Patents and the Performance of Voluntary Standard Setting Organizations

Voluntary standard-setting organizations (SSOs) are a common feature of systems industries, where firms supply interoperable components for a shared technology platform. These institutions promote coordinated innovation by providing a forum for collective decision making and a potential solution to the problem of fragmented and overlapping intellectual property rights. This paper examines the economic and technological significance of SSOs by analyzing the flow of citations to a sample of U.S. patents disclosed during the standard-setting process. Our main results show that the age distribution of SSO patent citations is shifted toward later years (relative to an average patent) and that citations increase substantially following standardization. These results suggest that SSOs identify promising technologies and influence their subsequent adoption.

[1]  J. Tirole,et al.  The Rules of Standard Setting Organizations: An Empirical Analysis , 2005 .

[2]  M.A. Cusumano,et al.  The elements of platform leadership , 2003, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[3]  Neil Gandal,et al.  The Dynamics of Technological Adoption in Hardware/Software Systems , 1997 .

[4]  Jerry Kaplan,et al.  Startup: A Silicon Valley Adventure , 1995 .

[5]  Stuart J. H. Graham,et al.  Competing on Standards? Entrepreneurship, Intellectual Property and the Platform Paradox , 2007 .

[6]  R. Grant.  Contemporary Strategy Analysis: Concepts, Techniques, Applications , 1991 .

[7]  D. Harhoff,et al.  Citation Frequency and the Value of Patented Inventions , 1999, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[8]  Gregory Tassey,et al.  Methods for Assessing the Economic Impacts of Government R&D , 2003 .

[9]  Joseph Farrell,et al.  Installed base and compatibility : innovation, product preannouncements and predation , 1986 .

[10]  Timothy F. Bresnahan,et al.  Technological Competition and the Structure of the Computer Industry , 2003 .

[11]  Marcin Strojwas,et al.  Cooperative Marketing Agreements between Competitors: Evidence from Patent Pools , 2003 .

[12]  Josh Lerner,et al.  STANDARD SETTING, PATENTS, AND HOLD-UP , 2007 .

[13]  Mark A. Lemley.  Intellectual Property Rights and Standard-Setting Organizations , 2002 .

[14]  J. M. Buchanan,et al.  An Economic Theory of Clubs , 1965 .

[15]  Adam B. Jaffe,et al.  Innovation and its Discontents , 2004 .

[16]  M. Morelli,et al.  Self Enforcing Voting in International Organizations , 2003 .

[17]  M. Trajtenberg,et al.  Patents, Citations and Innovations , 2002 .

[18]  Z. Griliches,et al.  Econometric Models for Count Data with an Application to the Patents-R&D Relationship , 1984 .

[19]  Neil Gandal,et al.  Intellectual Property and Standardization Committee Participation in the Us Modem Industry , 2004 .

[20]  Isabelle Liotard,et al.  Les nouvelles facettes de la propriété intellectuelle : stratégies, attaques et menaces , 2007 .

[21]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility , 1985 .

[22]  Rudi Bekkers,et al.  Intellectual Property Rights, Strategic Technology Agreements and Market Structure, The Case of GSM , 2002 .

[23]  Josh Lerner,et al.  A Model of Forum Shopping , 2006 .

[24]  P. David,et al.  The Economics Of Compatibility Standards: An Introduction To Recent Research 1 , 1990 .

[25]  C. Shapiro.  Setting Compatibility Standards: Cooperation or Collusion? , 2000 .

[26]  Marc Rysman,et al.  Identifying the Age Profile of Patent Citations , 2006 .

[27]  S. Besen,et al.  Compatibility Standards, Competition, and Innovation in the Broadcasting Industry , 1986 .

[28]  Marvin A. Sirbu,et al.  Technological Choice in Voluntary Standards Committees: An Empirical Analysis. , 1990 .

[29]  Joseph Farrell,et al.  Choosing the Rules for Formal Standardization , 2002 .

[30]  Stan J. Liebowitz,et al.  The Fable of the Keys , 1990, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[31]  Joseph Farrell,et al.  The role of the ITU in standardization: Pre-eminence, impotence or rubber stamp? , 1991 .

[32]  Bronwyn H Hall,et al.  Market value and patent citations , 2005 .

[33]  A. D. Minin,et al.  A case for non-globalization? The organisation of r&d in the wireless telecommunications industry , 2006 .

[34]  M. Trajtenberg,et al.  Universities as a Source of Commercial Technology: A Detailed Analysis of University Patenting, 19651988 , 1995, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[35]  Hal R. Varian,et al.  Information rules - a strategic guide to the network economy , 1999 .

[36]  J. Wooldridge.  Distribution-free estimation of some nonlinear panel data models , 1999 .

[37]  Joseph Farrell,et al.  Coordination Through Committees and Markets , 1987 .

[38]  A. Gawer,et al.  Platform Owner Entry and Innovation in Complementary Markets: Evidence from Intel , 2005 .

[39]  Manuel Trajtenberg,et al.  Patents, Citations, and Innovations: A Window on the Knowledge Economy , 2002 .

[40]  Shane Greenstein,et al.  Standards and Public Policy , 2006 .

[41]  A. Leiponen.  Competing through cooperation: Standard setting in wireless telecommunications , 2006 .

[42]  P. David.  Clio and the Economics of QWERTY , 1985 .

[43]  Carl F. Cargill,et al.  Open systems standardization : a business approach , 1997 .

[44]  David C. Mowery,et al.  Is the Internet a US invention?—an economic and technological history of computer networking , 2002 .

[45]  Thomas P. Lyon,et al.  Self-Regulation and Social Welfare: The Political Economy of Corporate Environmentalism , 1998 .