The supply of new reporting – plethora or pertinent

This paper studies the extent to which present annual reporting practices fulfill the themes of comprehensive business reporting put forth by the Jenkin’s Report and a series of authoritative reports that have emerged in its wake, and thereby examines which types of information suppliers find relevant. In this paper, a content analysis of the annual reports of all the listed companies in the Danish biotech, pharmaceutical and medicotech industry from the fiscal year 2002/03 is conducted. The sample thus includes 13 companies. The empirical analysis uncovers the characteristics of the information that companies voluntarily supply to the capital market in their annual reports. The findings support the cost of disclosure theory, as a strong correlation between disclosure and market capitalization is found. Especially disclosures of corporate governance metrics and social and sustainability disclosures were significantly correlated with firm size. The overall findings indicate an overweight of context-building and branding-related information in the annual reports, suggesting that annual reporting plays a central role in legitimizing the company’s existence and that their content is driven by appropriate corporate action. The analysis confirms that there is a lack of disclosure of forward-oriented types of information which are comparable over time like e.g. value drivers, critical success factors as well as non-financial information. Finally, awareness towards and disclosure of information concerning the effects of voluntary disclosure were found to be non-existent.

[1]  James Guthrie,et al.  Corporate social disclosure practice: a comparative international analysis , 1990 .

[2]  Johan P. Olsen,et al.  Rediscovering institutions: The organizational basis of politics , 1989 .

[3]  Terence Cooke.  Voluntary Corporate Disclosure by Swedish Companies , 1989 .

[4]  Christine Botosan.  Disclosure level and the cost of equity capital , 1997 .

[5]  V. Beattie,et al.  Through the eyes of management:a study of narrative disclosures , 2002 .

[6]  Karina Funk.  Sustainability and Performance , 2003 .

[7]  S. Gray,et al.  Factors Influencing Voluntary Annual Report Disclosures By U.S., U.K. and Continental European Multinational Corporations , 1995 .

[8]  Russell J. Lundholm,et al.  CROSS- SECTIONAL DETERMINANTS OF ANALYST RATINGS OF CORPORATE DISCLOSURES , 1993 .

[9]  John L. Holland.  Corporate Intangibles, Value Relevance and Disclosure Content , 2004 .

[10]  Robert H. Herz,et al.  The ValueReporting Revolution: Moving Beyond the Earnings Game , 2001 .

[11]  Mark H. Lang,et al.  Corporate Disclosure Policy and Analyst Behavior , 1998 .

[12]  George A. Akerlof.  The Market for “Lemons”: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism , 1970 .

[13]  Robert G. Eccles,et al.  Improving the Corporate Disclosure Process , 1995 .

[14]  Jeffrey Unerman.  Methodological issues ‐ Reflections on quantification in corporate social reporting content analysis , 2000 .

[15]  R. Adler,et al.  Exploring the reliability of social and environmental disclosures content analysis , 1999 .

[16]  Wales,et al.  The private shareholder and the corporate report : a report to the Research Committee of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales , 1977 .

[17]  Joel S. Demski,et al.  Accounting Theory: An Information Content Perspective , 2002 .

[18]  Anders H Adrem,et al.  Essays on Disclosure Practices in Sweden - Causes and Effects , 1999 .

[19]  Wayne S. Upton.  Business and financial reporting, challenges from the new economy , 2001 .

[20]  B. Olsson,et al.  Annual reporting practices: Information about human resources in corporate annual reports in major Swedish companies , 2001 .

[21]  Sean W.G. Robb,et al.  Corporate Nonfinancial Disclosure Practices andFinancial Analyst Forecast Ability AcrossThree European Countries , 2003 .

[22]  S. Bartlett,et al.  THE CORPORATE REPORT AND THE PRIVATE SHAREHOLDER: LEE AND TWEEDIE TWENTY YEARS ON , 1997 .

[23]  Baruch Lev,et al.  The Intangible Economy. Impact and Policy Issues , 2001 .

[24]  R. Taffler,et al.  The chairman’s statement ‐ A content analysis of discretionary narrative disclosures , 2000 .

[25]  Peter Söderbaum,et al.  Values, ideology and politics in ecological economics , 1999 .

[26]  H. Bernard,et al.  Data Management and Analysis Methods , 2000 .

[27]  John Arnold,et al.  A Survey of the Methods Used by UK Investment Analysts to Appraise Investments in Ordinary Shares , 1984 .

[28]  P. Oyelere,et al.  Corporate reporting on the Internet: Audit issues and content analysis of practices , 2004 .

[29]  P. Stone,et al.  The Analysis of Communication Content: Developments in Scientific Theories and Computer Techniques , 1969 .

[30]  Richard Pike,et al.  The Appraisal of Ordinary Shares by Investment Analysts in the UK and Germany , 1993 .

[31]  R. Petty,et al.  Using content analysis as a research method to inquire into intellectual capital reporting , 2004 .

[32]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[33]  Clark Eustace,et al.  The intangible economy: impact and policy issues. Report of the European High Level Expert Group on the Intangible Economy , 2000 .

[34]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology , 1980 .

[35]  R. Weber.  Basic Content Analysis , 1986 .

[36]  M. C. Jensen,et al.  Harvard Business School; SSRN; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER); European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI); Harvard University - Accounting & Control Unit , 1976 .

[37]  J. Hunton,et al.  Is Analyst Forecast Accuracy Associated with Accounting Information Use , 1999 .

[38]  John Elkington,et al.  Partnerships from cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st‐century business , 1998 .

[39]  Robert G. Eccles,et al.  Building Public Trust: The Future of Corporate Reporting , 2002 .