The Anointed Son, The Hired Gun, and the Chai Wala: Enemies and Insults in Politicians' Tweets in the Run-Up to the 2019 Indian General Elections

This study seeks to assess the prevalence, style, and impact of antagonistic messaging on Twitter in the two years preceding the 2019 Indian General Elections. Focusing on the leadership of the two key parties – the ruling BJP, with Prime Minister Narendra Modi and party president Amit Shah, and the opposition INC’s president Rahul Gandhi, we attempt to understand how the politicians sought to portray each other on Twitter, and how their followers reacted to these characterizations, through the lens of Murray Edelman’s work on the ‘Political Enemy’. By thematically coding tweets and quantitatively analyzing their retweets, we find that negative tweets by and large are significantly more popular for all three politicians, and that the opposition leader allocated a significantly larger proportion of his tweets to attacks. We conclude that while leaders in power and those in opposition may take different stances with messaging, Twitter as a social networking site can perpetuate the online reward for attacking behavior.

[1]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. , 1968 .

[2]  James A. Janack.  The Rhetoric of “The Body:” Jesse Ventura and Bakhtin's Carnival , 2006 .

[3]  C. Jaffrelot.  The Modi-centric BJP 2014 election campaign: new techniques and old tactics , 2015 .

[4]  Peter L. Francia.  Free Media and Twitter in the 2016 Presidential Election , 2018 .

[5]  D. Lilleker.  Presidential Campaigning in the Internet Age , 2014 .

[6]  Kevin C. Desouza,et al.  The 2016 US Presidential Election on Facebook: An Exploratory Analysis of Sentiments , 2018, HICSS.

[7]  P. Howard,et al.  Routledge Handbook of Internet Politics , 2018 .

[8]  Daniel Kreiss.  Taking Our Country Back: The Crafting of Networked Politics from Howard Dean to Barack Obama , 2012 .

[9]  Dominique Brossard,et al.  The "Nasty Effect: " Online Incivility and Risk Perceptions of Emerging Technologies , 2014, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[10]  Bryan T. Gervais.  Rousing the Partisan Combatant: Elite Incivility, Anger, and Antideliberative Attitudes , 2018, Political Psychology.

[11]  Heather K. Evans,et al.  Fear and Loathing on Twitter: Exploring Negative Rhetoric in Tweets During the 2018 Midterm Election , 2019, The Roads to Congress 2018.

[12]  Lindsey Meeks,et al.  Gendered styles, gendered differences: Candidates’ use of personalization and interactivity on Twitter , 2016 .

[13]  Joyojeet Pal,et al.  Political Social Media in the Global South , 2016, I3E.

[14]  David A. Dulio,et al.  New Media and Political Marketing in the United States: 2012 and Beyond , 2012 .

[15]  Anirban K. Baishya,et al.  Selfies| #NaMo: The Political Work of the Selfie in the 2014 Indian General Elections , 2015 .

[16]  Porismita Borah,et al.  Political Facebook use: Campaign strategies used in 2008 and 2012 presidential elections , 2016 .

[17]  Muhammad A. Badarneh.  Carnivalesque politics: A Bakhtinian case study of contemporary Arab political humor , 2011 .

[18]  Murray Edelman,et al.  Constructing the political spectacle , 1989 .

[19]  Eva Johanna Schweitzer.  The Mediatization of E-Campaigning: Evidence From German Party Websites in State, National, and European Parliamentary Elections 2002-2009 , 2012, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[20]  Oliver Posegga,et al.  Characterizing Political Talk on Twitter: A Comparison Between Public Agenda, Media Agendas, and the Twitter Agenda with Regard to Topics and Dynamics , 2019, HICSS.

[21]  Joyojeet Pal,et al.  Speaking their Mind: Populist Style and Antagonistic Messaging in the Tweets of Donald Trump, Narendra Modi, Nigel Farage, and Geert Wilders , 2018, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[22]  J. Pal,et al.  Mediatized Populisms| Innuendo as Outreach: @narendramodi and the Use of Political Irony on Twitter , 2017 .

[23]  Diego Ceccobelli.  Not every day is Election Day: a comparative analysis of eighteen election campaigns on Facebook , 2018 .

[24]  Kajsa E. Dalrymple,et al.  Politics in 140 Characters or Less: Campaign Communication, Network Interaction, and Political Participation on Twitter , 2016 .

[25]  Staci M. Zavattaro.  Brand Obama , 2010 .

[26]  Joyojeet Pal,et al.  Banalities Turned Viral , 2015 .

[27]  C. D. Torre,et al.  Populism and Democracy , 1997 .

[28]  Andreas Jungherr.  Twitter use in election campaigns: A systematic literature review , 2016 .

[29]  Rocío Zamora Medina,et al.  Campaigning on Twitter: Towards the "Personal Style" Campaign to Activate the Political Engagement During the 2011 Spanish General Elections , 2014 .

[30]  Bryan T. Gervais.  More than Mimicry? The Role of Anger in Uncivil Reactions to Elite Political Incivility , 2016 .

[31]  Brian L. Ott.  The age of Twitter: Donald J. Trump and the politics of debasement , 2017 .

[32]  Patrícia G. C. Rossini,et al.  The relationship between race competitiveness, standing in the polls, and social media communication strategies during the 2014 U.S. gubernatorial campaigns , 2018, Journal of Information Technology & Politics.

[33]  Chee-Wee Tan,et al.  Emergent Collaboration on Twitter: A Case Study of the #BlackLivesMatter Movement , 2018, HICSS.

[34]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Sentiment in Twitter events , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[35]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  Metamorphosis of Indian electoral campaigns: Modi's social media experiment , 2015 .

[36]  M. Bakhtin,et al.  Problems of Dostoevsky's Poetics , 1985 .