Bound context features are integrated at encoding

In the present research, we tested the predictions of different accounts of context binding in “remember” judgements. Context binding, defined as the stochastically dependent retrieval of two different context features, has previously been suggested to be due to mechanisms operating at retrieval either by cueing among context features (Meiser & Bröder, 2002) or by cueing between item and context features (Starns & Hicks, 2008). These accounts, however, do not make specific assumptions regarding the underlying memory representation supporting context binding. By contrast, here we propose that a binding process at encoding integrates item and context information into a coherent memory representation. Varying the presentation of the context features during encoding either with both context features presented simultaneously or with features spread over two encoding episodes, data from two experiments corroborate the notion that binding is produced at encoding. This result suggests that a binding process integrating the context features at encoding is necessary for stochastically dependent retrieval of context features.

[1]  L. Jacoby A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory , 1991 .

[2]  Michael S. Pratte,et al.  Hierarchical single- and dual-process models of recognition memory , 2011 .

[3]  Morten Moshagen,et al.  multiTree: A computer program for the analysis of multinomial processing tree models , 2010, Behavior research methods.

[4]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  Search of associative memory. , 1981 .

[5]  Nicole M Dudukovic,et al.  Remember-Know judgments and retrieval of contextual details. , 2006, Acta psychologica.

[6]  Thorsten Meiser,et al.  Binding of multidimensional context information as a distinctive characteristic of remember judgments. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[7]  Arndt Bröder,et al.  Independent retrieval of source dimensions: an extension of results by Starns and Hicks (2005) and a comment on the ACSIM measure. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[8]  Douglas L. Hintzman,et al.  MINERVA 2: A simulation model of human memory , 1984 .

[9]  A. Yonelinas The Nature of Recollection and Familiarity: A Review of 30 Years of Research , 2002 .

[10]  Arndt Bröder,et al.  Memory for multidimensional source information. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[11]  S. Dewhurst,et al.  Divided attention at retrieval disrupts knowing but not remembering , 2007, Memory.

[12]  Jeffrey J Starns,et al.  Source dimensions are retrieved independently in multidimensional monitoring tasks. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[13]  David M. Riefer,et al.  Theoretical and empirical review of multinomial process tree modeling , 1999, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[14]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  A model for recognition memory: REM—retrieving effectively from memory , 1997, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[15]  R. Baayen,et al.  Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items , 2008 .

[16]  David M. Riefer,et al.  Multinomial processing models of source monitoring. , 1990 .

[17]  U. Bayen,et al.  An evaluation of empirical measures of source identification , 1996, Memory & cognition.

[18]  A. Glenberg,et al.  Component-levels theory of the effects of spacing of repetitions on recall and recognition , 1979, Memory & cognition.

[19]  Melina R. Uncapher,et al.  Episodic Encoding Is More than the Sum of Its Parts: An fMRI Investigation of Multifeatural Contextual Encoding , 2006, Neuron.

[20]  M. Van der Linden,et al.  The effect of ageing on the recollection of emotional and neutral pictures , 2004, Memory.

[21]  J. Wixted,et al.  A continuous dual-process model of remember/know judgments. , 2010, Psychological review.

[22]  A. Yonelinas Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: evidence for a dual-process model. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[23]  Francis S. Bellezza,et al.  Chunking of repeated events in memory , 1989 .

[24]  E. Balint Memory and consciousness. , 1987, The International journal of psycho-analysis.

[25]  P. R. D’Agostino,et al.  Effects of repetition as a function of study-phase retrieval , 1976 .

[26]  G. Hitch,et al.  Cognitive effort and recollective experience in recognition memory. , 1999, Memory.

[27]  C. Sattler,et al.  Boundaries of the relation between conscious recollection and source memory for perceptual details , 2007, Consciousness and Cognition.

[28]  Jeffrey J Starns,et al.  Context attributes in memory are bound to item information, but not to one another , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[29]  Jeroen G. W. Raaijmakers,et al.  Spacing and repetition effects in human memory: application of the SAM model , 2003, Cogn. Sci..

[30]  G. Mandler Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence. , 1980 .

[31]  A. Mayes,et al.  Does Context Discriminate Recollection from Familiarity in Recognition Memory? , 1996, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[32]  Beatrice G. Kuhlmann,et al.  The role of source memory in older adults' recollective experience. , 2012, Psychology and aging.

[33]  B. Hilbig,et al.  Multinomial processing tree models: A review of the literature. , 2009 .

[34]  Suparna Rajaram,et al.  Remembering and knowing: Two means of access to the personal past , 1993, Memory & cognition.

[35]  A J Parkin,et al.  Recollective experience, normal aging, and frontal dysfunction. , 1992, Psychology and aging.

[36]  Douglas L. Hintzman,et al.  "Schema Abstraction" in a Multiple-Trace Memory Model , 1986 .

[37]  E. Erdfelder,et al.  Source discrimination, item detection, and multinomial models of source monitoring. , 1996 .

[38]  V. Gregg,et al.  Recognition memory and awareness: Occurrence of perceptual effects in remembering or in knowing depends on conscious resources at encoding, but not at retrieval , 2006, Memory & cognition.