Error Augmentation Enhancing Arm Recovery in Individuals With Chronic Stroke

Background. Neurorehabilitation studies suggest that manipulation of error signals during practice can stimulate improvement in coordination after stroke. Objective. To test visual display and robotic technology that delivers augmented error signals during training, in participants with stroke. Methods. A total of 26 participants with chronic hemiparesis were trained with haptic (via robot-rendered forces) and graphic (via a virtual environment) distortions to amplify upper-extremity (UE) tracking error. In a randomized crossover design, the intervention was compared with an equivalent amount of practice without error augmentation (EA). Interventions involved three 45-minute sessions per week for 2 weeks, then 1 week of no treatment, and then 2 additional weeks of the alternate treatment. A therapist provided a visual cursor using a tracking device, and participants were instructed to match it with their hand. Haptic and visual EA was used with blinding of participant, therapist, technician-operator, and evaluator. Clinical measures of impairment were obtained at the beginning and end of each 2-week treatment phase as well as at 1 week and at 45 days after the last treatment. Results. Outcomes showed a small, but significant benefit to EA training over simple repetitive practice, with a mean 2-week improvement in Fugl-Meyer UE motor score of 2.08 and Wolf Motor Function Test of timed tasks of 1.48 s. Conclusions. This interactive technology may improve UE motor recovery of stroke-related hemiparesis.

[1]  Mitsuo Kawato,et al.  Feedback-Error-Learning Neural Network for Supervised Motor Learning , 1990 .

[2]  P. Morasso,et al.  Robot therapy for stroke survivors: proprioceptive training and regulation of assistance. , 2009, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[3]  Stacy L Fritz,et al.  Minimal Detectable Change Scores for the Wolf Motor Function Test , 2009, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[4]  J. P. Miller,et al.  Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial. , 2006, JAMA.

[5]  R M Enoka,et al.  Neural adaptations with chronic physical activity. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  D. Sackett.  Turning a blind eye:Why we don't test for blindness at the end of our trials , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[7]  Terry E. Duncan,et al.  Psychometric properties of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory in a competitive sport setting: a confirmatory factor analysis. , 1989, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[8]  E. Taub,et al.  Constraint-induced movement therapy and massed practice. , 2000, Stroke.

[9]  D.J. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Robot-enhanced motor learning: accelerating internal model formation during locomotion by transient dynamic amplification , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[10]  S. Wolf,et al.  Assessing Wolf Motor Function Test as Outcome Measure for Research in Patients After Stroke , 2001, Stroke.

[11]  Robert J. Crutcher,et al.  The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. , 1993 .

[12]  J. Patton,et al.  Evaluation of robotic training forces that either enhance or reduce error in chronic hemiparetic stroke survivors , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[13]  D.J. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Automating Arm Movement Training Following Severe Stroke: Functional Exercises With Quantitative Feedback in a Gravity-Reduced Environment , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[14]  Y. Matsuoka,et al.  Perceptual limits for a robotic rehabilitation environment using visual feedback distortion , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[15]  N. Hogan,et al.  Robotics and other devices in the treatment of patients recovering from stroke , 2004, Current neurology and neuroscience reports.

[16]  K. Stanley.  Evaluation of Randomized Controlled Trials , 2007, Circulation.

[17]  P A Thompson,et al.  The Motor Activity Log-28 , 2006, Neurology.

[18]  Clint Zollinger.  Effects of Constraint-induced Movement Therapy on Patients With Chronic Motor Deficits After Stroke - A Replication. , 2000 .

[19]  C. Burgar,et al.  Robot-assisted movement training compared with conventional therapy techniques for the rehabilitation of upper-limb motor function after stroke. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[20]  Hui Chen,et al.  Test-Retest Reproducibility and Smallest Real Difference of 5 Hand Function Tests in Patients With Stroke , 2009, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[21]  Chris Scharver,et al.  Robotics and Virtual Reality: A Perfect Marriage for Motor Control Research and Rehabilitation , 2006, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[22]  B. Volpe,et al.  Motor Impairment as a Predictor of Functional Recovery and Guide to Rehabilitation Treatment After Stroke , 2001, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[23]  Neville Hogan,et al.  Intensive Sensorimotor Arm Training Mediated by Therapist or Robot Improves Hemiparesis in Patients With Chronic Stroke , 2008, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[24]  M. Perenin,et al.  Prism adaptation to a rightward optical deviation rehabilitates left hemispatial neglect , 1998, Nature.

[25]  T. Rahman,et al.  A body-powered functional upper limb orthosis. , 2000, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[26]  Ferdinando A. Mussa-Ivaldi,et al.  Robot-assisted adaptive training: custom force fields for teaching movement patterns , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[27]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Constrained and unconstrained movements involve different control strategies. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[28]  P. Gribble,et al.  Are there distinct neural representations of object and limb dynamics? , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[29]  P. Lavori,et al.  Analysis of randomized controlled trials. , 2002, Epidemiologic reviews.

[30]  J. Buurke,et al.  Effect of position feedback during task-oriented upper-limb training after stroke: five-case pilot study. , 2011, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[31]  J. Patton,et al.  Custom-designed haptic training for restoring reaching ability to individuals with poststroke hemiparesis. , 2006, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[32]  Paul A Thompson,et al.  Retention of upper limb function in stroke survivors who have received constraint-induced movement therapy: the EXCITE randomised trial , 2008, The Lancet Neurology.

[33]  N. Hogan,et al.  Comparison of Two Techniques of Robot-Aided Upper Limb Exercise Training After Stroke , 2004, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[34]  T. Platz,et al.  Reliability and validity of arm function assessment with standardized guidelines for the Fugl-Meyer Test, Action Research Arm Test and Box and Block Test: a multicentre study , 2005, Clinical rehabilitation.

[35]  W. J. Powers,et al.  Very Early Constraint-Induced Movement during Stroke Rehabilitation (VECTORS) , 2009, Neurology.

[36]  R. Shepherd,et al.  Task-related training improves performance of seated reaching tasks after stroke. A randomized controlled trial. , 1997, Stroke.