Legibility and visual fatigue affected by text direction, screen size and character size on color LCD e-reader

Abstract As a portable mobile device, the e-book reader (e-reader) facilitates text-reading. With the color LCD e-reader employed, this study was aimed to investigate how legibility and visual fatigue are affected by different text directions, screen sizes, and character sizes. Following the experimental method, 60 participants were required to read the Chinese texts in the Ming typeface and to search out the target words in the pseudo-texts. Meanwhile, they were connected to an exclusive database through the Internet. The experimental data, such as the search time, accuracy rate, critical fusion frequency (CFF), and subjective visual fatigue, were recorded in the database as well as analyzed. It was discovered that text direction, screen size, and character size all produced an effect on search time. On the 6″ or 9.7″ screen, 12 pt took the shortest search time. By contrast, the 8.1″ screen was suitable for both 12 pt and 14 pt. Furthermore, the character size exerted an influence on the accuracy rate. 12 pt and 14 pt were suitable for the e-reader on the 9.7″ screen. In addition, the small character size of the text was the main cause of visual fatigue. The results of this study can be used as a reference to design the color LCD e-reader.

[1]  Hyojung Seo,et al.  Head-free reading of horizontally and vertically arranged texts , 2002, Vision Research.

[2]  H. Heuer,et al.  [Rest position of the eyes and its effect on viewing distance and visual fatigue in computer display work]. , 1989, Zeitschrift fur experimentelle und angewandte Psychologie.

[3]  Barbara S. Chaparro,et al.  Comparing the effects of text size and format on the readibility of computer-displayed Times New Roman and Arial text , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[4]  Jodi Forlizzi,et al.  A study of fonts designed for screen display , 1998, CHI.

[5]  Barbara S. Chaparro,et al.  Examining children's reading performance and preference for different computer-displayed text , 2002, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[6]  Ching-Torng Lin,et al.  Ergonomic evaluation of three popular Chinese e-book displays for prolonged reading , 2007 .

[7]  Kong-King Shieh,et al.  Lighting, font style, and polarity on visual performance and visual fatigue with electronic paper displays , 2009, Displays.

[8]  H Herman Bouma,et al.  Visual reading processes and the quality of text displays , 1980 .

[9]  Carol Bergfeld,et al.  Reading text from computer screens , 1987, CSUR.

[10]  G. Legge,et al.  Psychophysics of reading—I. Normal vision , 1985, Vision Research.

[11]  Mary C. Dyson,et al.  The influence of reading speed and line length on the effectiveness of reading from screen , 2001, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[12]  Alan H. S. Chan,et al.  Effect of display factors on Chinese reading times, comprehension scores and preferences , 2005, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[13]  Haruo Isono,et al.  Measurement of Visual Fatigue from Reading on Electronic Paper , 2004 .

[14]  N Osaka,et al.  Optimal viewing position in vertically and horizontally presented Japanese words , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[15]  Kong-King Shieh,et al.  Effect of character size and lighting on legibility of electronic papers , 2008, Displays.

[16]  Kenneth M Heilman,et al.  Spatial bias: effects of early reading direction on Korean subjects , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[17]  Manlai You,et al.  The legibility threshold of Chinese characters in three-type styles , 2001 .

[18]  Mary C. Dyson,et al.  The legibility of screen formats: are three columns better than one? , 1997, Comput. Graph..

[19]  Insup Taylor,et al.  Writing and Literacy in Chinese, Korean and Japanese , 1995 .

[20]  Jaj Jacques Roufs,et al.  Text quality metrics for visual display units : II. an experimental survey , 1997 .

[21]  P A Kolers,et al.  Readability of Text Scrolled on Visual Display Terminals as a Function of Window Size , 1983, Human factors.

[22]  Stephen A. Brewster,et al.  The Effect of Age and Font Size on Reading Text on Handheld Computers , 2005, INTERACT.

[23]  G. Legge,et al.  Comparing reading speed for horizontal and vertical English text. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[24]  Andrew Dillon,et al.  The effects of display size and text splitting on reading lengthy text from screen , 1990 .

[25]  Sheue-Ling Hwang,et al.  Investigation of legibility and visual fatigue for simulated flexible electronic paper under various surface treatments and ambient illumination conditions. , 2009, Applied ergonomics.

[26]  Ying Liu,et al.  Effects of font size, display resolution and task type on reading Chinese fonts from mobile devices. , 2009 .

[27]  Rungtai Lin,et al.  Usability evaluation of E-books , 2009, Displays.

[28]  Jennie P. Psihogios,et al.  The effects of video display terminal height on the operator: a comparison of the 15° and 40° recommendations , 1998 .

[29]  Thomas S. Tullis,et al.  Readability of fonts in the windows environment , 1995, CHI 95 Conference Companion.

[30]  R. D. Freeman,et al.  Visual acuity is better for letters in rows than in columns , 1980, Nature.

[31]  K. Koda,et al.  Alphabetic and nonalphabetic L1 effects in English word identification: a comparison of Korean and Chinese English L2 learners , 2003, Cognition.

[32]  Kong-King Shieh,et al.  Effects of screen type, ambient illumination, and color combination on VDT visual performance and subjective preference , 2000 .