Factors of electric vehicle adoption: A comparison of conventional and electric car users based on an extended theory of planned behavior

ABSTRACT Increasing the share of battery electric vehicles (BEV) in the total car fleet is regarded as a promising way to reduce local car emissions. Based on online surveys in Denmark and Sweden, this study compares BEV users' (n = 673) and conventional vehicle (CV) users' (n = 1794) socio-demographic profiles, attitudinal profiles, and mobility patterns. In line with previous research, BEV users are typically male, highly educated, have high incomes, and often more than one car in their household. Additionally, BEV users perceive less functional barriers toward BEV use and have more positive attitudes and norms than CV users. The different profiles of these user groups suggest a separate analysis of potential factors of BEV adoption in both groups. In regression analyses, CV and BEV users' intention to use/purchase a BEV is modeled based on factors of the Theory of Planned Behavior extended by personal norm, perceived mobility necessities, and BEV experience. For CV users, symbolic attitudes related to BEVs are the most important factor of intention, while perceived functional barriers in terms of driving range are most relevant for BEV users' intention. How BEV users cope with trips of longer distance seems of particular relevance. In multiple car households, we found the percentage of actual BEV usage related to the type of other cars in the household, perceived functional barriers of BEVs as well as (successful) behavioral adaption to longer trips by BEVs. Based on the results, we discuss ways to increase BEV adoption for current users and non-users.

[1]  Rachel Ablow,et al.  Keywords , 2018, Victorian Literature and Culture.

[2]  Anders Fjendbo Jensen,et al.  The use of electric vehicles: A case study on adding an electric car to a household , 2017 .

[3]  Yusak O. Susilo,et al.  Electric vehicle users and their travel patterns in Greater Stockholm , 2017 .

[4]  Franziska Schmalfuß,et al.  Direct experience with battery electric vehicles (BEVs) matters when evaluating vehicle attributes, attitude and purchase intention , 2017 .

[5]  J. Nelson,et al.  Consumer structure in the emerging market for electric vehicles: Identifying market segments using cluster analysis , 2017 .

[6]  J. Stannard,et al.  How experience of use influences mass-market drivers’ willingness to consider a battery electric vehicle: A randomised controlled trial , 2016 .

[7]  Elisabetta Cherchi,et al.  Accounting for the Theory of Planned Behaviour in departure time choice , 2016 .

[8]  Kristin Ystmark Bjerkan,et al.  Incentives for promoting Battery Electric Vehicle (BEV) adoption in Norway , 2016 .

[9]  Elodie Labeye,et al.  The Electric Vehicle: A New Driving Experience Involving Specific Skills and Rules , 2016 .

[10]  J. Denollet,et al.  Theory of Planned Behavior , 2015 .

[11]  P. D. Pelsmacker,et al.  An Extended Decomposed Theory of Planned Behaviour to Predict the Usage Intention of the Electric Car: A Multi-Group Comparison , 2015 .

[12]  Roland W. Scholz,et al.  Understanding Car-Buying Behavior: Psychological Determinants of Energy Efficiency and Practical Implications , 2015 .

[13]  Stephen Greaves,et al.  An empirical assessment of the feasibility of battery electric vehicles for day-to-day driving , 2014 .

[14]  E. Dütschke,et al.  How do Consumers Perceive Electric Vehicles? A Comparison of German Consumer Groups , 2014 .

[15]  Elisabetta Cherchi,et al.  A long panel survey to elicit variation in preferences and attitudes in the choice of electric vehicles , 2014 .

[16]  Elisabetta Cherchi,et al.  On the stability of preferences and attitudes before and after experiencing an electric vehicle , 2013 .

[17]  Thomas Franke,et al.  What drives range preferences in electric vehicle users , 2013 .

[18]  Randi Hjorthol,et al.  Attitudes, ownership and use of Electric Vehicles – a review of literature , 2013 .

[19]  Jillian Anable,et al.  The role of instrumental, hedonic and symbolic attributes in the intention to adopt electric vehicles , 2013 .

[20]  Catarina Rolim,et al.  Impacts of Electric Vehicle Adoption on Driver Behavior and Environmental Performance , 2012 .

[21]  Suzanna Long,et al.  Barriers to widespread adoption of electric vehicles: An analysis of consumer attitudes and perceptions , 2012 .

[22]  N. Roese,et al.  Hindsight Bias , 2012 .

[23]  Patrick De Pelsmacker,et al.  Emotions as determinants of electric car usage intention , 2012 .

[24]  Randall Guensler,et al.  Electric vehicles: How much range is required for a day’s driving? , 2011 .

[25]  Stephen Skippon,et al.  Responses to battery electric vehicles: UK consumer attitudes and attributions of symbolic meaning following direct experience to reduce psychological distance , 2011 .

[26]  M. Pierre,et al.  Driving an electric vehicle. A sociological analysis on pioneer users , 2011 .

[27]  Gabriela Beirão,et al.  Understanding attitudes towards public transport and private car: A qualitative study , 2007 .

[28]  Lee Chapman,et al.  Transport and climate change: a review , 2007 .

[29]  S. Haustein,et al.  Reduced use of environmentally friendly modes of transportation caused by perceived mobility necessities: An extension of the theory of planned behavior. , 2007 .

[30]  M. Brauer.  Health Effects of Transport-Related Air Pollution , 2006 .

[31]  J. Anable,et al.  All Work and No Play? The role of instrumental and affective factors in work and leisure journeys by different travel modes , 2005 .

[32]  Linda Steg,et al.  Car use: lust and must. Instrumental, symbolic and affective motives for car use , 2005 .

[33]  J. Garvill,et al.  Effects of values, problem awareness, and personal norm on willingness to reduce personal car use , 2003 .

[34]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Choice of Travel Mode in the Theory of Planned Behavior: The Roles of Past Behavior, Habit, and Reasoned Action , 2003 .

[35]  T. Lajunen,et al.  Can we trust self-reports of driving? Effects of impression management on driver behaviour questionnaire responses , 2003 .

[36]  H. Staats,et al.  Explaining Proenvironmental Intention and Behavior by Personal Norms and the Theory of Planned Behavior1 , 1999 .

[37]  C. Klöckner,et al.  Comparison of socio-psychological characteristics of conventional and battery electric car buyers , 2016 .

[38]  Shanyong Wang,et al.  Predicting consumers’ intention to adopt hybrid electric vehicles: using an extended version of the theory of planned behavior model , 2016 .

[39]  Johan Jansson,et al.  Advances in consumer electric vehicle adoption research: A review and research agenda , 2015 .

[40]  Charles Abraham,et al.  Mainstream consumers driving plug-in battery-electric and plug-in hybrid electric cars: A qualitative analysis of responses and evaluations , 2012 .

[41]  Thomas Franke,et al.  Enhancing sustainability of electric vehicles: A field study approach to understanding user acceptance and behavior , 2011 .

[42]  Karel Brookhuis,et al.  Abstracts of the 27th International Congress of Applied Psychology , 2010 .

[43]  M. Conner,et al.  THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOUR , 2008 .

[44]  S. Potter,et al.  The adoption of cleaner vehicles in the UK: exploring the consumer attitude–action gap , 2007 .

[45]  R. Gifford,et al.  Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior : Predicting the Use of Public Transportation ' , 2002 .

[46]  I. Ajzen.  Constructing a TpB Questionnaire: Conceptual and Methodological Considerations , 2002 .

[47]  L. Steg.  CAR USE: LUST AND MUST , 2001 .

[48]  On the Stability of , 1994 .

[49]  S. Schwartz,et al.  A Normative Decision Making Model of Altruism , 1981 .

[50]  S. Schwartz.  Normative Influences on Altruism , 1977 .