A New Method for Depth and Shape Determinations from Magnetic Data

We present in this paper a new formula representing the magnetic anomaly expressions produced by most geological structures. Using the new formula we developed a simple and fast numerical method to determine simultaneously the depth and shape of a buried structure from second-horizontal derivative anomalies obtained from magnetic data with filters of successive window lengths. The method involves using a nonlinear relationship between the depth to the source and the shape factor and a combination of observations at four points with respect to the coordinate of the source center with a free parameter (window length). The relationship represents a parametric family of curves (window curves). For a fixed free parameter, the depth is determined for each shape factor. The computed depths are plotted against the shape factors representing a continuous monotonically increasing curve. The solution for the shape and depth of the buried structure is read at the common intersection of the window curves. This method can be applied to residuals as well as to the observed magnetic data consisting of the combined effect of a local structure and a second-order regional or less. The method is applied to synthetic data with and without random errors and tested on three field examples from India, Brazil and the USA. In all cases the shape and depth of the buried structures are in good agreement with the actual ones.

[1]  K. Soliman,et al.  A new least‐squares minimization approach to depth and shape determination from magnetic data , 2007 .

[2]  João B. C. Silva Transformation of nonlinear problems into linear ones applied to the magnetic field of a two-dimensional prism , 1989 .

[3]  E. Abdelrahman,et al.  Self‐potential data interpretation using standard deviations of depths computed from moving‐average residual anomalies , 2006 .

[4]  P. Hood,et al.  THE DIPPING DIKE CASE: A COMPUTER CURVE‐MATCHING METHOD OF MAGNETIC INTERPRETATION , 1970 .

[5]  B. S. Rao,et al.  a Note on Magnetized SPHERES , 1977 .

[6]  E. Abdelrahman,et al.  Magnetic interpretation using a least-squares, depth-shape curves method , 2005 .

[7]  C. Visweswara Rao,et al.  A computer program for interpreting vertical magnetic anomalies of spheres and horizontal cylinders , 1973 .

[8]  John M. Stanley,et al.  SIMPLIFIED MAGNETIC INTERPRETATION OF THE GEOLOGIC CONTACT AND THIN DIKE , 1977 .

[9]  E. Abdelrahman,et al.  A least-squares variance analysis method for shape and depth estimation from gravity data , 2006 .

[10]  Marcos J. Araúzo-Bravo,et al.  Automatic interpretation of magnetic data based on Euler deconvolution with unprescribed structural index , 2003 .

[11]  S. Hsu Imaging magnetic sources using Euler's equation , 2002 .

[12]  Ahmed Salem,et al.  Linearized least‐squares method for interpretation of potential‐field data from sources of simple geometry , 2004 .

[13]  E. Abdelrahman,et al.  Higher derivatives analysis of 2-D magnetic data , 2001 .

[14]  S. Hammer GRATICULE SPACING VERSUS DEPTH DISCRIMINATION IN GRAVITY INTERPRETATION , 1977 .

[15]  Valéria C. F. Barbosa,et al.  Stability analysis and improvement of structural index estimation in Euler deconvolution , 1999 .

[16]  E. Abdelrahman,et al.  Parametric inversion of residual magnetic anomalies due to simple geometric bodies , 2012 .