Turning a Community into a Market: A Practice Perspective on IT Use in Boundary-Spanning

This paper examines how Information Technology (IT) transforms relations across fields of practice within organizations. Drawing on Bourdieu’s practice theory, we argue that the production of any practice involves varying degrees of embodiment (i.e., relying on personal relationships) and objectification (i.e., relying on the exchange of objects). We subsequently characterize boundary-spanning practices according to their relative degrees of embodiment and objectification. We distinguish between "market-like" boundary-spanning practices which rely primarily on an objectified mode of practice production from “community-like” practices which involve mostly the embodied mode of practice production. IT is then conceptualized as a medium for sharing objects in the production of practices. As such, IT use allows, but does not necessitate, the sharing of objects without relying on embodied relationships. We use data from an in-depth ethnographic case study to investigate how IT was used in such a way as to transform community-like boundary-spanning practices within an organization into market-like ones. Moreover, we demonstrate how, as IT became used to support the exchange and combination of de-personalized objects, other aspects of the practice (such as the roles of intermediaries and the nature of meetings) also changed. The related changes in these diverse aspects of a boundary-spanning practice supported the trend towards greater objectification. IT use also made the terms of exchange vis-a-vis the objects in a market-like practice more visible to relevant stakeholders. This increased visibility exposed the inequity of the exchange and encouraged the disadvantaged party to renegotiate the relationship.

[1]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  Different knowledge, different benefits: toward a productivity perspective on knowledge sharing in organizations , 2007 .

[2]  Emmanuelle Vaast,et al.  Special Issue: Organizational Design: Multiple Faces of Codification: Organizational Redesign in an IT Organization , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[3]  Emmanuelle Vaast,et al.  The Emergence of Boundary Spanning Competence in Practice: Implications for Implementation and Use of Information Systems , 2005, MIS Q..

[4]  Carsten S. Østerlund,et al.  Relations in Practice: Sorting Through Practice Theories on Knowledge Sharing in Complex Organizations , 2005, Inf. Soc..

[5]  Sridhar Narasimhan,et al.  Effects of Relational Factors and Channel Climate on EDI Usage in the Customer-Supplier Relationship , 2005, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[6]  Marie-Claude Boudreau,et al.  Enacting Integrated Information Technology: A Human Agency Perspective , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[7]  Suzanne D. Pawlowski,et al.  Bridging User Organizations: Knowledge Brokering and the Work of Information Technology Professionals , 2004, MIS Q..

[8]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  Enterprise systems, knowledge transfer and power users , 2004, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[9]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  Transferring, Translating, and Transforming: An Integrative Framework for Managing Knowledge Across Boundaries , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[10]  Andrew Parker,et al.  The Hidden Power of Social Networks: Understanding How Work Really Gets Done in Organizations , 2004 .

[11]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  A Practice Perspective on Technology-Mediated Network Relations: The Use of Internet-Based Self-Serve Technologies , 2004, Inf. Syst. Res..

[12]  Leigh Weiss,et al.  Coordination Networks within and Across Organizations: A Multi-Level Framework , 2004 .

[13]  D. J. Wu,et al.  Codifiability, Relationship-Specific Information Technology Investment, and Optimal Contracting , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[14]  Beth A. Bechky Sharing Meaning Across Occupational Communities: The Transformation of Understanding on a Production Floor , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[15]  Elizabeth J. Davidson,et al.  Technology Frames and Framing: A Socio-Cognitive Investigation of Requirements Determination , 2002, MIS Q..

[16]  A. Parry Handbook of Qualitative Research , 2002 .

[17]  Jeanne W. Ross,et al.  Learning to Implement Enterprise Systems: An Exploratory Study of the Dialectics of Change , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[18]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[19]  Bonnie A. Nardi and Steve Whittaker The Place of Face-to-Face Communication in Distributed Work , 2002 .

[20]  William Snyder,et al.  Cultivating Communities of Practice: A Guide to Managing Knowledge , 2002 .

[21]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  The Place of Face-to-Face Communication in Distributed Work , 2002 .

[22]  Deborah Dougherty,et al.  Reimagining the Differentiation and Integration of Work for Sustained Product Innovation , 2001 .

[23]  S. Newell,et al.  From global knowledge management to internal electronic fences: contradictory outcomes of intranet development , 2001 .

[24]  S. Barley,et al.  Bringing Work Back In , 2001 .

[25]  Lee Sproull,et al.  Essence of Distributed Work: The Case of the Linux Kernel , 2000, First Monday.

[26]  Richard J. Boland,et al.  Knowledge management technology and the reproduction of knowledge work practices , 2000, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[27]  John M. Silvester,et al.  The Social Life of Information: Brown, J.S., & Duguid, P. (2000). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing. ISBN 0-87584-762-5. 320 pages , 2000, Internet High. Educ..

[28]  John Seely Brown,et al.  Book Reviews : The Social Life of Information By John Seely Brown and Paul Duguid. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2000. 320 pages , 2000 .

[29]  Henk W. Volberda,et al.  Where Do New Organizational Forms Come From? Management Logics as a Source of Coevolution , 1999 .

[30]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems , 1999, MIS Q..

[31]  Marie-Claude Boudreau,et al.  Accounting for the Contradictory Organizational Consequences of Information Technology: Theoretical Directions and Methodological Implications , 1999, Inf. Syst. Res..

[32]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Coordination and Virtualization: The Role of Electronic Networks and Personal Relationships , 1999, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[33]  Jay R. Galbraith,et al.  Tomorrow's Organization: Crafting Winning Capabilities in a Dynamic World , 1998 .

[34]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Enabling the Effective Involvement of Multiple Users: Methods and Tools for Collaborative Software Engineering , 1997, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[35]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[36]  M. Bensaou,et al.  Interorganizational Cooperation: The Role of Information Technology an Empirical Comparison of U.S. and Japanese Supplier Relations , 1997, Inf. Syst. Res..

[37]  A. Strauss,et al.  Grounded Theory in Practice , 1997 .

[38]  S. Kiesler,et al.  The kindness of strangers: on the usefulness of electronic weak ties for technical advice , 1996 .

[39]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Improvising Organizational Transformation Over Time: A Situated Change Perspective , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[40]  J. Walther,et al.  Computer-mediated communication , 2011 .

[41]  Geoffrey C. Bowker,et al.  Infrastructure and Organizational Transformation: Classifying Nurses’ Work , 1996 .

[42]  Blake Ives,et al.  The Global Network Organization of the Future: Information Management Opportunities and Challenges , 1994, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[43]  P. Prasad,et al.  Symbolic processes in the implementation of technological change: a symbolic interactionist study of work computerization. , 1993, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[44]  Jay R. Galbraith Competing with flexible lateral organizations , 1993 .

[45]  Eric K. Clemons,et al.  Limits to Interfirm Coordination through Information Technology: Results of a Field Study in Consumer Packaged Goods Distribution , 1993, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[46]  P. Bourdieu,et al.  实践与反思 : 反思社会学导引 = An invitation to reflexive sociology , 1994 .

[47]  Kathryn Henderson,et al.  Flexible Sketches and Inflexible Data Bases: Visual Communication, Conscription Devices, and Boundary Objects in Design Engineering , 1991 .

[48]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[49]  J. Cassell Tales of the Field: On Writing Ethnography , 1990 .

[50]  A. Pettigrew Longitudinal Field Research on Change: Theory and Practice , 1990 .

[51]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 , 1989 .

[52]  Susan T. Dumais,et al.  Computerization, productivity, and quality of work-life , 1989, CACM.

[53]  J. V. Maanen,et al.  Tales of the Field: On Writing Ethnography , 1989 .

[54]  JoAnne Yates,et al.  Electronic markets and electronic hierarchies , 1987, CACM.

[55]  Linda S. Lotto Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods , 1986 .

[56]  S. Barley Technology as an occasion for structuring: evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. , 1986, Administrative science quarterly.

[57]  M. Agar The professional stranger : an informal introduction to ethnography , 1981 .

[58]  M. Tushman Special Boundary Roles in the Innovation Process. , 1977 .

[59]  Stephen I. Cohen,et al.  Information Flow in Research and Development Laboratories. , 1969 .

[60]  P. Lawrence,et al.  Differentiation and Integration in Complex Organizations , 1967 .

[61]  D. Forde Studies in Anthropology , 1953, Nature.