International Trade, Transportation Networks and Port Choice

Rapid increases in international trade have led to congestion in many of the worlds' ports and have raised concern over the ability of transportation networks to handle the increased volumes. Increased volumes and the resulting congestion may impact trade flow patterns by affecting choices of importers and exporters. Trade flow patterns are most certainly determined by a wide variety of factors that include the internal (intra-country) and external (inter-country) transport costs, as well as the costs of interchange (port costs). Yet, there is little evidence that documents each of these factors in the determination of trade flow patterns. As any of these factors become relatively more or less congested, there may be significant impacts not only on the network paths chosen, but also on the volume of activity. This paper develops a model of port choice and trading volumes and then estimates the impact of ocean transport rates, efficiency of U.S. ocean ports, and internal transport systems on port choice and trade volume over a sample trade flows between over 150 foreign countries and the top U.S. ports for the period from 1991 through 2003. Our estimates provide strong evidence for the importance of economic factors in port choices. Distance and transport prices are very significant factors with quite elastic responses by shipments well above one in absolute magnitude. Unlike previous studies, this paper's analysis finds a significant role for an individual's port efficiency in determining its share of activity, with estimates ranging from 0.8 to 2.0 depending on the empirical specification used.

[1]  Adib Kanafani,et al.  A disaggregate analysis of port selection , 2004 .

[2]  Adib Kanafani,et al.  A disaggregate analysis of factors influencing port selection , 2001 .

[3]  Dong-Wook Song,et al.  A Competitive Analysis of Chinese Container Ports Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2004 .

[4]  Piyush Tiwari,et al.  Shippers' Port and Carrier Selection Behaviour in China: A Discrete Choice Analysis , 2003 .

[5]  M R Brooks,et al.  AN ALTERNATIVE THEORETICAL APPROACH TO THE EVALUATION OF LINER SHIPPING : PART II, CHOICE CRITERIA MARY R. BROOKS , 1985 .

[6]  J. Daley,et al.  A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PORT SELECTION FACTORS , 1994 .

[7]  C. D. Harris The, Market as a Factor in the Localization of Industry in the United States , 1954 .

[8]  T. Mayer,et al.  Market Potential and the Location of Japanese Investment in the European Union , 2002, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[9]  S J Meyrick,et al.  CARRIER SELECTION IN A RO/RO FERRY TRADE. , 1992 .

[10]  Anthony Kenneth Charles Beresford,et al.  Transhipment Port Selection and Decision-making Behaviour: Analysing the Taiwanese Case , 2003 .

[11]  David Hummels,et al.  Toward a Geography of Trade Costs , 1999, GTAP Working Paper.

[12]  Bruce A. Blonigen,et al.  The Navigation Economic Technologies Program February 1 , 2006 NEW MEASURES OF PORT EFFICIENCY USING INTERNATIONAL TRADE DATA , 2006 .

[13]  K. Head,et al.  Increasing Returns versus National Product Differentiation as an Explanation for the Pattern of US-C , 2001 .

[14]  B. Slack CONTAINERIZATION, INTER-PORT COMPETITION, AND PORT SELECTION , 1985 .

[15]  J. Hudson A DIAMOND ANNIVERSARY , 1979 .

[16]  Alejandro Micco,et al.  Port Efficiency, Maritime Transport Costs and Bilateral Trade , 2004 .

[17]  James E. Anderson A Theoretical Foundation for the Gravity Equation , 1979 .