How can business buyers attract sellers' resources? Empirical evidence for preferred customer treatment from suppliers

Abstract This paper describes a study that investigates what makes a buyer attractive to a seller in a business-to-business buyer–seller relationship and encourages the seller to commit to and invest resources preferentially in the relationship. The study helps answer the question, “What is it that the buyer needs to do to create this attractiveness?” The perspective is somewhat unusual in the marketing literature for two reasons. Firstly, because it investigates how the supplier perspective of customer financial attractiveness affects the attitudes and actions of the supplier towards the buyer, rather than taking the buyer's perspective across the relationship. Secondly, the study has relationship attractiveness in terms of financial performance as an antecedent of its relationship constructs, whereas most relationship studies investigate performance as an outcome. The paper develops a model that proposes the seller's perception of customer financial attractiveness, seller satisfaction, and seller commitment as drivers of the seller's preferred customer treatment by allocation of resources to the relationship. The bases for the study's model are the resource-based view of the firm, the industrial marketing and purchasing (IMP) models, and related resource-focused theoretical streams. The study finds support for the model in the analysis of survey data.

[1]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Knowledge Creating Company , 2008 .

[2]  Andreas Eggert,et al.  Relationship value and relationship quality: Broadening the nomological network of business‐to‐business relationships , 2006 .

[3]  B. Donaldson,et al.  Relationship performance dimensions of buyer–supplier exchanges , 2002 .

[4]  A. Wong,et al.  Integrating supplier satisfaction with customer satisfaction , 2000 .

[5]  Alhassan G. Abdul-Muhmin Instrumental and interpersonal determinants of relationship satisfaction and commitment in industrial markets , 2005 .

[6]  Robert W. Palmatier,et al.  Influence of customer participation on creating and sharing of new product value , 2008 .

[7]  Stephan M. Wagner,et al.  HANDLING NONRESPONSE IN LOGISTICS RESEARCH , 2010 .

[8]  Shelby D. Hunt,et al.  Relationship-Based Competitive Advantage: The Role of Relationship Marketing in Marketing Strategy , 1999 .

[9]  Robert W. Palmatier Interfirm Relational Drivers of Customer Value , 2008 .

[10]  A. Joshi,et al.  Continuous Supplier Performance Improvement: Effects of Collaborative Communication and Control , 2009 .

[11]  J. Hair Multivariate data analysis , 1972 .

[12]  Thomas Ritter,et al.  More is not always better: The impact of relationship functions on customer-perceived relationship value , 2012 .

[13]  J. Semeijn,et al.  Supplier satisfaction and commitment: The role of influence strategies and supplier development , 2010 .

[14]  R. Handfield,et al.  Supplier integration into new product development: coordinating product, process and supply chain design , 2005 .

[15]  A. Walter,et al.  Relationship-specific factors influencing supplier involvement in customer new product development , 2003 .

[16]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[17]  Daniel R. Krause The antecedents of buying firms' efforts to improve suppliers , 1999 .

[18]  Holger Schiele,et al.  Consortium benchmarking: Collaborative academic–practitioner case study research , 2011 .

[19]  David F. Larcker,et al.  Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics: , 1981 .

[20]  Devon S. Johnson,et al.  Cognitive and affective trust in service relationships , 2005 .

[21]  J. R. Moore,et al.  The theory of the growth of the firm twenty-five years after , 1960 .

[22]  Gilbert A. Churchill A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs , 1979 .

[23]  Holger Schiele,et al.  Accessing Supplier Innovation By Being Their Preferred Customer , 2012 .

[24]  H. Håkansson,et al.  Dyadic Business Relationships within a Business Network Context , 1994 .

[25]  Dwayne D. Gremler,et al.  Understanding Relationship Marketing Outcomes , 2002 .

[26]  L. Stern,et al.  Assessing Reseller Performance from the Perspective of the Supplier , 1992 .

[27]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[28]  Jeffrey H. Dyer Specialized supplier networks as a source of competitive advantage : Evidence from the auto industry , 1996 .

[29]  Daniel R. Krause,et al.  Avoid the Pitfalls in Supplier Development , 2000 .

[30]  Rolph E. Anderson,et al.  Multivariate data analysis (4th ed.): with readings , 1995 .

[31]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[32]  A. Wong,et al.  Sustaining company performance through partnering with suppliers , 2002 .

[33]  M. Sheelagh,et al.  Measuring intangible value in business to business buyer-seller relationships: an intellectual capital perspective , 2004 .

[34]  O. Williamson Calculativeness, Trust, and Economic Organization , 1993, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[35]  S. West,et al.  The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. , 1996 .

[36]  J. Steenkamp,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Satisfaction in Marketing Channel Relationships , 1999 .

[37]  S. Hunt,et al.  The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing , 1994 .

[38]  Ik-Whan G. Kwon,et al.  Matter over mind: When specific asset investment affects calculative trust in supply chain partnership , 2006 .

[39]  L. Berry Relationship marketing of services—growing interest, emerging perspectives , 1995 .

[40]  Gary L. Ragatz,et al.  Benefits associated with supplier integration into new product development under conditions of technology uncertainty , 2002 .

[41]  Louise Young,et al.  Evaluating a Model of Industrial Relationship Performance: A Comparison of European and Chinese Results Using the IMP Data Base , 2005 .

[42]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing , 2004 .

[43]  Joseph A. Cote,et al.  Multicollinearity and Measurement Error in Structural Equation Models: Implications for Theory Testing , 2004 .

[44]  D. Ford The Development of Buyer‐Seller Relationships in Industrial Markets , 1980 .

[45]  R. Bennett,et al.  Reputation, trust and supplier commitment: the case of shipping company/seaport relations , 2001 .

[46]  H. Håkansson,et al.  Developing relationships in business networks , 1995 .

[47]  Holger Schiele,et al.  SUPPLIER INNOVATIVENESS AND SUPPLIER PRICING: THE ROLE OF PREFERRED CUSTOMER STATUS , 2010 .

[48]  James A. Narus,et al.  A Model of Distributor Firm and Manufacturer Firm Working Partnerships , 1990 .

[49]  K. Provan,et al.  SUPPLIER COMMITMENT IN RELATIONAL CONTRACT EXCHANGES WITH BUYERS: A STUDY OF INTERORGANIZATIONAL DEPENDENCE AND EXERCISED POWER* , 1994 .

[50]  W. C. Benton,et al.  Supplier evaluations: communication strategies to improve supplier performance , 2004 .

[51]  Terry S. Overton,et al.  Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys , 1977 .

[52]  H. Håkansson International Marketing and Purchasing of Industrial Goods: An Interaction Approach , 1982 .

[53]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet , 2011 .

[54]  A. Payne,et al.  Managing the co-creation of value , 2008 .

[55]  David T. Wilson An integrated model of buyer-seller relationships , 1995 .

[56]  Holger Schiele Early Supplier Integration: The Dual Role of Purchasing in New Product Development , 2010 .

[57]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research , 2012 .

[58]  Sandy D. Jap,et al.  Control Mechanisms and the Relationship Life Cycle: Implications for Safeguarding Specific Investments and Developing Commitment , 2000 .

[59]  Julie K. Huntley Conceptualization and measurement of relationship quality: Linking relationship quality to actual sales and recommendation intention , 2006 .

[60]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[61]  M. Amann,et al.  Supplier satisfaction: Conceptual basics and explorative findings , 2009 .

[62]  David F Ballantyne,et al.  Creating value-in-use through marketing interaction: the exchange logic of relating, communicating and knowing , 2006 .

[63]  D. Dillman Mail and telephone surveys : the total design method , 1979 .

[64]  B. Donaldson,et al.  Relationship Governance Structures and Performance , 2000 .

[65]  A. Gustafsson,et al.  The Effects of Customer Satisfaction, Relationship Commitment Dimensions, and Triggers on Customer Retention , 2005 .

[66]  Jan-Benedict E. M. Steenkamp,et al.  The Effects of Trust and Interdependence on Relationship Commitment , 1996 .

[67]  Robert W. Palmatier,et al.  Factors Influencing the Effectiveness of Relationship Marketing: A Meta-Analysis , 2006 .

[68]  Alexandra Waluszewski,et al.  Conscious use of others’ interface knowledge : how IKEA can keep the price of the Lack table constant over decades , 2007 .

[69]  H. Gemünden,et al.  Value Creation in Buyer–Seller Relationships: Theoretical Considerations and Empirical Results from a Supplier's Perspective , 2001 .

[70]  Robert W. Palmatier,et al.  A Comparative Longitudinal Analysis of Theoretical Perspectives of Interorganizational Relationship Performance , 2007 .

[71]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Toward a transcending conceptualization of relationship: a service‐dominant logic perspective , 2009 .

[72]  Lars-Erik Gadde,et al.  Strategizing in Industrial Networks , 2003 .

[73]  F. Wynstra,et al.  Managing supplier involvement in new product development: A multiple-case study , 2006 .