Examining the Effectiveness of Discriminant Function Analysis and Cluster Analysis in Species Identification of Male Field Crickets Based on Their Calling Songs

Traditional taxonomy based on morphology has often failed in accurate species identification owing to the occurrence of cryptic species, which are reproductively isolated but morphologically identical. Molecular data have thus been used to complement morphology in species identification. The sexual advertisement calls in several groups of acoustically communicating animals are species-specific and can thus complement molecular data as non-invasive tools for identification. Several statistical tools and automated identifier algorithms have been used to investigate the efficiency of acoustic signals in species identification. Despite a plethora of such methods, there is a general lack of knowledge regarding the appropriate usage of these methods in specific taxa. In this study, we investigated the performance of two commonly used statistical methods, discriminant function analysis (DFA) and cluster analysis, in identification and classification based on acoustic signals of field cricket species belonging to the subfamily Gryllinae. Using a comparative approach we evaluated the optimal number of species and calling song characteristics for both the methods that lead to most accurate classification and identification. The accuracy of classification using DFA was high and was not affected by the number of taxa used. However, a constraint in using discriminant function analysis is the need for a priori classification of songs. Accuracy of classification using cluster analysis, which does not require a priori knowledge, was maximum for 6–7 taxa and decreased significantly when more than ten taxa were analysed together. We also investigated the efficacy of two novel derived acoustic features in improving the accuracy of identification. Our results show that DFA is a reliable statistical tool for species identification using acoustic signals. Our results also show that cluster analysis of acoustic signals in crickets works effectively for species classification and identification.

[1]  H. Godfray.  Challenges for taxonomy , 2002, Nature.

[2]  Susan C. Loeb,et al.  Effects of Orientation and Weatherproofing on the Detection of Bat Echolocation Calls , 2010 .

[3]  David Spurgeon,et al.  Spreading the word , 1977, Nature.

[4]  Charles E Taylor,et al.  Automated species recognition of antbirds in a Mexican rainforest using hidden Markov models. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  Gareth Jones,et al.  Identification of twenty‐two bat species (Mammalia: Chiroptera) from Italy by analysis of time‐expanded recordings of echolocation calls , 2002 .

[6]  D. Fresneau,et al.  Stridulations Reveal Cryptic Speciation in Neotropical Sympatric Ants , 2010, PloS one.

[7]  A. Elepfandt,et al.  Bioacoustic analysis of frog calls from northeast India , 1993, Journal of Biosciences.

[8]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[9]  S. Georgakarakos,et al.  Artificial neural networks as a tool for species identification of fish schools , 1996 .

[10]  Rodney D. Hale,et al.  Acoustic species identification in the Northwest Atlantic using digital image processing , 2000 .

[11]  S. Reichle,et al.  Acoustic signals, species diagnosis, and species concepts: the case of a new cryptic species of Leptodactylus (Amphibia, Anura, Leptodactylidae) from the Chapare region, Bolivia , 2008 .

[12]  A. Rand,et al.  Acoustic, auditory, and morphological divergence in three species of neotropical frog , 1993, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[13]  Richard C Lewontin,et al.  On the Measurement of Relative Variability , 1966 .

[14]  Michael J. Crawley,et al.  The R book , 2022 .

[15]  Jay Barlow,et al.  ACOUSTIC IDENTIFICATION OF NINE DELPHINID SPECIES IN THE EASTERN TROPICAL PACIFIC OCEAN , 2000 .

[16]  T. S. Sofianidou,et al.  Bioacoustic and morphometric studies in water frogs (genus Rana) of Lake Ioannina in Greece, and description of a new species (Anura, Amphibia) , 1984 .

[17]  S. Goodman,et al.  Identification of cryptic species of Miniopterus bats (Chiroptera: Miniopteridae) from Madagascar and the Comoros using bioacoustics overlaid on molecular genetic and morphological characters , 2011 .

[18]  P. Hebert,et al.  Identification of Birds through DNA Barcodes , 2004, PLoS biology.

[19]  W. Heyer.  Variation, systematics, and zoogeography of Eleutherodactylus guentheri and closely related species (Amphibia: Anura: Leptodactylidae) , 1984 .

[20]  J. Simmonds,et al.  Species identification using wideband backscatter with neural network and discriminant analysis , 1996 .

[21]  J A Kogan,et al.  Automated recognition of bird song elements from continuous recordings using dynamic time warping and hidden Markov models: a comparative study. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  C. W. Morris,et al.  Neural network analysis of flow cytometric data for 40 marine phytoplankton species. , 1994, Cytometry.

[23]  M. Barangé,et al.  Species identification of pelagic fish schools on the South African continental shelf using acoustic descriptors and ancillary information , 2001 .

[24]  Héctor Corrada Bravo,et al.  Automated classification of bird and amphibian calls using machine learning: A comparison of methods , 2009, Ecol. Informatics.

[25]  Geir Odd Johansen,et al.  Acoustic species identification of schooling fish , 2009 .

[26]  David A Hill,et al.  Acoustic Identification of Eight Species of Bat (Mammalia: Chiroptera) Inhabiting Forests of Southern Hokkaido, Japan: Potential for Conservation Monitoring , 2004, Zoological science.

[27]  Alain Hillion,et al.  Narrowband acoustic identification of monospecific fish shoals , 1996 .

[28]  Rohini Balakrishnan,et al.  The utility of song and morphological characters in delineating species boundaries among sympatric tree crickets of the genus Oecanthus (Orthoptera: Gryllidae: Oecanthinae): a numerical taxonomic approach , 2005 .

[29]  W. F. Blair.  Isolating Mechanisms and Interspecies Interactions in Anuran Amphibians , 1964, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[30]  T Scott Brandes,et al.  Using image processing to detect and classify narrow-band cricket and frog calls. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[31]  P. Wood,et al.  The blind leading the blind: cryptic subterranean species and DNA taxonomy , 2003 .

[32]  Keith C. Norris,et al.  A test of a pattern recognition system for identification of spiders , 1999 .

[33]  S. Parsons,et al.  Acoustic identification of twelve species of echolocating bat by discriminant function analysis and artificial neural networks. , 2000, The Journal of experimental biology.

[34]  G Gottlieb,et al.  On the acoustic basis of species identification in wood ducklings (Aix sponsa). , 1975, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[35]  Seppo Ilmari Fagerlund,et al.  Bird Species Recognition Using Support Vector Machines , 2007, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[36]  D. Briggs,et al.  An Evolutionary Perspective , 2004, J. Decis. Syst..

[37]  John K. Horne,et al.  Acoustic approaches to remote species identification: a review , 2000 .

[38]  Michael R W Dawson,et al.  Artificial neural network discrimination of black-capped chickadee (Poecile atricapillus) call notes. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[39]  Manell E. Zakharia,et al.  Wideband sounder for fish species identification at sea , 1996 .

[40]  J. T. Collins,et al.  Phylogeny-based delimitation of species boundaries and contact zones in the trilling chorus frogs (Pseudacris). , 2007, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[41]  M. J. Fouquette.  Speciation in Chorus Frogs. I. Reproductive Character Displacement in the Pseudacris Nigrita Complex , 1975 .

[42]  K. Shaw.  A nested analysis of song groups and species boundaries in the Hawaiian cricket genus Laupala. , 1999, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[43]  S. Reichle,et al.  Acoustic signals, species diagnosis, and species concepts: the case of a new cryptic species of Leptodactylus (Amphibia, Anura, Leptodactylidae) from the Chapare region, Bolivia: ACOUSTIC SIGNALS DIAGNOSE NEW SPECIES , 2008 .

[44]  Gilbert Gottleib.  On the acoustic basis of species identification in wood ducklings (Aix sponsa). , 1974 .

[45]  T. J. Walker,et al.  FACTORS RESPONSIBLE FOR INTRASPECIFIC VARIATION IN THE CALLING SONGS OF CRICKETS , 1962 .

[46]  H. W. Balfoort,et al.  Automatic identification of algae: neural network analysis of flow cytometric data , 1992 .

[47]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  Taxonomy of taxonomists , 1992, Nature.

[48]  Malcolm J Scoble,et al.  Unitary or unified taxonomy? , 2004, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[49]  D. Wake,et al.  Concordant molecular and phenotypic data delineate new taxonomy and conservation priorities for the endangered mountain yellow‐legged frog , 2007 .

[50]  W. F. Blair,et al.  Character Displacement in Frogs , 1974 .

[51]  N. Baeshen,et al.  Biological Identifications Through DNA Barcodes , 2012 .

[52]  R. D. Alexander,et al.  The Australian crickets (Orthoptera: Gryllidae) , 1983 .

[53]  J. Rydell,et al.  Acoustic identification of insectivorous bats (order Chiroptera) of Yucatan, Mexico , 2002 .

[54]  R. Balakrishnan,et al.  Testing concordance in species boundaries using acoustic, morphological, and molecular data in the field cricket genus Itaropsis (Orthoptera: Grylloidea, Gryllidae: Gryllinae) , 2012 .

[55]  W. Bailey.  Acoustic Behaviour of Insects: An Evolutionary Perspective , 1990 .

[56]  David Chesmore,et al.  Automated bioacoustic identification of species. , 2004, Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias.

[57]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  Driving miss daisy: the performance of an automated insect identification system. , 2000 .

[58]  I. Martins,et al.  Bioacoustic analysis of advertisement call in Hyla nana and Hyla sanborni (Anura, Hylidae) in Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil. , 2003, Brazilian journal of biology = Revista brasleira de biologia.