Pseudohomophone Naming and the Word Frequency Effect

An experiment by McCann and Besner (1987) suggested that non-words that are homophonic with a high-frequency word (e.g. “keap”) are named in the same amount of time as non-words that are homophonic with a low-frequency word (e.g. “fome”), despite such pseudohomophones being faster to name than non-pseudohomophones (e.g. “feap”, “yome”). Such a result is a challenge to any model of lexical processing that places the word-frequency effect at the stage when the word is being selected from amongst all lexical entries. McCann and Besner propose a complex alternative account where frequency effects arise at a later stage of processing, a stage that is not involved in the naming of pseudohomophones. The purpose of the present study is to look for a frequency effect in the naming of pseudohomophones, controlling for orthographic factors that McCann and Besner ignored. The first experiment, using a homophone decision task, establishes a set of items that produce a clear frequency effect. These items are then used in a naming experiment which also reveals a clear frequency effect for those subjects who make use of a lexical route when pronouncing pseudohomophones. It is concluded from this that the complex model developed by McCann and Besner is unnecessary.

[1]  J. Frederiksen,et al.  Spelling and sound: Approaches to the internal lexicon. , 1976 .

[2]  H. Rubenstein,et al.  Evidence for phonemic recoding in visual word recognition , 1971 .

[3]  D. Balota,et al.  The locus of word-frequency effects in the pronunciation task: Lexical access and/or production? ☆ , 1985 .

[4]  R. Schvaneveldt,et al.  Functions of graphemic and phonemic codes in visual word-recognition , 1974, Memory & cognition.

[5]  Thomas H. Killion,et al.  Interaction of visual and cognitive effects in word recognition. , 1977 .

[6]  S. Andrews.  Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Activation or search? , 1989 .

[7]  R W Schvaneveldt,et al.  An activation--verification model for letter and word recognition: the word-superiority effect. , 1982, Psychological review.

[8]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. , 1981 .

[9]  K. Forster,et al.  Criterion bias and search sequence bias in word recognition , 1981, Memory & cognition.

[10]  D. Balota,et al.  Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: part 1.: an account of basic findings , 1988 .

[12]  M. Goldblum.  Psycholinguistics series 2; Structures and processes Edited by J. Morton and J. C. Marshall. P. Elek, London, 1979, 187 pp. £6.50 , 1980, Neuropsychologia.

[13]  S. L. Ehrenreich,et al.  Structure and Search of the Internal Lexicon. , 1979 .

[14]  K. Forster,et al.  Lexical Access and Naming Time. , 1973 .

[15]  M. Taft.  Lexical processing of functionally constrained words , 1990 .

[16]  Marcus Taft,et al.  Reading and the Mental Lexicon , 1991 .

[17]  Roger W. Schvaneveldt,et al.  Frequency and pronounceability in visually presented naming and lexical decision tasks. , 1987 .

[18]  Derek Besner,et al.  Word recognition and identification: Do word-frequency effects reflect lexical access? , 1988 .

[19]  D. Besner,et al.  Reading pseudohomophones: Implications for models of pronunciation assembly and the locus of word-frequency effects in naming. , 1987 .

[20]  Max Coltheart,et al.  Access to the internal lexicon , 1977 .

[21]  C. A. Becker.  Allocation of attention during visual word recognition. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  J. Grainger.  Word frequency and neighborhood frequency effects in lexical decision and naming. , 1990 .

[23]  I Dennis,et al.  Reading without Phonology? , 1985, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[24]  John J. L. Morton,et al.  Interaction of information in word recognition. , 1969 .

[25]  Kenneth I. Forster,et al.  Word frequency and the pronunciation task: The contribution of articulatory fluency , 1990 .

[26]  Jonathan Baron,et al.  Phonological recording and use of spelling-sound rules in reading of sentences , 1983 .

[27]  L. Colombo.  Activation and inhibition with orthographically similar words. , 1986 .

[28]  M Taft,et al.  An alternative to grapheme-phoneme conversion rules? , 1982, Memory & cognition.

[29]  C. P. Whaley.  Word–nonword classification time. , 1978 .

[30]  C. N. Cofer.  Origins of the journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior , 1978 .

[31]  John B. Carroll,et al.  The American Heritage Word Frequency Book , 1971 .

[32]  Michael Garman,et al.  Psycholinguistics: Accessing the mental lexicon , 1990 .