Leadership and Path Characteristics during Walks Are Linked to Dominance Order and Individual Traits in Dogs

Movement interactions and the underlying social structure in groups have relevance across many social-living species. Collective motion of groups could be based on an “egalitarian” decision system, but in practice it is often influenced by underlying social network structures and by individual characteristics. We investigated whether dominance rank and personality traits are linked to leader and follower roles during joint motion of family dogs. We obtained high-resolution spatio-temporal GPS trajectory data (823,148 data points) from six dogs belonging to the same household and their owner during 14 30–40 min unleashed walks. We identified several features of the dogs' paths (e.g., running speed or distance from the owner) which are characteristic of a given dog. A directional correlation analysis quantifies interactions between pairs of dogs that run loops jointly. We found that dogs play the role of the leader about 50–85% of the time, i.e. the leader and follower roles in a given pair are dynamically interchangable. However, on a longer timescale tendencies to lead differ consistently. The network constructed from these loose leader–follower relations is hierarchical, and the dogs' positions in the network correlates with the age, dominance rank, trainability, controllability, and aggression measures derived from personality questionnaires. We demonstrated the possibility of determining dominance rank and personality traits of an individual based only on its logged movement data. The collective motion of dogs is influenced by underlying social network structures and by characteristics such as personality differences. Our findings could pave the way for automated animal personality and human social interaction measurements.

[1]  A. Jones Development and *validation of a Dog Personality Questionnaire , 2008 .

[2]  Larissa Conradt,et al.  Conflicts of interest and the evolution of decision sharing , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[3]  P. Hemsworth,et al.  A survey of dog ownership in suburban Australia—conditions and behaviour problems , 2003 .

[4]  L. David Mech,et al.  Leadership in wolf, Canis lupus, packs , 2000 .

[5]  J. Archer Testosterone and persistence in mice , 1977, Animal Behaviour.

[6]  Ádám Miklósi,et al.  Author's Personal Copy Behavioural Processes Dog and Owner Demographic Characteristics and Dog Personality Trait Associations , 2022 .

[7]  Jeremy M. Koster,et al.  Heterogeneity of hunting ability and nutritional status among domestic dogs in lowland Nicaragua , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  J. Bradshaw,et al.  Dominance in domestic dogs: Useful construct or bad habit? , 2008 .

[9]  E. Natoli,et al.  Dominance in relation to age, sex, and competitive contexts in a group of free-ranging domestic dogs , 2010 .

[10]  Charlotte K. Hemelrijk,et al.  Leadership in fish shoals , 2000 .

[11]  P. Mertens The Concept of Dominance and the Treatment of Aggression in Multidog Homes: A Comment on van Kerkhove's Commentary , 2004, Journal of applied animal welfare science : JAAWS.

[12]  Marek Špinka,et al.  Graded leadership by dominant animals in a herd of female beef cattle on pasture , 2010, Animal Behaviour.

[13]  R. Johnstone,et al.  Personality counts: the effect of boldness on shoal choice in three-spined sticklebacks , 2009, Animal Behaviour.

[14]  Simona Cafazzo,et al.  Effect of affiliative and agonistic relationships on leadership behaviour in free-ranging dogs , 2010, Animal Behaviour.

[15]  S. B. Datta,et al.  Effects of Group Demography on Dominance Relationships Among Female Primates. I. Mother-Daughter and Sister-Sister Relations , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[16]  B. Giles-Corti,et al.  Dog ownership, health and physical activity: a critical review of the literature. , 2007, Health & place.

[17]  T. Rowell The concept of social dominance. , 1974, Behavioral biology.

[18]  M. Manser,et al.  Variable initiators of group departure in a cooperative breeder: the influence of sex, age, state and foraging success , 2012, Animal Behaviour.

[19]  S. Gosling,et al.  Temperament and personality in dogs (Canis familiaris): A review and evaluation of past research , 2005 .

[20]  A. Czirók,et al.  Collective Motion , 1999, physics/9902023.

[21]  Jessica V. Bryant,et al.  Four-legged friend or foe? Dog walking displaces native birds from natural areas , 2007, Biology Letters.

[22]  N. Rooney,et al.  Ádám Miklósi Dog Behaviour, Evolution, and Cognition , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[23]  Á. Miklósi,et al.  Trainability and boldness traits differ between dog breed clusters based on conventional breed categories and genetic relatedness , 2011 .

[24]  Barbara B. Smuts,et al.  Partner preferences and asymmetries in social play among domestic dog, Canis lupus familiaris, littermates , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[25]  R. Schenkel,et al.  Submission: Its Features and Function in the Wolf and Dog , 1967 .

[26]  Márta Gácsi,et al.  Provided for Non-commercial Research and Educational Use Only. Not for Reproduction, Distribution or Commercial Use. the Dog as a Model for Understanding Human Social Behavior , 2022 .

[27]  D. Macdonald,et al.  Stability of Social Status in Wild Rats: Age and the Role of Settled Dominance , 1995 .

[28]  D. Biro,et al.  Group decisions and individual differences: route fidelity predicts flight leadership in homing pigeons (Columba livia) , 2010, Biology Letters.

[29]  Ádám Miklósi,et al.  Co-operative interactions between blind persons and their dogs , 2001 .

[30]  Peter M. Kappeler,et al.  Evolution of Primate Social Systems , 2002, International Journal of Primatology.

[31]  S. K. Pal,et al.  Inter- and intra-sexual behaviour of free-ranging dogs (Canis familiaris) , 1999 .

[32]  E. Ostrander,et al.  A genetic dissection of breed composition and performance enhancement in the Alaskan sled dog , 2010, BMC Genetics.

[33]  S. K. Pal Mating System of Free-Ranging Dogs (Canis familiaris) , 2011 .

[34]  Jean-Louis Deneubourg,et al.  Differences in Nutrient Requirements Imply a Non-Linear Emergence of Leaders in Animal Groups , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[35]  C. Drews THE CONCEPT AND DEFINITION OF DOMINANCE IN ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR , 1993 .

[36]  A. Flack,et al.  What are leaders made of? The role of individual experience in determining leader–follower relations in homing pigeons , 2012, Animal Behaviour.

[37]  Andrew J. King,et al.  All together now: behavioural synchrony in baboons , 2009, Animal Behaviour.

[38]  James N. M. Smith,et al.  Phenotypic correlates and ecological consequences of dominance in song sparrows , 1985 .

[39]  J. Fischer,et al.  Communication and Cognition in Primate Group Movement , 2011, International Journal of Primatology.

[40]  Dominic D. P. Johnson,et al.  The Origins and Evolution of Leadership , 2009, Current Biology.

[41]  S. K. Pal Parental care in free-ranging dogs, Canis familiaris , 2005 .

[42]  J. Krause,et al.  Personality in the context of social networks , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[43]  S. Pratt,et al.  Quorum responses and consensus decision making , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[44]  J. C. Wright Comment on van Kerkhove's "Wolf-Pack Theory" , 2004 .

[45]  Andrea Manica,et al.  Evolution of personality differences in leadership , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[46]  Á. Miklósi,et al.  How does dominance rank status affect individual and social learning performance in the dog (Canis familiaris)? , 2007, Animal Cognition.

[47]  Andrea Manica,et al.  Experience overrides personality differences in the tendency to follow but not in the tendency to lead , 2013, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[48]  Márta Gácsi,et al.  On the Utilization of Social Animals as a Model for Social Robotics , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[49]  T. Vicsek,et al.  Hierarchical group dynamics in pigeon flocks , 2010, Nature.

[50]  L. Mech,et al.  Leadership behavior in relation to dominance and reproductive status in gray wolves, Canis lupus , 2002 .

[51]  O. Petit,et al.  Shared or unshared consensus decision in macaques? , 2008, Behavioural Processes.

[52]  T. Vicsek,et al.  Context-dependent hierarchies in pigeons , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[53]  Michael Breakspear,et al.  Modeling Magnification and Anisotropy in the Primate Foveal Confluence , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..