A Generalized Voter Model on Complex Networks

We study a generalization of the voter model on complex networks, focusing on the scaling of mean exit time. Previous work has defined the voter model in terms of an initially chosen node and a randomly chosen neighbor, which makes it difficult to disentangle the effects of the stochastic process itself relative to the network structure. We introduce a process with two steps, one that selects a pair of interacting nodes and one that determines the direction of interaction as a function of the degrees of the two nodes and a parameter α which sets the likelihood of the higher degree node giving its state to the other node. Traditional voter model behaviors can be recovered within the model, as well as the invasion process. We find that on a complete bipartite network, the voter model is the fastest process. On a random network with power law degree distribution, we observe two regimes. For modest values of α, exit time is dominated by diffusive drift of the system state, but as the high-degree nodes become more influential, the exit time becomes dominated by frustration effects dependent on the exact topology of the network.

[1]  S. Redner,et al.  Voter model on heterogeneous graphs. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[2]  S. Redner,et al.  Finiteness and fluctuations in growing networks , 2002, cond-mat/0207107.

[3]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  The Structure and Function of Complex Networks , 2003, SIAM Rev..

[4]  Sidney Redner,et al.  A guide to first-passage processes , 2001 .

[5]  V. Eguíluz,et al.  Conservation laws for the voter model in complex networks , 2004, cond-mat/0408101.

[6]  G J Baxter,et al.  Fixation and consensus times on a network: a unified approach. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[7]  S. Fortunato,et al.  Statistical physics of social dynamics , 2007, 0710.3256.

[8]  T. Liggett Interacting Particle Systems , 1985 .

[9]  Jean-Loup Guillaume,et al.  Local leaders in random networks. , 2007, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[10]  W. Bruce Croft,et al.  Selection Model of , 2022 .

[11]  Bruce A. Reed,et al.  A Critical Point for Random Graphs with a Given Degree Sequence , 1995, Random Struct. Algorithms.

[12]  Mark Newman,et al.  The structure and function of networks , 2002 .

[13]  F. Vazquez,et al.  Analytical solution of the voter model on uncorrelated networks , 2008, 0803.1686.

[14]  Krzysztof Suchecki,et al.  Voter model dynamics in complex networks: Role of dimensionality, disorder, and degree distribution. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[15]  S. Hubbell,et al.  The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography at age ten. , 2011, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[16]  Claudio Castellano Effect of network topology on the ordering dynamics of voter models , 2005 .

[17]  Alessandro Vespignani,et al.  Epidemic spreading in scale-free networks. , 2000, Physical review letters.

[18]  Krapivsky Kinetics of monomer-monomer surface catalytic reactions. , 1992, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[19]  D. Parisi,et al.  Comparison of voter and Glauber ordering dynamics on networks. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[20]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[21]  S. Redner A guide to first-passage processes , 2001 .