Treatment algorithms and protocolized care

Purpose of reviewExcess information in complex ICU environments exceeds human decision-making limits and likely contributes to unnecessary variation in clinical care, increasing the likelihood of clinical errors. I reviewed recent critical care clinical trials searching for information about the impact of protocol use on clinically pertinent outcomes. Recent findingsSeveral recently published clinical trials illustrate the importance of distinguishing efficacy and effectiveness trials. One of these trials illustrates the danger of conducting effectiveness trials before the efficacy of an intervention is established. The trials also illustrate the importance of distinguishing guidelines and inadequately explicit protocols from adequately explicit protocols. Only adequately explicit protocols contain enough detail to lead different clinicians to the same decision when faced with the same clinical scenario. SummaryDifferences between guidelines and protocols are important. Guidelines lack detail and provide general guidance that requires clinicians to fill in many gaps. Computerized or paper-based protocols are detailed and, when used for complex clinical ICU problems, can generate patient-specific, evidence-based therapy instructions that can be carried out by different clinicians with almost no interclinician variability. Individualization of patient therapy can be preserved by these protocols when they are driven by individual patient data. Explicit decision-support tools (eg, guidelines and protocols) have favorable effects on clinician and patient outcomes and can reduce the variation in clinical practice. Guidelines and protocols that aid ICU decision makers should be more widely distributed.

[1]  Alan Morris Developing and Implementing Computerized Protocols for Standardization of Clinical Decisions , 2000, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[2]  A. Wheeler,et al.  New ways to reduce unnecessary variation and improve outcomes in the intensive care unit , 2001, Current opinion in critical care.

[3]  Redman Bk Clinical practice guidelines as tools of public policy: conflicts of purpose, issues of autonomy, and justice. , 1994 .

[4]  E. Ivers,et al.  Early Goal-Directed Therapy in the Treatment of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock , 2001 .

[5]  Alan H. Morris,et al.  Efficacy of computerized decision support for mechanical ventilation: results of a prospective multi-center randomized trial , 1999, AMIA.

[6]  D. Cook,et al.  The design of randomized clinical trials in critically ill patients. , 2002, Chest.

[7]  B. Bistrian,et al.  Intensive insulin therapy in critically ill patients. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  S. Tatter,et al.  Predictors of successful extubation in neurosurgical patients. , 2001, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[9]  G. Godet,et al.  The Impact of a Cardioprotective Protocol on the Incidence of Cardiac Complications After Aortic Abdominal Surgery , 2003, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[10]  B. Redman Clinical Practice Guidelines as Tools of Public Policy: Conflicts of Purpose, Issues of Autonomy, and Justice , 1994, The Journal of Clinical Ethics.

[11]  R. Haynes,et al.  Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on physician performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. , 1998, JAMA.

[12]  R. Brant,et al.  A randomized, controlled trial of the use of pulmonary-artery catheters in high-risk surgical patients. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  E. Nelson,et al.  Building Measurement and Data Collection into Medical Practice , 1998, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[14]  N. Ambrosino,et al.  Comparison of two methods for weaning patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease requiring mechanical ventilation for more than 15 days. , 2001, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[15]  Karen J. Chan,et al.  Hyperbaric oxygen for acute carbon monoxide poisoning. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  T D East,et al.  Computerized decision support for mechanical ventilation of trauma induced ARDS: results of a randomized clinical trial. , 2001, The Journal of trauma.

[17]  D Hess,et al.  Evidence-based guidelines for weaning and discontinuing ventilatory support: a collective task force facilitated by the American College of Chest Physicians; the American Association for Respiratory Care; and the American College of Critical Care Medicine. , 2001, Chest.

[18]  M Schetz,et al.  Intensive insulin therapy in critically ill patients. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  N Mutz,et al.  Long-term effects of spontaneous breathing during ventilatory support in patients with acute lung injury. , 2001, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[20]  D. Spain,et al.  Enteral tube feeding in the intensive care unit: factors impeding adequate delivery. , 1999, Critical care medicine.

[21]  J. Vender,et al.  Balancing Sedation and Analgesia in the Critically I11 , 2001 .

[22]  D. Schoenfeld,et al.  Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  P. Landais,et al.  Distribution of the Probability of Survival Is a Strategic Issue for Randomized Trials in Critically Ill Patients , 2001, Anesthesiology.

[24]  W. Hammond,et al.  Computerized decision support based on a clinical practice guideline improves compliance with care standards. , 1997, The American journal of medicine.

[25]  D M Rind,et al.  Effects of a knowledge-based electronic patient record in adherence to practice guidelines. , 1996, M.D. computing : computers in medical practice.

[26]  J. Vender,et al.  Commentary. Balancing sedation and analgesia in the critically ill. , 2001, Critical care clinics.

[27]  Fredric M. Wolf,et al.  Are Clinicians Correct When They Believe They are Correct? Implications for Medical Decision Support , 2001, MedInfo.