TuBaFrost 4: access rules and incentives for a European tumour bank.

When designing infrastructure for a networked virtual tumour bank (samples remain at the collector institutes and sample data are collected in a searchable central database), it is apparent that this can only function properly after developing an adequate set of rules for use and access. These rules must include sufficient incentives for the tissue sample collectors to remain active within the network and maintain sufficient sample levels in the local bank. These requirements resulted in a key TuBaFrost rule, stating that the custodianship of the samples remains under the authority of the local collector. As a consequence, the samples and the decision to issue the samples to a requestor are not transferred to a large organisation but instead remain with the collector, thus allowing autonomous negotiation between collector and requestor, potential co-authorship in publications or compensation for collection and processing costs. Furthermore, it realises a streamlined cost effective network, ensuring tissue visibility and accessibility thereby improving the availability of large amounts of samples of highly specific or rare tumour types as well as providing contact opportunities for collaboration between scientists with cutting edge technology and tissue collectors. With this general purpose in mind, the rules and responsibilities for collectors, requestors and central office were generated.

[1]  Yudong D. He,et al.  A Gene-Expression Signature as a Predictor of Survival in Breast Cancer , 2002 .

[2]  K Knox,et al.  Establishing a national tissue bank for surgically harvested cancer tissue , 2004, The British journal of surgery.

[3]  M M Morente,et al.  TuBaFrost 1: Uniting local frozen tumour banks into a European network: an overview. , 2006, European journal of cancer.

[4]  D. H. Farkas,et al.  Specimen collection and storage for diagnostic molecular pathology investigation. , 1996, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[5]  W E Grizzle,et al.  Establishing a tumour bank: banking, informatics and ethics , 2004, British Journal of Cancer.

[6]  P. Quirke,et al.  Pathology--a molecular prognostic approach. , 2002, British medical bulletin.

[7]  Evert-Ben van Veen,et al.  Tumour banks: well-guarded treasures in the interest of patients , 2003, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[8]  M M Morente,et al.  TuBaFrost 2: Standardising tissue collection and quality control procedures for a European virtual frozen tissue bank network. , 2006, European journal of cancer.

[9]  Yudong D. He,et al.  Expression profiling predicts outcome in breast cancer , 2002, Breast Cancer Research.

[10]  V. Weedn,et al.  Recommended policies for uses of human tissue in research, education, and quality control. Ad Hoc Committee on Stored Tissue, College of American Pathologists. , 2009, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[11]  William Stafford Noble,et al.  Classification and subtype prediction of adult soft tissue sarcoma by functional genomics. , 2003, The American journal of pathology.

[12]  A. Abati,et al.  Looking forward in diagnostic pathology: The molecular superhighway , 1996, Cancer.

[13]  G. Berglund,et al.  Feasibility and quality of biological banking of human normal and tumor tissue specimens as sources of DNA for the Malmö Diet and Cancer Study. , 1998, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[14]  T. Pretlow,et al.  The cooperative human tissue network. An update , 1993, Cancer.

[15]  H. Lai,et al.  A research-based tumor tissue bank of gynecologic oncology: characteristics of nucleic acids extracted from normal and tumor tissues from different sites , 2001, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.