Robust Radiomics Feature Quantification Using Semiautomatic Volumetric Segmentation

Due to advances in the acquisition and analysis of medical imaging, it is currently possible to quantify the tumor phenotype. The emerging field of Radiomics addresses this issue by converting medical images into minable data by extracting a large number of quantitative imaging features. One of the main challenges of Radiomics is tumor segmentation. Where manual delineation is time consuming and prone to inter-observer variability, it has been shown that semi-automated approaches are fast and reduce inter-observer variability. In this study, a semiautomatic region growing volumetric segmentation algorithm, implemented in the free and publicly available 3D-Slicer platform, was investigated in terms of its robustness for quantitative imaging feature extraction. Fifty-six 3D-radiomic features, quantifying phenotypic differences based on tumor intensity, shape and texture, were extracted from the computed tomography images of twenty lung cancer patients. These radiomic features were derived from the 3D-tumor volumes defined by three independent observers twice using 3D-Slicer, and compared to manual slice-by-slice delineations of five independent physicians in terms of intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and feature range. Radiomic features extracted from 3D-Slicer segmentations had significantly higher reproducibility (ICC = 0.85±0.15, p = 0.0009) compared to the features extracted from the manual segmentations (ICC = 0.77±0.17). Furthermore, we found that features extracted from 3D-Slicer segmentations were more robust, as the range was significantly smaller across observers (p = 3.819e-07), and overlapping with the feature ranges extracted from manual contouring (boundary lower: p = 0.007, higher: p = 5.863e-06). Our results show that 3D-Slicer segmented tumor volumes provide a better alternative to the manual delineation for feature quantification, as they yield more reproducible imaging descriptors. Therefore, 3D-Slicer can be employed for quantitative image feature extraction and image data mining research in large patient cohorts.

[1]  Philippe Lambin,et al.  Mature results of an individualized radiation dose prescription study based on normal tissue constraints in stages I to III non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  M. Hatt,et al.  Intratumor Heterogeneity Characterized by Textural Features on Baseline 18F-FDG PET Images Predicts Response to Concomitant Radiochemotherapy in Esophageal Cancer , 2011, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[3]  D. Sullivan,et al.  A collaborative enterprise for multi-stakeholder participation in the advancement of quantitative imaging. , 2011, Radiology.

[4]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Textural Features for Image Classification , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[5]  M. Hatt,et al.  Reproducibility of Tumor Uptake Heterogeneity Characterization Through Textural Feature Analysis in 18F-FDG PET , 2012, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[6]  A. Jemal,et al.  Global cancer statistics , 2011, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[7]  P. Lambin,et al.  Stability of FDG-PET Radiomics features: An integrated analysis of test-retest and inter-observer variability , 2013, Acta oncologica.

[8]  James V. Miller,et al.  GBM Volumetry using the 3D Slicer Medical Image Computing Platform , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[9]  Philippe Lambin,et al.  PET-CT-based auto-contouring in non-small-cell lung cancer correlates with pathology and reduces interobserver variability in the delineation of the primary tumor and involved nodal volumes. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[10]  Ferenc A. Jolesz,et al.  Radiogenomic Mapping of Edema/Cellular Invasion MRI-Phenotypes in Glioblastoma Multiforme , 2011, PloS one.

[11]  P. Lambin,et al.  Decoding tumour phenotype by noninvasive imaging using a quantitative radiomics approach , 2014, Nature Communications.

[12]  M. Martel,et al.  High quality machine-robust image features: identification in nonsmall cell lung cancer computed tomography images. , 2013, Medical physics.

[13]  Jie Tian,et al.  Automated delineation of lung tumors from CT images using a single click ensemble segmentation approach , 2013, Pattern Recognit..

[14]  Balaji Ganeshan,et al.  Texture analysis of non-small cell lung cancer on unenhanced computed tomography: initial evidence for a relationship with tumour glucose metabolism and stage , 2010, Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society.

[15]  Mary M. Galloway,et al.  Texture analysis using gray level run lengths , 1974 .

[16]  Tobias Schaeffter,et al.  Reproducibility of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging: why we should care. , 2013, Radiology.

[17]  Joseph O Deasy,et al.  CERR: a computational environment for radiotherapy research. , 2003, Medical physics.

[18]  K. Miles,et al.  Tumour heterogeneity in non-small cell lung carcinoma assessed by CT texture analysis: a potential marker of survival , 2012, European Radiology.

[19]  G. McLennan,et al.  Quantitative imaging test approval and biomarker qualification: interrelated but distinct activities. , 2011, Radiology.

[20]  Issam El-Naqa,et al.  Exploring feature-based approaches in PET images for predicting cancer treatment outcomes , 2009, Pattern Recognit..

[21]  Andre Dekker,et al.  Radiomics: the process and the challenges. , 2012, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[22]  V. Goh,et al.  Non-small cell lung cancer: histopathologic correlates for texture parameters at CT. , 2013, Radiology.

[23]  Patrick Granton,et al.  Radiomics: extracting more information from medical images using advanced feature analysis. , 2012, European journal of cancer.

[24]  Andre Dekker,et al.  A semiautomatic CT-based ensemble segmentation of lung tumors: comparison with oncologists' delineations and with the surgical specimen. , 2012, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[25]  R. Jeraj,et al.  Variability of textural features in FDG PET images due to different acquisition modes and reconstruction parameters , 2010, Acta oncologica.

[26]  P. Lambin,et al.  Decoding tumour phenotype by noninvasive imaging using a quantitative radiomics approach , 2014, Nature Communications.

[27]  Ron Kikinis,et al.  Volumetric CT-based segmentation of NSCLC using 3D-Slicer , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[28]  Steven R. Breault,et al.  Reproducibility of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Part II. Comparison of intra- and interobserver variability with manual region of interest placement versus semiautomatic lesion segmentation and histogram analysis. , 2013, Radiology.

[29]  Howard Y. Chang,et al.  Decoding global gene expression programs in liver cancer by noninvasive imaging , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.

[30]  J. Bradley,et al.  Combined PET/CT image characteristics for radiotherapy tumor response in lung cancer. , 2012, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[31]  Pascal O. Zinn,et al.  A Novel Volume-Age-KPS (VAK) Glioblastoma Classification Identifies a Prognostic Cognate microRNA-Gene Signature , 2012, PloS one.

[32]  K. McGraw,et al.  Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. , 1996 .