Avoiding disconnection: An evaluation of telephone options for cochlear implant users

Abstract Objective: The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of coupling method on telephone-based speech recognition and perceived listening difficulty in noise for cochlear implant (CI) users. A secondary aim was to evaluate potential impacts of additional processing modifications within coupling conditions, such as activating noise reducing algorithms or muting environmental microphones. Design: Hochmair–Schulz–Moser sentences were bandpass-filtered (300–3400 Hz) and presented unilaterally either via telephone handset or advanced wireless streaming device in a background of cafeteria babble (signal-to-noise ratio =15 dB). Sentence recognition was scored at the word level and perceived listening difficulty was assessed via visual-analogue scale for each of five test conditions. Study sample: Twenty native German-speaking CI users participated. Results: Repeated measures analysis of variance revealed coupling via advanced streaming significantly improved sentence recognition and reduced listening difficulty, when compared to either telecoil or acoustic coupling configurations. In addition, program modifications further increased benefit within a coupling condition. CI users who exhibited the most difficulty during basic acoustic coupling were most likely to benefit from advanced wireless streaming. Conclusion: CI users have several options for improving speech recognition and decreasing listening difficulty over the telephone when listening in noisy environments.

[1]  A prospective study evaluating cochlear implant management skills: development and validation of the Cochlear Implant Management Skills survey , 2016, Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery.

[2]  I. Hochmair-Desoyer,et al.  The HSM sentence test as a tool for evaluating the speech understanding in noise of cochlear implant users. , 1997, The American journal of otology.

[3]  King Chung,et al.  Noise reduction technologies implemented in head-worn preprocessors for improving cochlear implant performance in reverberant noise fields , 2012, Hearing Research.

[4]  Linda Kozma-Spytek,et al.  An evaluation of digital cellular handsets by hearing aid users. , 2005, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[5]  Sergei Kochkin,et al.  MarkeTrak VIII: The efficacy of hearing aids in achieving compensation equity in the workplace , 2010 .

[6]  J C Tannahill Performance characteristics for hearing aid microphone versus telephone and telephone/telecoil reception modes. , 1983, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[7]  J Gertjan Dingemanse,et al.  Application of Noise Reduction Algorithm ClearVoice in Cochlear Implant Processing: Effects on Noise Tolerance and Speech Intelligibility in Noise in Relation to Spectral Resolution , 2015, Ear and hearing.

[8]  J. Ito,et al.  Hearing ability by telephone of patients with cochlear implants , 1999, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[9]  Stefan J. Mauger,et al.  Clinical Evaluation of Signal-to-Noise Ratio–Based Noise Reduction in Nucleus® Cochlear Implant Recipients , 2011, Ear and hearing.

[10]  A. Sismanis,et al.  Telephone Use and Understanding in Patients with Cochlear Implants , 2004, Ear, nose, & throat journal.

[11]  Ben S. Gerber,et al.  Telehealth Weight Management Intervention for Adults with Physical Disabilities: A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2013, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[12]  T Ricketts,et al.  Impact of Noise Source Configuration on Directional Hearing Aid Benefit and Performance , 2000, Ear and hearing.

[13]  P N Plyler,et al.  Telephone communication with in-the-ear hearing aids using acoustic and electromagnetic coupling. , 1998, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[14]  S Hellman,et al.  Effects of noise and noise suppression on speech perception by cochlear implant users. , 1992, Ear and hearing.

[15]  Jace Wolfe,et al.  Benefit of a Commercially Available Cochlear Implant Processor With Dual-Microphone Beamforming: A Multi-Center Study , 2012, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[16]  Emily Tobey,et al.  Hearing Aid Users Benefit from Induction Loop When Using Digital Cellular Phones , 2003, Ear and hearing.

[17]  René H Gifford,et al.  Speech perception for adult cochlear implant recipients in a realistic background noise: effectiveness of preprocessing strategies and external options for improving speech recognition in noise. , 2010, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[18]  Karen A Doherty,et al.  Do experienced hearing aid users know how to use their hearing AIDS correctly? , 2009, American journal of audiology.

[19]  Jerry L. Yanz,et al.  Telecoils: Principles, Pitfalls, Fixes, and the Future , 2003 .

[20]  R. Brey,et al.  The Mayo Clinic Experience with the Cochlear Implant , 1994, Ear, nose, & throat journal.

[21]  Thomas Lenarz,et al.  Results of a Pilot Study With a Signal Enhancement Algorithm for HiRes 120 Cochlear Implant Users , 2010, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[22]  Christine Brenner,et al.  Postlingual adult performance in noise with HiRes 120 and ClearVoice Low, Medium, and High , 2013, Cochlear implants international.

[23]  Erin C. Schafer,et al.  Speech Recognition of Bimodal Cochlear Implant Recipients Using a Wireless Audio Streaming Accessory for the Telephone , 2016, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[24]  Ilona Anderson,et al.  Telephone use: What benefit do cochlear implant users receive? , 2006, International journal of audiology.

[25]  A. Davis,et al.  The benefits of using bluetooth accessories with hearing aids , 2014, International journal of audiology.

[26]  G. Studebaker A "rationalized" arcsine transform. , 1985, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[27]  Bradley McPherson,et al.  Telehealth in audiology: The need and potential to reach underserved communities , 2010, International journal of audiology.

[28]  S B Waltzman,et al.  Telephone Speech Comprehension with Use of the Nucleus Cochlear Implant , 1989, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.

[29]  G. Paludetti,et al.  Improvement of Telephone Communication in Elderly Cochlear Implant Patients , 2015, Audiology and Neurotology.

[30]  J. Gavilán,et al.  Fine structure processing improves telephone speech perception in cochlear implant users , 2013, European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology.

[31]  M Skopec Hearing aid electromagnetic interference from digital wireless telephones. , 1998, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[32]  S A Davidson,et al.  Programmable Telecoil Responses: Potential Advantages for Assistive Listening Device Fittings. , 1994, American journal of audiology.

[33]  Jerry L. Yanz Phones and hearing aids: Issues, resolutions, and a new approach , 2005 .

[34]  Jari Saramäki,et al.  Daily Rhythms in Mobile Telephone Communication , 2015, PloS one.

[35]  J. Gavilán,et al.  Benefits from a mobile telephone adapter in Combi40+ cochlear implant users , 2008, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[36]  Anna Chi Shan Kam,et al.  Evaluation of the ClearVoice Strategy in Adults Using HiResolution Fidelity 120 Sound Processing , 2012, Clinical and experimental otorhinolaryngology.

[37]  Erin M Picou,et al.  Comparison of Wireless and Acoustic Hearing Aid-Based Telephone Listening Strategies , 2011, Ear and hearing.

[38]  Sergei Kochkin,et al.  MarkeTrak VIII: Consumer satisfaction with hearing aids is slowly increasing , 2010 .

[39]  G. Gauchard,et al.  Quality of life and audiologic performance through the ability to phone of cochlear implant users , 2015, European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology.

[40]  Jerome W. Thompson,et al.  Botulinum Toxin for Relief of Bilateral Abductor Paralysis of the Larynx: Histologic Study in an Animal Model , 1989, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[41]  J. Gavilán,et al.  Comparison of different mobile telephones in Combi40 + users , 2006, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[42]  A. Moyal,et al.  THE FEMININE CULTURE OF THE TELEPHONE. PEOPLE, PATTERNS AND POLICY , 1989 .

[43]  J. Thomas Cochlear implantation of the elderly. , 1995, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.

[44]  Erin M Picou,et al.  Efficacy of hearing-aid based telephone strategies for listeners with moderate-to-severe hearing loss. , 2013, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[45]  Jace Wolfe,et al.  Evaluation of a wireless audio streaming accessory to improve mobile telephone performance of cochlear implant users , 2016, International journal of audiology.