Routines, genes and program-based behavior

It is argued that the ‘routines as genes’ and the ‘routines as skills’ analogies are misleading in several respects. Neither genes, nor skills, nor routines program behavior, if this is taken to involve, first, that they do so in a way that excludes conscious, deliberate choice and, second, that they determine behavior. On a proper understanding of ‘gene’, ‘skill’ and ‘routine’, conscious, deliberate choice is not ruled out when genes, skills or routines are operating. Once we shift from analogy to ontology, genes and skills appear as basic constituents of routines. Routines cannot exist unless specific genes and skills are in place in the individuals involved in the operation of the routines. Both genes and skills can be said to act unconsciously as ‘If ..., then ...’ programs. Even complete knowledge of genes and skills of the individuals involved would fall far short of predicting individual and firm behavior, however. What would still be missing, it is argued, is knowledge about organization, the specific ways in which genes, skills and individuals are connected with one another, and knowledge of context-dependence, what environmental stimuli activate specific chains of genes, skills and individuals.

[1]  J. Clapp,et al.  Development as freedom , 1999 .

[2]  Oliver E. Williamson,et al.  Economic Evolution: An Enquiry into the Foundations of New Institutional Economics. , 1996 .

[3]  U. Witt.  Evolution in markets and institutions , 1993 .

[4]  R. Nelson.  Evolutionary Theories of Cultural Change: An Empirical Perspective , 2004 .

[5]  Patrice D. Tremoulet,et al.  Rethinking Rationality: From Bleak Implications to Darwinian Modules , 1999 .

[6]  D. Sperber,et al.  Explaining Culture: A Naturalistic Approach , 1998 .

[7]  R. Nelson.  Recent Evolutionary Theorizing about Economic Change , 2005, Technology, Institutions, and Economic Growth.

[8]  J. Laurent,et al.  Darwinism and Evolutionary Economics , 2001 .

[9]  S. Stich,et al.  Ending the Rationality Wars: How to Make Disputes About Human Rationality Disappear , 2002 .

[10]  Roger E. Backhouse,et al.  Equilibrium and evolution : an exploration of connecting principles in economics , 1994 .

[11]  P. Silverman.  Rethinking genetic determinism: with only 30,000 genes, what is it that makes humans human? , 2004 .

[12]  W. H. Kane.  On Cause and Effect in Biology. , 1962, Science.

[13]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[14]  Eric R. Kandel,et al.  A Parallel Between Radical Reductionism in Science and in Art , 2003, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[15]  R. Gray,et al.  Cycles of Contingency: Developmental Systems and Evolution , 2001 .

[16]  Michael X Cohen,et al.  Organizational Routines Are Stored as Procedural Memory: Evidence from a Laboratory Study , 1994 .

[17]  Elliott Sober,et al.  The Nature of Selection , 1984 .

[18]  B. Eckardt.  What Is Cognitive Science , 1992 .

[19]  Jack Vromen.  The Human Agent in Evolutionary Economics , 2001 .

[20]  M. Feldman,et al.  Niche construction, biological evolution, and cultural change , 2000, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[21]  E. Mayr.  Cause and Effect in Biology: Kinds of causes, predictability, and teleology are viewed by a practicing biologist , 1961 .

[22]  G. Marcus.  The Birth of the Mind: How a Tiny Number of Genes Creates The Complexities of Human Thought , 2004 .

[23]  U. Witt.  Evolutionary economics: Some principles , 1993 .

[24]  J. Vromen.  Conjectural revisionary economic ontology: Outline of an ambitious research agenda for evolutionary economics , 2004 .

[25]  J. Foster.  The analytical foundations of evolutionary economics: From biological analogy to economic self-organization , 1997 .

[26]  P. Silverman.  Rethinking genetic determinism , 2004 .

[27]  U. Witt.  On the proper interpretation of 'evolution' in economics and its implications for production theory , 2004 .

[28]  B. Pentland,et al.  Organizational Routines as Grammars of Action , 1994 .

[29]  G. Hodgson,et al.  The firm as an interactor: firms as vehicles for habits and routines , 2004 .

[30]  Christopher R. Hitchcock.  Contemporary debates in philosophy of science , 2004 .

[31]  B. Loasby.  Knowledge, institutions, and evolution in economics , 1999 .

[32]  W. Güth,et al.  From teleology to evolution , 2003 .

[33]  E. Kandel.  The Molecular Biology of Memory Storage: A Dialogue Between Genes and Synapses , 2001, Science.

[34]  Geoffrey M. Hodgson,et al.  Economics and Evolution: Bringing Life Back into Economics , 1993 .

[35]  V. Vanberg,et al.  The rationality postulate in economics: its ambiguity, its deficiency and its evolutionary alternative , 2004 .

[36]  Renée Elio.  Common Sense, Reasoning, and Rationality , 2002 .

[37]  David Marr,et al.  VISION A Computational Investigation into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information , 2009 .

[38]  Markus C. Becker,et al.  The concept of routines twenty years after Nelson and Winter (1982) A review of the literature , 2003 .

[39]  G. Hodgson,et al.  Why We Need a Generalized Darwinism, And Why Generalized Darwinism is Not Enough , 2006 .

[40]  Michael X Cohen,et al.  Routines and Other Recurring Action Patterns of Organizations: Contemporary Research Issues , 1996 .

[41]  G. Hodgson.  The Darwinian Destiny of An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change , 2003 .

[42]  J M Smith,et al.  Evolution and the theory of games , 1976 .

[43]  R. Samuels.  Evolutionary Psychology and the Massive Modularity Hypothesis , 1998, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[44]  From Teleology to Evolution 1 Bridging the gap between rationality and adaptation in social explanation , 2003 .

[45]  Viktor Vanberg,et al.  Rational Choice vs. Program-based Behavior , 2002 .

[46]  E. Hutchins.  Cognition in the wild , 1995 .

[47]  Ulrich Witt,et al.  The Evolving Economy: Essays on the Evolutionary Approach to Economics , 2003 .