND MATE COMPETITION , 2005, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[68]  G. Arnqvist Comparative evidence for the evolution of genitalia by sexual selection , 1998, Nature.

[69]  G. Roderick,et al.  Endless Forms – Species and Speciation , 2000, Heredity.

[70]  R. Lande,et al.  RAPID ORIGIN OF SEXUAL ISOLATION AND CHARACTER DIVERGENCE IN A CLINE , 1982, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[71]  INTERSPECIFIC GENETICS OF MATE RECOGNITION: INHERITANCE OF FEMALE ACOUSTIC PREFERENCE IN HAWAIIAN CRICKETS , 2000, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[72]  C. Boake,et al.  On the Evolution of Premating Isolation after a Founder Event , 1998, The American Naturalist.

[73]  J. Felsenstein Maximum-likelihood estimation of evolutionary trees from continuous characters. , 1973, American journal of human genetics.

[74]  N. Barton Fitness Landscapes and the Origin of Species , 2004 .

[75]  Ramón Díaz-Uriarte,et al.  TESTING HYPOTHESES OF CORRELATED EVOLUTION USING PHYLOGENETICALLY INDEPENDENT CONTRASTS: SENSITIVITY TO DEVIATIONS FROM BROWNIAN MOTION , 1996 .

[76]  M. McPeek,et al.  PARALLEL EVOLUTION IN ECOLOGICAL AND REPRODUCTIVE TRAITS TO PRODUCE CRYPTIC DAMSELFLY SPECIES ACROSS THE HOLARCTIC , 2005, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[77]  Fillia Makedon,et al.  Spherical mapping for processing of 3D closed surfaces , 2006, Image Vis. Comput..

[78]  Guido Gerig,et al.  Parametrization of Closed Surfaces for 3-D Shape Description , 1995, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[79]  T. Garland,et al.  PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSES OF THE CORRELATED EVOLUTION OF CONTINUOUS CHARACTERS: A SIMULATION STUDY , 1991, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[80]  D. Krakauer,et al.  SEXUAL SELECTION, SPACE, AND SPECIATION , 1997, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[81]  M. McPeek The Growth/Predation Risk Trade‐Off: So What Is the Mechanism? , 2004, The American Naturalist.

[82]  M. McPeek,et al.  Adaptation to Predators in a New Community: Swimming Performance and Predator Avoidance in Damselflies , 1996 .

[83]  Fillia Makedon,et al.  Efficient Registration of 3D SPHARM Surfaces , 2007, Fourth Canadian Conference on Computer and Robot Vision (CRV '07).

[84]  O. Fincke Lifetime mating success in a natural population of the damselfly, Enallagma hageni (Walsh) (Odonata: Coenagrionidae) , 1982, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[85]  O. Fincke,et al.  LIFETIME REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS AND THE OPPORTUNITY FOR SELECTION IN A NONTERRITORIAL DAMSELFLY (ODONATA: COENAGRIONIDAE) , 1986, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[86]  C. Randler Avian hybridization, mixed pairing and female choice , 2002, Animal Behaviour.

[87]  A. Templeton ONCE AGAIN, WHY 300 SPECIES OF HAWAIIAN DROSOPHILA? , 1979, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[88]  W. Swanson,et al.  Reproductive Protein Evolution , 2002 .

[89]  M. Pagel,et al.  Phylogenetic Analysis and Comparative Data: A Test and Review of Evidence , 2002, The American Naturalist.

[90]  Dennis R. Paulson Reproductive isolation in Damselflies , 1974 .

[91]  A. Shapiro,et al.  THE LOCK-AND-KEY HYPOTHESIS: EVOLUTIONARY AND BIOSYSTEMATIC INTERPRETATION OF INSECT GENITALIA , 1989 .

[92]  W. Eberhard Sexual morphology of male Sepsis cynipsea (Diptera: Sepsidae): lack of support for lock-and-key and sexually antagonistic morphological coevolution hypotheses , 2005, The Canadian Entomologist.

[93]  B. Huber Rapid evolution and species-specificity of arthropod genitalia: fact or artifact? , 2003 .

[94]  G. Grether,et al.  SEXUAL SELECTION AND SURVIVAL SELECTION ON WING COLORATION AND BODY SIZE IN THE RUBYSPOT DAMSELFLY HETAERINA AMERICANA , 1996, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[95]  T. Dobzhansky Genetics and the Origin of Species , 1937 .

[96]  M. Polihronakis Morphometric Analysis of Intraspecific Shape Variation in Male and Female Genitalia of Phyllophaga hirticula (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Melolonthinae) , 2006 .

[97]  W. Eberhard,et al.  Interaction Between Sexually Antagonistic Selection and Mate Choice in the Evolution of Female Responses to Male Traits , 2005, Evolutionary Ecology.

[98]  J. Waage Dual Function of the Damselfly Penis: Sperm Removal and Transfer , 1979, Science.

[99]  C. Boake,et al.  Is sexual selection and species recognition a continuum? Mating behavior of the stalk-eyed fly Drosophila heteroneura. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[100]  A. Templeton,et al.  Genetic Revolutions in Relation to Speciation Phenomena: The Founding of New Populations , 1984 .

[101]  M. McPeek Testing Hypotheses About Evolutionary Change on Single Branches of a Phylogeny Using Evolutionary Contrasts , 1995, The American Naturalist.

[102]  A. Córdoba‐Aguilar Sensory Trap as the Mechanism of Sexual Selection in a Damselfly Genitalic Trait (Insecta: Calopterygidae) , 2002, The American Naturalist.

[103]  M. Friberg,et al.  EFFECTS OF NATURAL AND SEXUAL SELECTION ON ADAPTIVE POPULATION DIVERGENCE AND PREMATING ISOLATION IN A DAMSELFLY , 2006, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[104]  Anthony R. Ives,et al.  An Introduction to Phylogenetically Based Statistical Methods, with a New Method for Confidence Intervals on Ancestral Values , 1999 .

[105]  R. Lande Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[106]  T. F. Hansen,et al.  TRANSLATING BETWEEN MICROEVOLUTIONARY PROCESS AND MACROEVOLUTIONARY PATTERNS: THE CORRELATION STRUCTURE OF INTERSPECIFIC DATA , 1996, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[107]  M. McPeek,et al.  A Tale of Two Diversifications: Reciprocal Habitat Shifts to Fill Ecological Space along the Pond Permanence Gradient , 2006, The American Naturalist.

[108]  S. Castellano,et al.  Reconciling sexual selection to species recognition: a process-based model of mating decision. , 2006, Journal of theoretical biology.

[109]  O. Fincke Sperm competition in the damselfly Enallagma hageni Walsh (Odonata: Coenagrionidae): benefits of multiple mating to males and females , 1984, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[110]  M. Pagel Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution , 1999, Nature.