Target identification and validation in drug discovery: the role of proteomics.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Terrence P. Kenakin,et al. A Pharmacologic Analysis of Drug-Receptor Interaction , 1987 .
[2] M. Wilkins,et al. Progress with gene‐product mapping of the Mollicutes: Mycoplasma genitalium , 1995, Electrophoresis.
[3] G. Heijne,et al. Genome‐wide analysis of integral membrane proteins from eubacterial, archaean, and eukaryotic organisms , 1998, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.
[4] N. Cairns,et al. Increased levels of 14-3-3 gamma and epsilon proteins in brain of patients with Alzheimer's disease and Down syndrome. , 1999, Journal of neural transmission. Supplementum.
[5] S. Grant,et al. Proteomic analysis of NMDA receptor–adhesion protein signaling complexes , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.
[6] J. Garin,et al. Organic solvent extraction as a versatile procedure to identify hydrophobic chloroplast membrane proteins , 2000, Electrophoresis.
[7] S. Weinberger,et al. Recent advancements in surface‐enhanced laser desorption/ionization‐time of flight‐mass spectrometry , 2000, Electrophoresis.
[8] A. Krogh,et al. Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.
[9] David F. Horrobin,et al. Realism in drug discovery—could Cassandra be right? , 2001, Nature Biotechnology.
[10] R. Schwartz,et al. Whole proteome pI values correlate with subcellular localizations of proteins for organisms within the three domains of life. , 2001, Genome research.
[11] J M Gauthier,et al. Protein--protein interaction maps: a lead towards cellular functions. , 2001, Trends in genetics : TIG.
[12] M. Dierssen,et al. Proteomic analysis of the fetal brain , 2002, Proteomics.
[13] E. Petricoin,et al. Clinical proteomics: translating benchside promise into bedside reality , 2002, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.
[14] A. Hopkins,et al. The druggable genome , 2002, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.
[15] Robert S Hauptschein,et al. Global high-throughput screens for cellular function. , 2002, Experimental hematology.
[16] Kai Stühler,et al. Genetic analysis of the mouse brain proteome , 2002, Nature Genetics.
[17] D. Pisetsky,et al. DNA microarrays: boundless technology or bound by technology? Guidelines for studies using microarray technology. , 2002, Arthritis and rheumatism.
[18] R. Henningsen,et al. Application of zwitterionic detergents to the solubilization of integral membrane proteins for two‐dimensional gel electrophoresis and mass spectrometry , 2002, Proteomics.
[19] J. Drews. Stategic trends in the drug industry. , 2003, Drug discovery today.
[20] Richard D. Smith,et al. Affinity labeling of highly hydrophobic integral membrane proteins for proteome-wide analysis. , 2003, Journal of proteome research.
[21] Philippe Marin,et al. The ‘magic tail’ of G protein‐coupled receptors: an anchorage for functional protein networks , 2003, FEBS letters.
[22] F. Collins,et al. A vision for the future of genomics research , 2003, Nature.
[23] S. Patterson. Data analysis—the Achilles heel of proteomics , 2003, Nature Biotechnology.
[24] Laszlo Prokai,et al. Proteomic analysis of the synaptic plasma membrane fraction isolated from rat forebrain. , 2003, Brain research. Molecular brain research.
[25] Clinical Applications of Proteomics , 2003 .
[26] Matthew Bogyo,et al. Chemical proteomics and its application to drug discovery. , 2003, Current opinion in biotechnology.
[27] David F. Horrobin,et al. Modern biomedical research: an internally self-consistent universe with little contact with medical reality? , 2003, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.
[28] G. Lubec,et al. Evidence for existence of thirty hypothetical proteins in rat brain , 2004, Proteome Science.
[29] G. Duyk. Attrition and Translation , 2003, Science.
[30] A. Sands,et al. Knockouts model the 100 best-selling drugs—will they model the next 100? , 2003, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.
[31] M. Cotten,et al. An efficient proteomics method to identify the cellular targets of protein kinase inhibitors , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[32] L. Huber. Is proteomics heading in the wrong direction? , 2003, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.
[33] J. Yates,et al. The application of mass spectrometry to membrane proteomics , 2003, Nature Biotechnology.
[34] Yoshiya Oda,et al. Quantitative chemical proteomics for identifying candidate drug targets. , 2003, Analytical chemistry.
[35] George M. Milne,et al. Chapter 35. Pharmaceutical productivity — the imperative for new paradigms , 2003 .
[36] Richard D. Smith,et al. Proteome analysis by mass spectrometry. , 2003, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.
[37] E. Kunkel. Systems biology in drug discovery , 2004, Nature Biotechnology.
[38] Michael Williams. A return to the fundamentals of drug discovery? , 2004, Current opinion in investigational drugs.
[39] Dalia Cohen,et al. Functional genomics to new drug targets , 2004, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.
[40] Michael Cascio,et al. Neuroproteomics: Expression Profiling of the Brain's Proteomes in Health and Disease , 2004, Neurochemical Research.
[41] D. Bridges,et al. 14-3-3 Proteins: A Number of Functions for a Numbered Protein , 2004, Science's STKE.
[42] C. Southan. Has the yo‐yo stopped? An assessment of human protein‐coding gene number , 2004, Proteomics.
[43] Emanuel F Petricoin,et al. Lessons from Kitty Hawk: From feasibility to routine clinical use for the field of proteomic pattern diagnostics , 2004, Proteomics.
[44] Lani F. Wu,et al. Multidimensional Drug Profiling By Automated Microscopy , 2004, Science.
[45] R. Horton. AIDS: The Elusive Vaccine , 2004 .
[46] S. Grant,et al. Proteomics in postgenomic neuroscience: the end of the beginning , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.
[47] Michael E Phelps,et al. Systems Biology and New Technologies Enable Predictive and Preventative Medicine , 2004, Science.
[48] S. Haggarty,et al. Finding new components of the target of rapamycin (TOR) signaling network through chemical genetics and proteome chips. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.