Multimodal wireless sensor networks based on Wake-up radio receivers: An nalytical model for energy consumption

Traditionally, sophisticate power-aware wake-up techniques have been employed to achieve energy efficiency in Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs), such as low-duty cycling protocols using a single radio architecture. These protocols achieve good results regarding energy savings, but they suffer from idle-listening and overhearing issues, that make them not reliable for most ultra-low power demanding applications, especially, those deployed in hostile and unattended environments. Currently, Wake-up Radio Receivers (WuRx) based protocols, under a dual-radio architecture and always-on operation, are emerging as a solution to overcome these issues, promising higher energy consumption reduction compared to classic wake-up protocols. By combining different transceivers and reporting protocols regarding energy efficiency, multimodality in WSNs is achieved. This paper presents an energy consumption estimation model that considers the behavior and performance of wake-up protocols based on WuRx in multi-hop communications under several cases instead of traditional low-duty cycling schemes. The results show that the WuRx with addressing does not significantly reduce the energy consumption compared to WuRx without addressing. In some cases, classic low-duty cycling protocols outperform WuRx based protocols, but in most cases, it is contrariwise, giving a strong motivation for considering multi-modal approaches in WSNs.

[1]  Rajeev Piyare,et al.  WaCo: A Wake-Up Radio COOJA Extension for Simulating Ultra Low Power Radios , 2017, EWSN.

[2]  Ove Edfors,et al.  Influence of Duty-Cycled Wake-Up Receiver Characteristics on Energy Consumption in Single-Hop Networks , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[3]  Rajeev Piyare,et al.  Ultra Low Power Wake-Up Radios: A Hardware and Networking Survey , 2017, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[4]  Marie-Paule Uwase,et al.  Experimental Comparison of Radio Duty Cycling Protocols for Wireless Sensor Networks , 2017, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[5]  Frank Y. Li,et al.  Does Wake-Up Radio Always Consume Lower Energy Than Duty-Cycled Protocols? , 2017, 2017 IEEE 86th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC-Fall).

[6]  Christian Schindelhauer,et al.  T-ROME: A simple and energy efficient tree routing protocol for low-power wake-up receivers , 2017, Ad Hoc Networks.

[7]  Guido Dolmans,et al.  Analytical Models for the Wake-Up Receiver Power Budget for Wireless Sensor Networks , 2009, GLOBECOM 2009 - 2009 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference.

[8]  Mario Schölzel,et al.  An Energy Consumption Model for MultiModal Wireless Sensor Networks based on Wake-up Radio Receivers , 2018, 2018 IEEE Colombian Conference on Communications and Computing (COLCOM).

[9]  Juan Aranda,et al.  Enhanced multimodal switching mechanisms for node scheduling and data gathering in wireless sensor networks , 2017, 2017 IEEE Colombian Conference on Communications and Computing (COLCOM).

[10]  Ilker Demirkol,et al.  Has Time Come to Switch From Duty-Cycled MAC Protocols to Wake-Up Radio for Wireless Sensor Networks? , 2016, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[11]  Djamel Djenouri,et al.  MAC Protocols With Wake-Up Radio for Wireless Sensor Networks: A Review , 2017, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[12]  Yan Zhang,et al.  An analytical model for energy efficiency analysis of different wakeup radio schemes , 2009, 2009 IEEE 20th International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications.

[13]  Kyung Sup Kwak,et al.  A power efficient MAC protocol for wireless body area networks , 2012, EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking.