Impact of population management with direct physician feedback on care of patients with type 2 diabetes.

OBJECTIVE Population-level strategies may improve primary care for diabetes. We designed a controlled study to assess the impact of population management versus usual care on metabolic risk factor testing and management in patients with type 2 diabetes. We also identified potential patient-related barriers to effective diabetes management. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We used novel clinical software to rank 910 patients in a diabetes registry at a single primary care clinic and thereby identify the 149 patients with the highest HbA(1c) and cholesterol levels. After review of the medical records of these 149 patients, evidence-based guideline recommendations regarding metabolic testing and management were sent via e-mail to each intervention patient's primary care provider (PCP). Over a 3-month follow-up period, we assessed changes in the evidence-based management of intervention patients compared with a matched cohort of control patients receiving usual care at a second primary care clinic affiliated with the same academic medical center. RESULTS In the intervention cohort, PCPs followed testing recommendations more often (78%) than therapeutic change recommendations (36%, P = 0.001). Compared with the usual care control cohort, population management resulted in a greater overall proportion of evidence-based guideline practices being followed (59 vs. 45%, P = 0.02). Most intervention patients (62%) had potential barriers to effective care, including depression (35%), substance abuse (26%), and prior nonadherence to care plans (18%). CONCLUSIONS Population management with clinical recommendations sent to PCPs had a modest but statistically significant impact on the evidence-based management of diabetes compared with usual care. Depression and substance abuse are prevalent patient-level adherence barriers in patients with poor metabolic control.

[1]  M. Pahor,et al.  Glycemic Control of Older Adults with Type 2 Diabetes: Findings from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988–1994 , 2000, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[2]  R. Haynes,et al.  Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on physician performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. , 1998, JAMA.

[3]  D. Petitti,et al.  Evaluation of the effect of performance monitoring and feedback on care process, utilization, and outcome. , 2000, Diabetes care.

[4]  M. A. Nyman,et al.  Improving performance in diabetes care: a multicomponent intervention. , 2000, Effective clinical practice : ECP.

[5]  Population-based health principles in medical and public health practice. , 2001, Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP.

[6]  M. Engelgau,et al.  A Diabetes Report Card for the United States: Quality of Care in the 1990s , 2002, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[7]  William Branch,et al.  Clinical Inertia , 2001, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[8]  David Blumenthal,et al.  Improving Preventive Care by Prompting Physicians , 2001 .

[9]  C. McDonald,et al.  The Promise of Computerized Feedback Systems for Diabetes Care , 1996, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[10]  G. R. Reed,et al.  Diabetes Self-Management: Self-reported recommendations and patterns in a large population , 1997, Diabetes Care.

[11]  J. Meigs,et al.  The Use of Computers in Population-Based Diabetes Management , 2002 .

[12]  D L Hunt,et al.  Patient-specific evidence-based care recommendations for diabetes mellitus: development and initial clinic experience with a computerized decision support system , 1998, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[13]  Edward J Boyko,et al.  Diet and exercise among adults with type 2 diabetes: findings from the third national health and nutrition examination survey (NHANES III). , 2002, Diabetes care.

[14]  D. Classen,et al.  Clinical decision support systems to improve clinical practice and quality of care. , 1998, JAMA.

[15]  Richard W Grant,et al.  Comparison of hyperglycemia, hypertension, and hypercholesterolemia management in patients with type 2 diabetes. , 2002, The American journal of medicine.

[16]  David M Nathan,et al.  A controlled trial of web-based diabetes disease management: the MGH diabetes primary care improvement project. , 2003, Diabetes care.

[17]  K Y Liang,et al.  Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes. , 1986, Biometrics.

[18]  R. Glasgow,et al.  Personal-Model Beliefs and Social-Environmental Barriers Related to Diabetes Self-Management , 1997, Diabetes Care.

[19]  D. Matthews.  The natural history of diabetes‐related complications: the UKPDS experience , 1999, Diabetes, obesity & metabolism.

[20]  D. Andrulis,et al.  Access to Care Is the Centerpiece in the Elimination of Socioeconomic Disparities in Health , 1998, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[21]  W. Assendelft,et al.  Interventions to improve the management of diabetes in primary care, outpatient, and community settings: a systematic review. , 2001, Diabetes care.