Geometry-Driven Cell Organization Determines Tissue Growths in Scaffold Pores: Consequences for Fibronectin Organization

To heal tissue defects, cells have to bridge gaps and generate new extracellular matrix (ECM). Macroporous scaffolds are frequently used to support the process of defect filling and thus foster tissue regeneration. Such biomaterials contain micro-voids (pores) that the cells fill with their own ECM over time. There is only limited knowledge on how pore geometry influences cell organization and matrix production, even though it is highly relevant for scaffold design. This study hypothesized that 1) a simple geometric description predicts cellular organization during pore filling at the cell level and that 2) pore closure results in a reorganization of ECM. Scaffolds with a broad distribution of pore sizes (macroporous starPEG-heparin cryogel) were used as a model system and seeded with primary fibroblasts. The strategies of cells to fill pores could be explained by a simple geometrical model considering cells as tensioned chords. The model matched qualitatively as well as quantitatively by means of cell number vs. open cross-sectional area for all pore sizes. The correlation between ECM location and cell position was higher when the pores were not filled with tissue (Pearson’s coefficient ρ = 0.45±0.01) and reduced once the pores were closed (ρ = 0.26±0.04) indicating a reorganization of the cell/ECM network. Scaffold pore size directed the time required for pore closure and furthermore impacted the organization of the fibronectin matrix. Understanding how cells fill micro-voids will help to design biomaterial scaffolds that support the endogenous healing process and thus allow a fast filling of tissue defects.

[1]  Kenneth M. Yamada,et al.  Direct comparisons of the morphology, migration, cell adhesions, and actin cytoskeleton of fibroblasts in four different three-dimensional extracellular matrices. , 2011, Tissue engineering. Part A.

[2]  Kyriacos Zygourakis,et al.  A 3D hybrid model for tissue growth: the interplay between cell population and mass transport dynamics. , 2009, Biophysical journal.

[3]  P. Janmey,et al.  Tissue Cells Feel and Respond to the Stiffness of Their Substrate , 2005, Science.

[4]  Hans G Othmer,et al.  Multi-scale models of cell and tissue dynamics , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[5]  H. Senoo,et al.  L‐ascorbic acid 2‐phosphate stimulates collagen accumulation, cell proliferation, and formation of a three‐dimensional tissuelike substance by skin fibroblasts , 1989, Journal of cellular physiology.

[6]  Lu Jianxi,et al.  The effect of pore size on tissue ingrowth and neovascularization in porous bioceramics of controlled architecture in vivo , 2011, Biomedical materials.

[7]  Alexander A Spector,et al.  Emergent patterns of growth controlled by multicellular form and mechanics. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  Ming-Huei Cheng,et al.  The role of pore size on vascularization and tissue remodeling in PEG hydrogels. , 2011, Biomaterials.

[9]  Peter Fratzl,et al.  The effect of geometry on three-dimensional tissue growth , 2008, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[10]  S. Hollister Porous scaffold design for tissue engineering , 2005, Nature materials.

[11]  K. Fujiwara,et al.  Collagen I matrix turnover is regulated by fibronectin polymerization. , 2010, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[12]  G J Brakenhoff,et al.  Dynamics of three-dimensional replication patterns during the S-phase, analysed by double labelling of DNA and confocal microscopy. , 1992, Journal of cell science.

[13]  C. Werner,et al.  Using Mean Field Theory to Guide Biofunctional Materials Design , 2012 .

[14]  M. Sheetz,et al.  Local force and geometry sensing regulate cell functions , 2006, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[15]  H. Sorg,et al.  Wound Repair and Regeneration , 2012, European Surgical Research.

[16]  Michael T Longaker,et al.  The fibroblast‐populated collagen matrix as a model of wound healing: a review of the evidence , 2004, Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society.

[17]  D. E. Discher,et al.  Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage — Soluble factors that limit osteogenesis , 2009 .

[18]  L. V. Williams,et al.  Tissue repair and the dynamics of the extracellular matrix. , 2004, The international journal of biochemistry & cell biology.

[19]  C. Werner,et al.  Macroporous starPEG-heparin cryogels. , 2012, Biomacromolecules.

[20]  Philip Kollmannsberger,et al.  The physics of tissue patterning and extracellular matrix organisation: how cells join forces , 2011 .

[21]  M C Davies,et al.  Interactions of 3T3 fibroblasts and endothelial cells with defined pore features. , 2002, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[22]  S Ramtani,et al.  Mechanical modelling of cell/ECM and cell/cell interactions during the contraction of a fibroblast-populated collagen microsphere: theory and model simulation. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[23]  V. Lozinsky Cryogels on the basis of natural and synthetic polymers: preparation, properties and application , 2002 .

[24]  M Navarro,et al.  Biomaterials in orthopaedics , 2008, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[25]  H. M. Byrne,et al.  The interplay between tissue growth and scaffold degradation in engineered tissue constructs , 2012, Journal of Mathematical Biology.

[26]  J. Heath,et al.  A new hypothesis of contact guidance in tissue cells. , 1976, Experimental cell research.

[27]  K. Minakuchi,et al.  Difference in interaction of fibronectin with type I collagen and type IV collagen. , 1997, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[28]  C. Please,et al.  Pore Geometry Regulates Early Stage Human Bone Marrow Cell Tissue Formation and Organisation , 2013, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[29]  J. Schwarzbauer,et al.  Fibronectin fibrillogenesis, a cell-mediated matrix assembly process. , 2005, Matrix biology : journal of the International Society for Matrix Biology.

[30]  Yun Ho Jang,et al.  Mesenchymal stem cells' interaction with skin: Wound‐healing effect on fibroblast cells and skin tissue , 2010, Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society.

[31]  Paolo Dario,et al.  Evaluation of substrata effect on cell adhesion properties using freestanding poly(L-lactic acid) nanosheets. , 2011, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[32]  E. Higginbotham,et al.  Effects of ascorbic acid on levels of fibronectin, laminin and collagen type 1 in bovine trabecular meshwork in organ culture. , 1998, Current eye research.

[33]  Philip Kollmannsberger,et al.  How Linear Tension Converts to Curvature: Geometric Control of Bone Tissue Growth , 2012, PloS one.

[34]  C. S. Chen,et al.  Geometric control of cell life and death. , 1997, Science.

[35]  Carsten Werner,et al.  A star-PEG-heparin hydrogel platform to aid cell replacement therapies for neurodegenerative diseases. , 2009, Biomaterials.

[36]  P. Poulin,et al.  The effect of surface energy, adsorbed RGD peptides and fibronectin on the attachment and spreading of cells on multiwalled carbon nanotube papers , 2011 .

[37]  Larry L Hench,et al.  Third-Generation Biomedical Materials , 2002, Science.

[38]  C. Werner,et al.  Modulating Biofunctional starPEG Heparin Hydrogels by Varying Size and Ratio of the Constituents , 2011 .

[39]  S. Sen,et al.  Matrix Elasticity Directs Stem Cell Lineage Specification , 2006, Cell.

[40]  J. Sottile,et al.  Fibronectin-dependent collagen I deposition modulates the cell response to fibronectin. , 2007, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[41]  J. Werkmeister,et al.  Modeling tissue growth within nonwoven scaffolds pores. , 2011, Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods.

[42]  K. Beningo,et al.  Responses of fibroblasts to anchorage of dorsal extracellular matrix receptors , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[43]  K. Wennerberg,et al.  Polymerization of Type I and III Collagens Is Dependent On Fibronectin and Enhanced By Integrins α11β1and α2β1 * , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[44]  G. Duda,et al.  The impact of substrate stiffness and mechanical loading on fibroblast-induced scaffold remodeling. , 2012, Tissue engineering. Part A.

[45]  Philip Kollmannsberger,et al.  Geometry as a Factor for Tissue Growth: Towards Shape Optimization of Tissue Engineering Scaffolds , 2013, Advanced healthcare materials.

[46]  C. Guérin,et al.  Colocalization Analysis in Fluorescence Micrographs: Verification of a More Accurate Calculation of Pearson's Correlation Coefficient , 2010, Microscopy and Microanalysis.