Discrepancies in accelerometer-measured physical activity in children due to cut-point non-equivalence and placement site

Abstract This study examined dissonance in physical activity (PA) between two youth-specific hip-derived intensity cut-points for the Actiwatch (AW), and compared PA between hip and wrist placements using site-specific cut-points. Twenty-four children aged 11.2 ± 0.5 years wore the AW on the right hip and non-dominant wrist during a typical school day. Minutes of sedentary behaviour and vigorous activity were greater using Puyau et al. (2002) cut-points, but light, moderate, and moderate-to-vigorous (MVPA) were greater when derived using Puyau et al. (2004) cut-points (P < 0.01). Total hip activity counts were lower than wrist. Sedentary minutes were greater at the hip, but minutes of light, vigorous and MVPA were lower (P < 0.01). Moderate minutes were greater at the hip, but differed only when applying the Puyau et al. (2004) cut-points (P < 0.01). In conclusion, data comparisons between two hip derived AW cut-points and between hip and wrist data are inappropriate. Future researchers using the AW at the hip should present data reduced using both published cut-points. As hip and wrist data differ, the wrist placement is preferable as it will likely increase children's compliance to monitoring protocols due to reduced obtrusiveness compared to the hip.

[1]  S. Blair,et al.  Calibration of an accelerometer during free-living activities in children. , 2007, International journal of pediatric obesity : IJPO : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity.

[2]  S. Berthoin,et al.  Improving physical activity assessment in prepubertal children with high-frequency accelerometry monitoring: a methodological issue. , 2007, Preventive medicine.

[3]  Gregory J Welk,et al.  Principles of design and analyses for the calibration of accelerometry-based activity monitors. , 2005, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[4]  D. Upton,et al.  Intra- and Inter-Instrument Reliability of the Actiwatch 4 Accelerometer in a Mechanical Laboratory Setting , 2012, Journal of human kinetics.

[5]  J M Bland,et al.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement , 1986 .

[6]  Tom Baranowski,et al.  Decision boundaries and receiver operating characteristic curves: New methods for determining accelerometer cutpoints , 2007, Journal of sports sciences.

[7]  Sung Gyoo Park Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise , 1981 .

[8]  Ulf Ekelund,et al.  The ABC of Physical Activity for Health: A consensus statement from the British Association of Sport and Exercise Sciences , 2010, Journal of sports sciences.

[9]  D. Bassett,et al.  The technology of accelerometry-based activity monitors: current and future. , 2005, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[10]  Actigraph‐defined moderate‐to‐vigorous physical activity cut‐off points among children: statistical and biobehavioural relevance , 2009, Acta paediatrica.

[11]  M. Tremblay,et al.  Comparative validity assessment of five activity monitors: does being a child matter? , 2007, Pediatric exercise science.

[12]  U. Ekelund,et al.  Assessing Physical Activity Among Children With Accelerometers Using Different Time Sampling Intervals and Placements , 2002 .

[13]  KR Westerterp,et al.  Physical activity assessment with accelerometers , 1999, International Journal of Obesity.

[14]  Teresa L. Abraham,et al.  Epoch length and accelerometer outputs in children: comparison to direct observation. , 2008, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[15]  S. Blair,et al.  Objectively Measured Physical Activity and Fat Mass in a Large Cohort of Children , 2007, PLoS medicine.

[16]  M. Puyau,et al.  Validation and calibration of physical activity monitors in children. , 2002, Obesity research.

[17]  Ulf Ekelund,et al.  Effect of monitor placement and of activity setting on the MTI accelerometer output. , 2003, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[18]  K J Finn,et al.  Comparison of Actiwatch activity monitor and Children's Activity Rating Scale in children. , 2000, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[19]  Patty Freedson,et al.  Calibration of accelerometer output for children. , 2005, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[20]  Michael Catt,et al.  Validation of the GENEA Accelerometer. , 2011, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[21]  Christian Vilhelm,et al.  Moderate‐to‐Vigorous Physical Activity among Children: Discrepancies in Accelerometry‐Based Cut‐off Points , 2006, Obesity.

[23]  Ulf Ekelund,et al.  Is the ArteACC index a valid indicator of free-living physical activity in adolescents? , 2003, Obesity research.

[24]  T. Gorely,et al.  Epoch length and its effect on physical activity intensity. , 2010, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[25]  S. Trost,et al.  Calibration and Evaluation of an Objective Measure of Physical Activity in Preschool Children , 2005 .

[26]  U. Ekelund,et al.  Validity and Comparability of a Wrist-Worn Accelerometer in Children. , 2012, Journal of physical activity & health.

[27]  S. Trost,et al.  Calibration and evaluation of an objective measure of physical activity in pre-school children , 2005 .

[28]  Marsha Dowda,et al.  Equating accelerometer estimates of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity: in search of the Rosetta Stone. , 2011, Journal of science and medicine in sport.

[29]  Issa Zakeri,et al.  Prediction of activity energy expenditure using accelerometers in children. , 2004, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[30]  Lucas J Carr,et al.  Letter to the editor: standardized use of the terms "sedentary" and "sedentary behaviours". , 2012, Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism = Physiologie appliquee, nutrition et metabolisme.

[31]  A. Nevill,et al.  Assessing agreement between measurements recorded on a ratio scale in sports medicine and sports science. , 1997, British journal of sports medicine.

[32]  Dylan P Cliff,et al.  Comparison of two sets of accelerometer cut-off points for calculating moderate-to-vigorous physical activity in young children. , 2007, Journal of physical activity & health.

[33]  Y Schutz,et al.  Daily physical activity assessment: what is the importance of upper limb movements vs whole body movements? , 2004, International Journal of Obesity.

[34]  Stewart G. Trost,et al.  State of the Art Reviews: Measurement of Physical Activity in Children and Adolescents , 2007 .

[35]  Edward M. Winter,et al.  JUMPING: POWER OR IMPULSE? , 2005 .

[36]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[37]  Stewart G Trost,et al.  Comparison of accelerometer cut points for predicting activity intensity in youth. , 2011, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.