Students’ approaches to learning and assessment preferences in a portfolio-based learning environment

This study focused on the relationships between experiences with portfolio assessment, students’ approaches to learning and their assessment preferences by means of a pre- and post-test design in an authentic class setting. The participants were 138 first-year professional bachelor’s degree students in office management. They were assessed by means of portfolio assessment in a course that combined constructivist design principles and lectures. Approaches to learning and assessment preferences were measured by means of the Revised Two-Factor Study Process Questionnaire and the Assessment Preferences Inventory. Results showed that students’ preferences for student participation in examination and for permanent evaluation decreased significantly. Moreover, deep approaches were not enhanced. On the contrary, surface learning increased significantly. Notwithstanding, the surface approach proved to be a significant negative predictor of the portfolio assessment score.

[1]  C. Tang,et al.  From process to outcome: the effect of portfolio assessment on student learning. , 2003, Nurse education today.

[2]  Keithia Wilson *,et al.  Assessing the impact of learning environments on students' approaches to learning: comparing conventional and action learning designs , 2005 .

[3]  Kenneth M. Zeichner,et al.  The teaching portfolio in US teacher education programs: what we know and what we need to know , 2001 .

[4]  Lieven Verschaffel,et al.  Powerful learning environments : unravelling basic components and dimensions , 2003 .

[5]  G. Huon,et al.  Approaches to studying and academic performance in short-essay exams , 2004 .

[6]  R. Debus,et al.  Developing deep learning approaches and personal teaching efficacy within a preservice teacher education context. , 2002, The British journal of educational psychology.

[7]  Noel Entwistle,et al.  Student failure: Disintegrated patterns of study strategies and perceptions of the learning environment , 1991 .

[8]  Mien Segers,et al.  Redesigning a learning and assessment environment: The influence on students' perceptions of assessment demands and their learning strategies , 2006 .

[9]  Menucha Birenbaum,et al.  Assessment and instruction preferences and their relationship with test anxiety and learning strategies , 2007 .

[10]  Jennifer M. Case,et al.  ‘Approaches to learning’ research in higher education: a response to Haggis , 2005 .

[12]  D. Kember.  Interpreting Student Workload and the Factors Which Shape Students' Perceptions of Their Workload. , 2004 .

[13]  David Gijbels,et al.  Students’ assessment preferences and approaches to learning: can formative assessment make a difference? , 2006 .

[14]  Mien Segers,et al.  Influence of Redesigning a Learning Environment on Student Perceptions and Learning Strategies , 2005 .

[15]  D. Kember,et al.  An Implementation of Active Learning and its Effect on the Quality of Student Learning , 2000 .

[16]  D. Boud.  Assessment and the promotion of academic values , 1990 .

[17]  F. Marton,et al.  Approaches to learning , 2003 .

[18]  Noel Entwistle,et al.  Approaches to learning and perceptions of the learning environment , 1991 .

[19]  F. Marton,et al.  The Experience of Learning , 1984 .

[20]  David Kember,et al.  Learning approaches, study time and academic performance , 1995 .

[21]  Gabriele B. Sweidel,et al.  Study Strategy Portfolio: A Project to Enhance Study Skills and Time Management , 1996 .

[22]  Menucha Birenbaum,et al.  Alternatives in Assessment of Achievements, Learning Processes, and Prior Knowledge , 1996 .

[23]  Anna Fyrenius,et al.  Lectures in problem-based learning—Why, when and how? An example of interactive lecturing that stimulates meaningful learning , 2005, Medical teacher.

[24]  M. Birenbaum.  Assessment 2000: Towards a Pluralistic Approach to Assessment , 1996 .

[25]  Judith A. Arter,et al.  Using Portfolios of Student Work in Instruction and Assessment , 2005 .

[26]  M. Birenbaum.  Assessment preferences and their relationship to learning strategies and orientations , 1997 .

[27]  Noel Entwistle,et al.  Motivational Factors in Students' Approaches to Learning , 1988 .

[28]  Sandra P. Horn,et al.  Teacher and Classroom Context Effects on Student Achievement: Implications for Teacher Evaluation , 1997 .

[29]  J. Biggs,et al.  The revised two-factor Study Process Questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F. , 2001, The British journal of educational psychology.

[30]  L. Hedges,et al.  How Large Are Teacher Effects? , 2004 .

[31]  N. Entwistle,et al.  Approaches to learning, evaluations of teaching, and preferences for contrasting academic environments , 1990 .

[32]  J. Biggs.  Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment , 1996 .

[33]  P. Tynjälä.  Perspectives into learning at the workplace , 2008 .

[34]  P. Zeegers,et al.  Approaches to learning in science: a longitudinal study. , 2001, The British journal of educational psychology.

[35]  Menucha Birenbaum,et al.  Toward adaptive assessment — The student's angle , 1994 .

[36]  R. Schmeck,et al.  Learning strategies and learning styles , 1988 .

[37]  K. Scouller.  The influence of assessment method on students' learning approaches: Multiple choice question examination versus assignment essay , 1998 .

[38]  Menucha Birenbaum,et al.  Relationships between learning patterns and attitudes towards two assessment formats , 1998 .

[39]  Sarah Gielen,et al.  On the dynamics of students' approaches to learning: The effects of the teaching/learning environment , 2006 .

[40]  A. Davies,et al.  Assessment for Learning: Reconsidering Portfolios and Research Evidence , 2003 .

[41]  Velda McCune,et al.  Investigating ways of enhancing university teaching-learning environments: Measuring students' approaches to studying and perceptions of teaching , 2003 .

[42]  F. Dochy,et al.  Assessment as a Major Influence on Learning and Instruction. , 1997 .

[43]  Uri Zoller,et al.  Gender differences in examination‐type preferences, test anxiety, and academic achievements in college science education—a case study , 1990 .

[44]  Uri Zoller,et al.  Examination-type preferences of secondary school students and their teachers in the science disciplines , 1997 .

[45]  Mien Segers,et al.  The Era of Assessment Engineering: Changing Perspectives on Teaching and Learning and the Role of New Modes of Assessment , 2003 .

[46]  Mien Segers,et al.  Optimising new modes of assessment : in search of qualities and standards , 2003 .

[47]  N. Entwistle.  Contrasting Perspectives on Learning , 2005 .

[48]  R. Sternberg,et al.  Perspectives on thinking, learning, and cognitive styles , 2001 .

[49]  Erik De Corte,et al.  Marrying theory building and the improvement of school practice: a permanent challenge for instructional psychology , 2000 .

[50]  M. Birenbaum,et al.  Assessment preferences, learning orientations, and learning strategies of pre‐service and in‐service teachers , 2006 .

[51]  J. Biggs,et al.  Teaching For Quality Learning At University , 1999 .

[52]  Ian Dennis,et al.  Approaches to learning and studying in medical students: validation of a revised inventory and its relation to student characteristics and performance , 2004, Medical education.

[53]  Heather Joshi,et al.  Investing in People. , 1982 .

[54]  L. McDowell,et al.  "BUT IS IT FAIR?" : AN EXPLORATORY STUDY OF STUDENT PERCEPTIONS OF THE CONSEQUENTIAL VALIDITY OF ASSESSMENT , 1997 .

[55]  F. Dochy,et al.  The Effects of Hands-On Experience On Students' Preferences for Assessment Methods , 2008 .

[56]  M. Zeidner.  Essay Versus Multiple-Choice Type Classroom Exams: The Student's Perspective. , 1987 .

[57]  K. Trigwell,et al.  RELATING APPROACHES TO STUDY AND QUALITY OF LEARNING OUTCOMES AT THE COURSE LEVEL , 1991 .

[58]  Uri Zoller,et al.  Interaction between Examination Type, Anxiety State, and Academic Achievement in College Science; an Action-Oriented Research. , 1989 .