The purpose of this investigation was to apply the recently developed CAMPI (computer analysis of mammography phantom images) method to a Fischer Mammotest Stereotactic Digital Biopsy machine. Another aim was to further elucidate the nature of the empirically introduced CAMPI measures. Images of an American College of Radiology (ACR) accreditation phantom centered on the largest two speck groups were obtained on this machine under a variety of x-ray conditions. An additional measure, alternative SNR (ASNR) is introduced which is complementary to the SNR measure. Analyses of the Mammotest images revealed that the mAs and kVp dependencies of the CAMPI measures could be understood from basic imaging physics principles. It is shown that: (1) the measures reflect the expected linearity of the digital detector and Poisson photon statistics; (2) under automatic exposure control (AEC) conditions the signal (SIG) measure is proportional to subject contrast; and (3) under AEC conditions the noise (NOI) measure is proportional to the square root of the average absorbed photon energy. Correspondence with basic imaging physics principles shows that the measures are significantly free of artifacts. Precision of the CAMPI measures exceeds that of human observers by orders of magnitude. CAMPI measures are expected to be more relevant to clinical mammography than Fourier metrics as the measurements are done on objects of arbitrary shape and size that were designed by the manufacturer to resemble various detection tasks in mammography. It is concluded that CAMPI can perform objective and highly precise evaluations of phantom image quality in mammography. It could be used as a sophisticated quality control tool, as a replacement for the current ACR/MQSA phantom evaluation program, and to evaluate the rapidly evolving digital mammography technology.
[1]
G T Barnes,et al.
Signal-to-noise ratio considerations in radiographic imaging.
,
1983,
Medical physics.
[2]
M. Tapiovaara.
SNR and noise measurements for medical imaging. II. Application to fluoroscopic X-ray equipment
,
1993
.
[3]
R. F. Wagner,et al.
SNR and noise measurements for medical imaging: I. A practical approach based on statistical decision theory.
,
1993,
Physics in medicine and biology.
[4]
R Fahrig,et al.
A model for optimization of spectral shape in digital mammography.
,
1994,
Medical physics.
[5]
M P Eckert,et al.
Quantitative versus subjective evaluation of mammography accreditation phantom images.
,
1995,
Medical physics.