Nonuniform charge scaling (NUCS): A practical approximation of solvent electrostatic screening in proteins

In molecular mechanics calculations, electrostatic interactions between chemical groups are usually represented by a Coulomb potential between the partial atomic charges of the groups. In aqueous solution these interactions are modified by the polarizable solvent. Although the electrostatic effects of the polarized solvent on the protein are well described by the Poisson–Boltzmann equation, its numerical solution is computationally expensive for large molecules such as proteins. The procedure of nonuniform charge scaling (NUCS) is a pragmatic approach to implicit solvation that approximates the solvent screening effect by individually scaling the partial charges on the explicit atoms of the macromolecule so as to reproduce electrostatic interaction energies obtained from an initial Poisson–Boltzmann analysis. Once the screening factors have been determined for a protein the scaled charges can be easily used in any molecular mechanics program that implements a Coulomb term. The approach is particularly suitable for minimization‐based simulations, such as normal mode analysis, certain conformational reaction path or ligand binding techniques for which bulk solvent cannot be included explicitly, and for combined quantum mechanical/molecular mechanical calculations when the interface to more elaborate continuum solvent models is lacking. The method is illustrated using reaction path calculations of the Tyr35 ring flip in the bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Comput Chem 26: 1359–1371, 2005

[1]  Charles L. Brooks,et al.  CHARGE SCREENING AND THE DIELECTRIC CONSTANT OF PROTEINS : INSIGHTS FROM MOLECULAR DYNAMICS , 1996 .

[2]  Marcin Król,et al.  Comparison of various implicit solvent models in molecular dynamics simulations of immunoglobulin G light chain dimer , 2003, J. Comput. Chem..

[3]  Thomas Simonson,et al.  Free energy simulations come of age: protein-ligand recognition. , 2002, Accounts of chemical research.

[4]  B. Rupp,et al.  Structure of bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor at 125 K definition of carboxyl-terminal residues Gly57 and Ala58. , 1996, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[5]  M. Vaney,et al.  High-resolution structure (1.33 A) of a HEW lysozyme tetragonal crystal grown in the APCF apparatus. Data and structural comparison with a crystal grown under microgravity from SpaceHab-01 mission. , 1996, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[6]  J. Andrew McCammon,et al.  Influence of Structural Fluctuation on Enzyme Reaction Energy Barriers in Combined Quantum Mechanical/Molecular Mechanical Studies , 2003 .

[7]  D. Truhlar,et al.  Quantum mechanical methods for enzyme kinetics. , 2003, Annual review of physical chemistry.

[8]  M. Karplus,et al.  Solution conformations and thermodynamics of structured peptides: molecular dynamics simulation with an implicit solvation model. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[9]  Arieh Warshel,et al.  Energetics and Dynamics of Enzymatic Reactions , 2001 .

[10]  M. Karplus,et al.  Docking by Monte Carlo minimization with a solvation correction: Application to an FKBP—substrate complex , 1997 .

[11]  Stefan Fischer,et al.  Pathway for large-scale conformational change in annexin V. , 2000, Biochemistry.

[12]  Emil Alexov,et al.  Comparative study of generalized born models: Born radii and peptide folding. , 2005, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[13]  Jeremy C. Smith,et al.  How well does charge reparametrisation account for solvent screening in molecular mechanics calculations? The example of myosin , 2003, Silico Biol..

[14]  Amedeo Caflisch,et al.  A sphere-based model for the electrostatics of globular proteins. , 2003, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[15]  J. D. Morgan,et al.  Molecular dynamics of ferrocytochrome c. Magnitude and anisotropy of atomic displacements. , 1981, Journal of molecular biology.

[16]  Peter A. Kollman,et al.  Conformational and energetic effects of truncating nonbonded interactions in an aqueous protein dynamics simulation , 1993, J. Comput. Chem..

[17]  M. Karplus,et al.  Conjugate peak refinement: an algorithm for finding reaction paths and accurate transition states in systems with many degrees of freedom , 1992 .

[18]  T. Hynes,et al.  The crystal structure of staphylococcal nuclease refined at 1.7 Å resolution , 1991, Proteins.

[19]  B Honig,et al.  Reconciling the magnitude of the microscopic and macroscopic hydrophobic effects. , 1991, Science.

[20]  D. Pérahia,et al.  Internal and interfacial dielectric properties of cytochrome c from molecular dynamics in aqueous solution. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  B. Honig,et al.  Classical electrostatics in biology and chemistry. , 1995, Science.

[22]  B. Dominy,et al.  Development of a generalized Born model parameterization for proteins and nucleic acids , 1999 .

[23]  M. Karplus,et al.  A Comprehensive Analytical Treatment of Continuum Electrostatics , 1996 .

[24]  I. Tuñón,et al.  Molecular surface area and hydrophobic effect. , 1992, Protein engineering.

[25]  M Karplus,et al.  The missing link between thermodynamics and structure in F1-ATPase , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  Stefan Fischer,et al.  Molecular dynamics simulation reveals a surface salt bridge forming a kinetic trap in unfolding of truncated Staphylococcal nuclease , 2003, Proteins.

[27]  W. C. Still,et al.  The GB/SA Continuum Model for Solvation. A Fast Analytical Method for the Calculation of Approximate Born Radii , 1997 .

[28]  M. Karplus,et al.  Simulation of activation free energies in molecular systems , 1996 .

[29]  Fabrice Leclerc,et al.  Effective atom volumes for implicit solvent models: comparison between Voronoi volumes and minimum fluctuation volumes , 2001, J. Comput. Chem..

[30]  David A. Case,et al.  Effective Born radii in the generalized Born approximation: The importance of being perfect , 2002, J. Comput. Chem..

[31]  Arieh Warshel,et al.  Microscopic simulations of macroscopic dielectric constants of solvated proteins , 1991 .

[32]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. , 1998, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[33]  W. Im,et al.  Continuum solvation model: Computation of electrostatic forces from numerical solutions to the Poisson-Boltzmann equation , 1998 .

[34]  Stefan Fischer,et al.  Translocation mechanism of long sugar chains across the maltoporin membrane channel. , 2002, Structure.

[35]  Alan E. Mark,et al.  Dielectric properties of trypsin inhibitor and lysozyme calculated from molecular dynamics simulations , 1993 .

[36]  J. Bertrán,et al.  Preorganization and reorganization as related factors in enzyme catalysis: the chorismate mutase case. , 2003, Chemistry.

[37]  Charles L. Brooks,et al.  Performance comparison of generalized born and Poisson methods in the calculation of electrostatic solvation energies for protein structures , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[38]  K C Holmes,et al.  Structural mechanism of muscle contraction. , 1999, Annual review of biochemistry.

[39]  K. Wüthrich,et al.  Dynamics of the aromatic amino acid residues in the globular conformation of the basic pancreatic trypsin inhibitor (BPTI) , 1976, Biophysics of structure and mechanism.

[40]  T. Schlick Molecular modeling and simulation , 2002 .

[41]  K. Tasaki,et al.  Observations concerning the treatment of long‐range interactions in molecular dynamics simulations , 1993, J. Comput. Chem..

[42]  M. Karplus,et al.  CHARMM: A program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations , 1983 .

[43]  D. Beglov,et al.  Atomic Radii for Continuum Electrostatics Calculations Based on Molecular Dynamics Free Energy Simulations , 1997 .

[44]  D. Case,et al.  Generalized born models of macromolecular solvation effects. , 2000, Annual review of physical chemistry.

[45]  Sergio A Hassan,et al.  Molecular dynamics simulations of peptides and proteins with a continuum electrostatic model based on screened Coulomb potentials , 2003, Proteins.

[46]  W. C. Still,et al.  Semianalytical treatment of solvation for molecular mechanics and dynamics , 1990 .

[47]  T. Simonson,et al.  Protein molecular dynamics with the generalized born/ACE solvent model , 2001, Proteins.

[48]  B. Brooks,et al.  The effects of truncating long‐range forces on protein dynamics , 1989, Proteins.

[49]  Bernard R. Brooks,et al.  New spherical‐cutoff methods for long‐range forces in macromolecular simulation , 1994, J. Comput. Chem..

[50]  U. Singh,et al.  A NEW FORCE FIELD FOR MOLECULAR MECHANICAL SIMULATION OF NUCLEIC ACIDS AND PROTEINS , 1984 .

[51]  B. Honig,et al.  A rapid finite difference algorithm, utilizing successive over‐relaxation to solve the Poisson–Boltzmann equation , 1991 .

[52]  K. Wüthrich,et al.  Disulfide bond isomerization in BPTI and BPTI(G36S): an NMR study of correlated mobility in proteins. , 1993, Biochemistry.

[53]  M. Karplus,et al.  A mechanism for rotamase catalysis by the FK506 binding protein (FKBP). , 1993, Biochemistry.

[54]  T. Darden,et al.  Molecular dynamics simulations of biomolecules: long-range electrostatic effects. , 1999, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[55]  L. R. Scott,et al.  Electrostatics and diffusion of molecules in solution: simulations with the University of Houston Brownian dynamics program , 1995 .

[56]  Thomas Simonson,et al.  Continuum Treatment of Long-Range Interactions in Free Energy Calculations. Application to Protein−Ligand Binding. , 1997 .

[57]  Martin Karplus,et al.  Aspects of Protein Reaction Dynamics: Deviations from Simple Behavior , 2000 .

[58]  M. Karplus,et al.  A charge-scaling method to treat solvent in QM/MM simulations , 2003 .

[59]  M Karplus,et al.  Dynamical theory of activated processes in globular proteins. , 1982, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.