A New Design Rationale Representation Model for Rationale Mining

The management of design rationale (DR) in engineering design is an important task since DR is often regarded as crucial information in design decision support and design analysis. The existing DR systems largely rely on human efforts in capturing DRs along design activities according to some predefined DR models. However, these systems require heavy human involvement and they do not have the capacity to extract DRs from design archival documents, which contain rich DR information but are usually unstructured or semistructured texts, e.g., design documents, service reports, and test reports. In view of such challenges, it has motivated us to propose a new DR model to intelligently discover DRs from design archival documents. In this paper, we propose an issue, solution and artifact layer (ISAL) model for DR representation and approaches for rationale information discovery from design archival documents. We also introduce a DR repository construction platform based on the ISAL model by integrating rationale information from both design archival documents and design processes. Using patent documents as our research data, we conduct a conceptual comparison and experimental study of DR discovery especially for artifact information extraction. Results demonstrate the merits of our proposal. Lastly, we discuss potential applications by taking advantage of our ISAL model.

[1]  Shaofeng Liu,et al.  A computational framework for retrieval of document fragments based on decomposition schemes in engineering information management , 2006, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[2]  Karthik Ramani,et al.  Ontology-based design information extraction and retrieval , 2007, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[3]  Shaofeng Liu,et al.  A review of structured document retrieval (SDR) technology to improve information access performance in engineering document management , 2008, Comput. Ind..

[4]  Rob H. Bracewell,et al.  A Framework for Design Rationale Retrieval , 2005 .

[5]  John M. Carroll,et al.  Design rationale: concepts, techniques, and use , 1996 .

[6]  William C. Regli,et al.  A Survey of Design Rationale Systems: Approaches, Representation, Capture and Retrieval , 2000, Engineering with Computers.

[7]  Roger Jianxin Jiao,et al.  Product portfolio identification based on association rule mining , 2005, Comput. Aided Des..

[8]  Han Tong Loh,et al.  Deriving Taxonomy from Documents at Sentence Level , 2008 .

[9]  Rakesh Nagi,et al.  A Data Mining Approach to Forming Generic Bills of Materials in Support of Variant Design Activities , 2004, J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng..

[10]  Michael E. Atwood,et al.  Effective Design Rationale: Understanding the Barriers , 2006 .

[11]  Tetsuya Nasukawa,et al.  Text analysis and knowledge mining system , 2001, IBM Syst. J..

[12]  Victor Raskin,et al.  Developing Engineering Ontology for Information Retrieval , 2008, J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng..

[13]  W Yu,et al.  Automatic identification of semantic relationships for manufacturing information management , 2008 .

[14]  Ann E. Nicholson,et al.  Using Bayesian belief networks for change impact analysis in architecture design , 2007, J. Syst. Softw..

[15]  Adriana Pereira de Medeiros,et al.  Kuaba approach: Integrating formal semantics and design rationale representation to support design reuse , 2008, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[16]  David C. Brown,et al.  Software Engineering Using RATionale , 2008, J. Syst. Softw..

[17]  Rob H. Bracewell,et al.  Capturing design rationale , 2009, Comput. Aided Des..

[18]  W. B. Lee,et al.  Multi-facet product information search and retrieval using semantically annotated product family ontology , 2010, Inf. Process. Manag..

[19]  Maarten Sierhuis,et al.  Hypermedia Support for Argumentation-Based Rationale , 2006 .

[20]  Andrew Dillon,et al.  Design rationale: Concepts, techniques, and use , 1997 .

[21]  Alice M. Agogino,et al.  Modeling Information Needs in Engineering Databases Using Tacit Knowledge , 2002, J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng..

[22]  Janet E. Burge,et al.  Design rationale: Researching under uncertainty , 2008, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[23]  Chao-Fu Hong,et al.  Extracting the significant-rare keywords for patent analysis , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[24]  Duen-Ren Liu,et al.  Mining Changes in Patent Trends for Competitive Intelligence , 2008, PAKDD.

[25]  Rada Mihalcea,et al.  TextRank: Bringing Order into Text , 2004, EMNLP.

[26]  Ying Liu,et al.  On Document Representation and Term Weights in Text Classification , 2009 .

[27]  Ashok K. Goel,et al.  Functional representation as design rationale , 1993, Computer.

[28]  David Pressman,et al.  Patent It Yourself , 1985 .

[29]  Raymond McCall PHI : A Conceptual Foundation For Design Hypermedia , 1990 .

[30]  Han Tong Loh,et al.  Gather customer concerns from online product reviews - A text summarization approach , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[31]  Jintae Lee The 1992 Workshop on Design Rationale Capture and Use , 1993, AI Mag..

[32]  Han Tong Loh,et al.  On macro- and micro-level information in multiple documents and its influence on summarization , 2009, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[33]  Jintae Lee,et al.  Design Rationale Systems: Understanding the Issues , 1997, IEEE Expert.

[34]  J. E. Fowler Variant design for mechanical artifacts: A state-of-the-art survey , 2005, Engineering with Computers.

[35]  Antony Tang,et al.  A rationale-based architecture model for design traceability and reasoning , 2007, J. Syst. Softw..

[36]  Richard M. Young,et al.  Options and Criteria: Elements of design space analysis , 1991 .

[37]  Pericles Loucopoulos,et al.  A generic model for reflective design , 2000, TSEM.