Evaluation of deregulated airline networks using data envelopment analysis combined with principal component analysis with an application to Western Europe

Abstract US experience shows that deregulation of the airline industry leads to the formation of hub-and-spoke (HS) airline networks. Viewing potential HS networks as decision-making units, we use data envelopment analysis (DEA) to select the most efficient networks configurations from the many that are possible in the deregulated European Union airline market. To overcome the difficulties that DEA encounters when there is an excessive number of inputs or outputs, we employ principal component analysis (PCA) to aggregate certain, clustered data, whilst ensuring very similar results to those achieved under the original DEA model. The DEA–PCA formulation is then illustrated with real-world data gathered from the West European air transportation industry.

[1]  B. Golany,et al.  Alternate methods of treating factor weights in DEA , 1993 .

[2]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[3]  J. Overall,et al.  Applied multivariate analysis , 1983 .

[4]  Tae Hoon Oum,et al.  Winning Airlines: Productivity and Cost Competitiveness of the World’s Major Airlines , 1997 .

[5]  Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al.  Separating Market Efficiency from Profitability and its Implications for Planning , 1995 .

[6]  J. Storbeck,et al.  Non-parametric models for spatial efficiency , 1995 .

[7]  Jesús T. Pastor,et al.  Chapter 3 Translation invariance in data envelopment analysis: A generalization , 1996, Ann. Oper. Res..

[8]  Yaakov Roll,et al.  An application procedure for DEA , 1989 .

[9]  L. Seiford,et al.  Translation invariance in data envelopment analysis , 1990 .

[10]  F. Førsund,et al.  Slack-adjusted efficiency measures and ranking of efficient units , 1996 .

[11]  W. Cook,et al.  A data envelopment model for aggregating preference rankings , 1990 .

[12]  Gang Yu,et al.  A goal programming-discriminant function approach to the estimation of an empirical production function based on DEA results , 1995 .

[13]  Oz Shy,et al.  Airline Deregulation and the Choice of Networks , 1991 .

[14]  Henry Tulkens,et al.  On FDH efficiency analysis: Some methodological issues and applications to retail banking, courts, and urban transit , 1993 .

[15]  Oz Shy,et al.  The Structure of Airline Equilibrium Networks , 1996 .

[16]  P. Andersen,et al.  A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis , 1993 .

[17]  Russell G. Thompson,et al.  Importance for DEA of zeros in data, multipliers, and solutions , 1993 .

[18]  Boaz Golany,et al.  Foundations of data envelopment analysis for Pareto-Koopmans efficient empirical production functions , 1985 .

[19]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[20]  Lawrence M. Seiford,et al.  INFEASIBILITY OF SUPER EFFICIENCY DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS MODELS , 1999 .

[21]  Zilla Sinuany-Stern,et al.  Scaling units via the canonical correlation analysis in the DEA context , 1997, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[22]  David R. Graham,et al.  Deregulating the Airlines , 1985 .

[23]  C. Winston,et al.  The Economic Effects of Airline Deregulation , 1986 .

[24]  James E. Storbeck,et al.  A data envelopment analysis for spatial efficiency , 1990 .

[25]  Clifford Winston,et al.  The Evolution of the Airline Industry , 1994 .