Development and Analysis of Higher Order Finite Volume Methods over Rectangles for Elliptic Equations

Currently used finite volume methods are essentially low order methods. In this paper, we present a systematic way to derive higher order finite volume schemes from higher order mixed finite element methods. Mostly for convenience but sometimes from necessity, our procedure starts from the hybridization of the mixed method. It then approximates the inner product of vector functions by an appropriate, critical quadrature rule; this allows the elimination of the flux and Lagrange multiplier parameters so as to obtain equations in the scalar variable, which will define the finite volume method. Following this derivation with different mixed finite element spaces leads to a variety of finite volume schemes. In particular, we restrict ourselves to finite volume methods posed over rectangular partitions and begin by studying an efficient second-order finite volume method based on the Brezzi–Douglas–Fortin–Marini space of index two. Then, we present a general global analysis of the difference between the solution of the underlying mixed finite element method and its related finite volume method. Then, we derive finite volume methods of all orders from the Raviart–Thomas two-dimensional rectangular elements; we also find finite volume methods to associate with BDFM2 three-dimensional rectangles. In each case, we obtain optimal error estimates for both the scalar variable and the recovered flux.

[1]  Zhiqiang Cai,et al.  The finite volume element method for diffusion equations on general triangulations , 1991 .

[2]  Zhiqiang Cai,et al.  On the finite volume element method , 1990 .

[3]  J. Maître,et al.  Connection between finite volume and mixed finite element methods , 1996 .

[4]  Todd Arbogast,et al.  Enhanced Cell-Centered Finite Differences for Elliptic Equations on General Geometry , 1998, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[5]  Jean E. Roberts,et al.  Global estimates for mixed methods for second order elliptic equations , 1985 .

[6]  R. S. Falk,et al.  Error estimates for mixed methods , 1980 .

[7]  L. D. Marini,et al.  Two families of mixed finite elements for second order elliptic problems , 1985 .

[8]  P. Raviart,et al.  A mixed finite element method for 2-nd order elliptic problems , 1977 .

[9]  J. Nédélec Mixed finite elements in ℝ3 , 1980 .

[10]  D. Rose,et al.  Some errors estimates for the box method , 1987 .

[11]  Philippe G. Ciarlet,et al.  The finite element method for elliptic problems , 2002, Classics in applied mathematics.

[12]  B. D. Veubeke Stress function approach , 1975 .

[13]  G. Prathap The Finite Element Method in Structural Mechanics , 1993 .

[14]  M. Fortin,et al.  Mixed finite elements for second order elliptic problems in three variables , 1987 .

[15]  B. R. Baliga,et al.  A NEW FINITE-ELEMENT FORMULATION FOR CONVECTION-DIFFUSION PROBLEMS , 1980 .

[16]  M. Wheeler,et al.  Mixed Finite Elements for Elliptic Problems with Tensor Coefficients as Cell-Centered Finite Differences , 1997 .

[17]  M. Fortin,et al.  E cient rectangular mixed fi-nite elements in two and three space variables , 1987 .

[18]  Michel Fortin,et al.  Mixed and Hybrid Finite Element Methods , 2011, Springer Series in Computational Mathematics.

[19]  B. Heinrich Finite Difference Methods on Irregular Networks , 1987 .

[20]  D. Arnold,et al.  Mixed and nonconforming finite element methods : implementation, postprocessing and error estimates , 1985 .

[21]  T. F. Russell,et al.  Finite element and finite difference methods for continuous flows in porous media. , 1800 .