Changes of Brain Connectivity in the Primary Motor Cortex After Subcortical Stroke

AbstractThe authors investigated the changes in connectivity networks of the bilateral primary motor cortex (M1) of subcortical stroke patients using a multimodal neuroimaging approach with antiplatelet therapy. Nineteen patients were scanned at 2 time points: before and 1 month after the treatment. The authors assessed the resting-state functional connectivity (FC) and probabilistic fiber tracking of left and right M1 of every patient, and then compared these results to the 15 healthy controls. The authors also evaluated the correlations between the neuroimaging results and clinical scores.Compared with the controls, the patients showed a significant decrease of FC in the contralateral motor cortex before treatment, and the disrupted FC was restored after treatment. The fiber tracking results in the controls indicated that the body of the corpus callosum should be the main pathway connecting the M1 and contralateral hemispheres. All patients exhibited reduced probability of structural connectivity within this pathway before treatment and which was restored after treatment. Significant correlations were also found in these patients between the connectivity results and clinical scores, which might imply that the connectivity of M1 can be used to evaluate the motor skills in stroke patients.These findings can help elucidate the neural mechanisms responsible for the brain connectivity recovery after stroke.

[1]  O Sporns,et al.  Predicting human resting-state functional connectivity from structural connectivity , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  Edward T. Bullmore,et al.  The future of functional MRI in clinical medicine , 2012, NeuroImage.

[3]  Peter Langhorne,et al.  Barthel Index for Stroke Trials: Development, Properties, and Application , 2011, Stroke.

[4]  Hao Huang,et al.  DTI tractography based parcellation of white matter: Application to the mid-sagittal morphology of corpus callosum , 2005, NeuroImage.

[5]  Samuel Patz,et al.  Diffusion Tensor Imaging, White Matter Lesions, the Corpus Callosum, and Gait in the Elderly , 2009, Stroke.

[6]  J. Klein,et al.  Human Motor Corpus Callosum: Topography, Somatotopy, and Link between Microstructure and Function , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[7]  G. Fink,et al.  Reorganization of cerebral networks after stroke: new insights from neuroimaging with connectivity approaches , 2011, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[8]  G. Schlaug,et al.  Resting State Interhemispheric Motor Connectivity and White Matter Integrity Correlate with Motor Impairment in Chronic Stroke , 2013, Front. Neurol..

[9]  Heidi Johansen-Berg,et al.  Brain Activity Changes Associated With Treadmill Training After Stroke , 2009, Stroke.

[10]  Ichiro Watanabe,et al.  Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Contralesional Primary Motor Cortex Improves Hand Function After Stroke , 2005, Stroke.

[11]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Resting interhemispheric functional magnetic resonance imaging connectivity predicts performance after stroke , 2009, Annals of neurology.

[12]  Arno Villringer,et al.  The Value of Resting-State Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Stroke , 2014, Stroke.

[13]  Peter Langhorne,et al.  Reliability (Inter-rater Agreement) of the Barthel Index for Assessment of Stroke Survivors: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis , 2013, Stroke.

[14]  T. Olsen,et al.  Recovery of upper extremity function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. , 1994, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[15]  Desmond J. Higham,et al.  Network analysis detects changes in the contralesional hemisphere following stroke , 2011, NeuroImage.

[16]  Christian Grefkes,et al.  Cortical reorganization after stroke: how much and how functional? , 2015 .

[17]  M. Viergever,et al.  Recovery of Sensorimotor Function after Experimental Stroke Correlates with Restoration of Resting-State Interhemispheric Functional Connectivity , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[18]  Timothy H. Murphy,et al.  Stroke and the Connectome: How Connectivity Guides Therapeutic Intervention , 2014, Neuron.

[19]  Xue Wang,et al.  White matter microstructure changes induced by motor skill learning utilizing a body machine interface , 2014, NeuroImage.

[20]  J. Donoghue,et al.  Plasticity and primary motor cortex. , 2000, Annual review of neuroscience.

[21]  Wenhua Huang,et al.  The Microstructural Status of the Corpus Callosum Is Associated with the Degree of Motor Function and Neurological Deficit in Stroke Patients , 2015, PloS one.

[22]  Liang Wang,et al.  Dynamic functional reorganization of the motor execution network after stroke. , 2010, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[23]  Christian Grefkes,et al.  Cerebral network disorders after stroke: evidence from imaging‐based connectivity analyses of active and resting brain states in humans , 2013, The Journal of physiology.

[24]  Gereon R Fink,et al.  The role of the contralesional motor cortex for motor recovery in the early days after stroke assessed with longitudinal FMRI. , 2011, Cerebral cortex.

[25]  Abraham Z. Snyder,et al.  Upstream Dysfunction of Somatomotor Functional Connectivity After Corticospinal Damage in Stroke , 2012, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[26]  Arno Villringer,et al.  Longitudinal Effects of Lesions on Functional Networks after Stroke , 2013, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[27]  M. Schwab,et al.  Finding an optimal rehabilitation paradigm after stroke: enhancing fiber growth and training of the brain at the right moment , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[28]  J. Schaechter.  Motor rehabilitation and brain plasticity after hemiparetic stroke , 2004, Progress in Neurobiology.

[29]  Edward T. Bullmore,et al.  The relationship between motor deficit and hemisphere activation balance after stroke: A 3T fMRI study , 2007, NeuroImage.

[30]  G. Fink,et al.  Degeneration of corpus callosum and recovery of motor function after stroke: A multimodal magnetic resonance imaging study , 2012, Human brain mapping.

[31]  M UCHA UDABE,et al.  [The human motor]. , 1959, Prensa medica argentina.

[32]  Jens Frahm,et al.  Topography of the human corpus callosum revisited—Comprehensive fiber tractography using diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging , 2006, NeuroImage.

[33]  Robert Lindenberg,et al.  Predicting functional motor potential in chronic stroke patients using diffusion tensor imaging , 2012, Human brain mapping.

[34]  Hidenao Fukuyama,et al.  Motor recovery and microstructural change in rubro-spinal tract in subcortical stroke , 2013, NeuroImage: Clinical.

[35]  Leonardo G Cohen,et al.  Interhemispheric inhibition between primary motor cortices: what have we learned? , 2009, The Journal of physiology.

[36]  Maurizio Corbetta,et al.  Why use a connectivity-based approach to study stroke and recovery of function? , 2012, NeuroImage.

[37]  Chunshui Yu,et al.  Contribution of the Resting-State Functional Connectivity of the Contralesional Primary Sensorimotor Cortex to Motor Recovery after Subcortical Stroke , 2014, PloS one.

[38]  S. Black,et al.  The Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Motor Recovery after Stroke: A Critical Review of Its Measurement Properties , 2002, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[39]  Gereon R Fink,et al.  Effects of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the contralesional primary motor cortex on movement kinematics and neural activity in subcortical stroke. , 2008, Archives of neurology.

[40]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Probabilistic diffusion tractography with multiple fibre orientations: What can we gain? , 2007, NeuroImage.

[41]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Longitudinal Changes of Resting-State Functional Connectivity During Motor Recovery After Stroke , 2011, Stroke.