About negative efficiencies in Cross Evaluation BCC input oriented models

It will be shown in this paper that the input oriented DEA BCC model can generate negative efficiencies that are usually hidden in the model. The impact of these negative efficiencies becomes obvious when using input oriented Cross Evaluation models. With the help of an example with one input and one output, the conditions for the possible occurrence of negative efficiencies will be shown. Furthermore, we will show that a small intuitive change in the BCC multipliers model, previously presented in other papers, corrects this situation. We show why this change is used and compared it with an alternative formulation, which avoid negative efficiencies, namely the Non-Decreasing Returns to Scale (NDRS) model. We also show that the formulation studied in this paper is less restrictive than the NDRS model. The study of this variation in the DEA BCC model will be complemented with the formulation of the dual envelope model. This model changes the original frontier. Using the concept of non-observed DMUs, those variations can be graphically analyzed. We have also carried out some algebraic studies concerning benchmarks, multipliers and returns to scale.

[1]  Denise Santos de Figueiredo,et al.  Effectiveness and efficiency hibrid index for retail stores , 2009 .

[2]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis , 1996 .

[3]  Boaz Golany,et al.  Foundations of data envelopment analysis for Pareto-Koopmans efficient empirical production functions , 1985 .

[4]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[5]  H. Paul Williams,et al.  A methodology for cross-evaluation in DEA , 2006 .

[6]  Joseph C. Paradi,et al.  Establishing the "practical frontier" in data envelopment analysis , 2004 .

[7]  Reinaldo Castro Souza,et al.  Artificial DMUs and Contingent Weight Restrictions for the Analysis of Brazilian Retail Banks Efficiency , 2007, OR.

[8]  Wilhelm Rödder,et al.  Advanced X-efficiencies for CCR- and BCC-models - towards Peer-based DEA controlling , 2012, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[9]  When a value judgement using the technique of unobserved DMUs can be changed by weight restrictions , 2004 .

[10]  Robert M. Thrall Chapter 4 The lack of invariance of optimal dual solutions under translation , 1996, Ann. Oper. Res..

[11]  Lidia Angulo Meza,et al.  Choosing weights in optimal solutions for DEA-BCC models by means of a N-dimensional smooth frontier , 2009 .

[12]  W. Cooper,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software , 1999 .

[13]  Majid Soleimani-Damaneh,et al.  A note on simulating weights restrictions in DEA: an improvement of Thanassoulis and Allen's method , 2005, Comput. Oper. Res..

[14]  Rodney H. Green,et al.  Efficiency and Cross-efficiency in DEA: Derivations, Meanings and Uses , 1994 .

[15]  T. Sexton,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis: Critique and Extensions , 1986 .

[16]  Finn R. Førsund,et al.  Calculating scale elasticity in DEA models , 2004, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[17]  Luiz Biondi Neto,et al.  Free Software for Decision Analysis: A Software Package for Data Envelopment Models , 2005, ICEIS.

[18]  Juan Aparicio,et al.  Translation Invariance in Data Envelopment Analysis , 2015 .

[19]  William W. Cooper,et al.  Introduction to Data Envelopment Analysis and Its Uses: With Dea-Solver Software and References , 2005 .

[20]  Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al.  Simulating Weights Restrictions in Data Envelopment Analysis by Means of Unobserved Dmus , 1998 .

[21]  Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al.  Improving envelopment in Data Envelopment Analysis under variable returns to scale , 2012, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[22]  Eliane Gonçalves Gomes,et al.  Olympic ranking based on a zero sum gains DEA model , 2003, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[23]  Luiz Biondi Neto,et al.  ISYDS- Integrated System for Decision Support (SIAD - Sistema Integrado de Apoio a Decisão): a software package for data envelopment analysis model , 2005 .

[24]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[25]  Liang Liang,et al.  DEA game cross-efficiency approach to Olympic rankings , 2009 .

[26]  A. Charnes,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis Theory, Methodology and Applications , 1995 .

[27]  Marcos Pereira Estellita Lins,et al.  CONSTRUCTION OF A SMOOTHED DEA FRONTIER , 2002 .