How a Product's Design Hierarchy Shapes the Evolution of Technological Knowledge – Evidence from Patent-Citation Networks in Wind Power

We analyze how a product's design hierarchy shapes the focus of inventive activity and the expansion of the underlying body of knowledge, building on the complex-system perspective on technological evolution. This perspective suggests that the design hierarchy of a product can have an ordering effect on the evolution of commercialized artifacts, in particular when product design decisions on high levels of the design hierarchy set the agenda for subsequent variation and experimentation on lower levels. We extend this literature by analyzing the design hierarchy's effect on the evolution of the industry's knowledge base, using the case of wind turbine technology over the period 1973–2009. We assess the technological focus of patents along the core trajectory of knowledge generation, identified through a patent-citation network analysis, and link it to a classification of technological problems into different levels in the design hierarchy. Our analysis suggests that the evolution of an industry's knowledge base along a technological trajectory is not a unidirectional process of gradual refinement: the focus of knowledge generation shifts over time between different sub-systems in a highly sequential pattern, whose order is strongly influenced by the design hierarchy. Each of these shifts initiates the integration of new domains of industry-external knowledge into the knowledge base, thus opening windows of competitive opportunity for potential entrants with strong knowledge positions in the new focus of inventive activity. We discuss implications for the understanding of the competitive advantage of specific knowledge positions of firms and nations and technology policy for emerging technologies.

[1]  A. Salter,et al.  Exploring the capital goods economy: complex product systems in the UK , 2004 .

[2]  P. Gipe Wind Energy Comes of Age , 1995 .

[3]  D. Landes The Unbound Prometheus: Technological Change and Industrial Development in Western Europe from 1750 to the Present , 1969 .

[4]  Arianna Martinelli,et al.  An emerging paradigm or just another trajectory? Understanding the nature of technological changes using engineering heuristics in the telecommunications switching industry , 2012 .

[5]  Donald T. Campbell,et al.  Levels of Organization, Downward Causation, and the Selection-Theory Approach to Evolutionary Epistemology , 2013 .

[6]  Walter G. Vincenti,et al.  What Engineers Know and How They Know It: Analytical Studies from Aeronautical History. , 1992 .

[7]  Pier Paolo Saviotti,et al.  Systems theory and technological change , 1986 .

[8]  Ozgur Dedehayir,et al.  Determining reverse salient types and evolutionary dynamics of technology systems with performance disparities , 2011, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[9]  Nathan,et al.  The influence of market demand upon innovation: A critical review of some recent empirical studies , 1993 .

[10]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  The emergence of a growth industry: a comparative analysis of the German, Dutch and Swedish wind turbine industries , 2003 .

[11]  Bart Verspagen,et al.  Mapping Technological Trajectories as Patent citation Networks: a Study on the History of Fuel Cell Research , 2007, Adv. Complex Syst..

[12]  A. Garrad The lessons learned from the development of the wind energy industry that might be applied to marine industry renewables , 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[13]  Koen Frenken,et al.  Toward a Systematic Framework for Research on Dominant Designs, Technological Innovations, and Industrial Change , 2005 .

[14]  James M. Utterback,et al.  A dynamic model of process and product innovation , 1975 .

[15]  M. Tushman,et al.  On the Organizational Determinants of Technological Change: Towards a Sociology of Technological Evolution , 1992 .

[16]  Koen Frenken,et al.  Variety and niche creation in aircraft, helicopters, motorcycles and microcomputers , 1999 .

[17]  Andrew Davies,et al.  The Business of Projects: Managing Innovation in Complex Products and Systems , 2005 .

[18]  HERBERT A. SIMON,et al.  The Architecture of Complexity , 1991 .

[19]  G. Nemet Demand-pull, technology-push, and government-led incentives for non-incremental technical change , 2009 .

[20]  Walter Guido Vincenti,et al.  What Engineers Know and How They Know It: Analytical Studies from Aeronautical History by Walter G. Vincenti , 1992, Technology and Culture.

[21]  John Metcalfe,et al.  Mapping evolutionary trajectories: Applications to the growth and transformation of medical knowledge , 2007 .

[22]  誠 飯田 WWEA(World Wind Energy Association)情報紹介 , 2012 .

[23]  Anca Daniela Hansen Generators and Power Electronics for Wind Turbines , 2005 .

[24]  Alan MacCormack,et al.  Hidden Structure: Using Network Methods to Map Product Architecture , 2015 .

[25]  Vladimir Batagelj,et al.  Pajek - Analysis and Visualization of Large Networks , 2001, Graph Drawing Software.

[26]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Dominant Designs: A Cyclical Model of Technological Change , 1990 .

[27]  K. Pavitt,et al.  Knowledge Specialization, Organizational Coupling, and the Boundaries of the Firm: Why Do Firms Know More than They Make? , 2001 .

[28]  Önder Nomaler,et al.  Measuring knowledge persistence: a genetic approach to patent citation networks , 2014 .

[29]  Johann Peter Murmann,et al.  Dominant Designs, Technology Cycles, and Organization Outcomes. , 1998 .

[30]  Jaegul Lee,et al.  The era of incremental change in the technology innovation life cycle: An analysis of the automotive emission control industry , 2013 .

[31]  T. P. Hughes,et al.  Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society, 1880-1930 , 1984 .

[32]  R. Garud,et al.  Bricolage versus breakthrough: distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship , 2003 .

[33]  Thorsten Teichert,et al.  Inventive progress measured by multi-stage patent citation analysis , 2005 .

[34]  L. Anadón,et al.  The role of the complementary sector and its relationship with network formation and government policies in emerging sectors: : The case of solar photovoltaics between 2001 and 2009 , 2014 .

[35]  K. Lancaster,et al.  Variety, equity, and efficiency , 1979 .

[36]  Atul Nerkar,et al.  On the Complexity of Technological Evolution: Exploring Coevolution within and across Hierarchical Levels in Optical Disc Technology , 1999 .

[37]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[38]  Fernando Jiménez-Sáez,et al.  Mapping the importance of the real world: The validity of connectivity analysis of patent citations networks , 2011 .

[39]  S. Winter,et al.  In search of useful theory of innovation , 1993 .

[40]  Roberto Fontana,et al.  ‘Chariots of fire’: the evolution of tank technology, 1915–1945 , 2009 .

[41]  T. P. Hughes,et al.  Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society , 1984 .

[42]  Maïder Saint Jean,et al.  Knowledge dynamics and sources of eco-innovation: Mapping the Green Chemistry community , 2014 .

[43]  Johann Peter Murmann,et al.  Dominant Designs, Technological Cycles and Organizational Outcomes , 2002 .

[44]  V. Hoffmann,et al.  The two faces of market support—How deployment policies affect technological exploration and exploitation in the solar photovoltaic industry , 2013 .

[45]  P. Menanteau Learning from Variety and Competition Between Technological Options for Generating Photovoltaic Electricity , 2000 .

[46]  S. Wheelwright,et al.  The interaction of design hierarchies and market concepts in technological evolution * , 2003 .

[47]  Edward W. Constant,et al.  The Origins of the Turbojet Revolution , 1982 .

[48]  Daniel A. Levinthal The Slow Pace of Rapid Technological Change: Gradualism and Punctuation in Technological Change , 1998 .

[49]  Y. Hayami,et al.  Professor Rosenberg and the Direction of Technological Change: A Comment , 1973, Economic Development and Cultural Change.

[50]  A. Trickett,et al.  The Evolution of Helicopter Technology, 1940–1986 , 1992 .

[51]  Morris Teubal,et al.  On User Needs and Need Determination: Aspects of the Theory of Technological Innovation , 1979 .

[52]  H. V. Lente,et al.  Dominance in the prototyping phase - The case of hydrogen passenger cars , 2012 .

[53]  Devendra Sahal,et al.  Technological guideposts and innovation avenues , 1993 .

[54]  Jeffery Funk,et al.  Components, systems and discontinuities: The case of magnetic recording and playback equipment , 2009 .

[55]  Norman P. Hummon,et al.  Connectivity in a citation network: The development of DNA theory☆ , 1989 .

[56]  Marianna Epicoco,et al.  Knowledge patterns and sources of leadership: mapping the semiconductor miniaturization trajectory , 2013 .

[57]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Inside the black box , 1983 .

[58]  Erich Hau,et al.  Wind Turbines: Fundamentals, Technologies, Application, Economics , 1999 .

[59]  Alan MacCormack,et al.  Hidden Structure: Using Network Methods to Map System Architecture , 2014 .

[60]  Sandro Mendonca,et al.  The evolution of new combinations : drivers of British maritime engineering competitiveness during the nineteenth century , 2012 .

[61]  N. Rosenberg Technological Change in the Machine Tool Industry, 1840–1910 , 1963, The Journal of Economic History.

[62]  N. Rosenberg The Direction of Technological Change: Inducement Mechanisms and Focusing Devices , 1969, Economic Development and Cultural Change.

[63]  G. Dosi,et al.  Technology and enterprise in a historical perspective , 1992 .

[64]  S. Fixson,et al.  The Power of Integrality: Linkages between Product Architecture, Innovation, and Industry Structure , 2007 .

[65]  K. Frenken,et al.  The Early Development of the Steam Engine: An Evolutionary Interpretation using Complexity Theory , 2004 .

[66]  Roberto Fontana,et al.  Mapping technological trajectories as patent citation networks. An application to data communication standards , 2009 .

[67]  Sendil K. Ethiraj Allocation of Inventive Effort in Complex Product Systems , 2007 .

[68]  Björn A. Sandén,et al.  Near-term technology policies for long-term climate targets—economy wide versus technology specific approaches , 2005 .

[69]  Chris Hendry,et al.  Changing the view of wind power development: More than “bricolage” , 2011 .

[70]  Rna Rudi Bekkers,et al.  Knowledge positions in high-tech markets: Trajectories, standards, strategies and true innovators , 2012 .

[71]  K. Clark,et al.  Innovation: Mapping the winds of creative destruction☆ , 1993 .

[72]  Kristian Hvidtfelt Nielsen,et al.  Technological Trajectories in the Making: Two Case Studies from the Contemporary History of Wind Power , 2010 .

[73]  K. Pavitt Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change : Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory : Research Policy , 1984 .

[74]  K. Frenken Innovation, Evolution and Complexity Theory , 2006 .

[75]  Edward W. Constant,et al.  A Model for Technological Change Applied to the Turbojet Revolution , 1973 .

[76]  W. Abernathy Innovation : Mapping the winds of creative destruction * , 2003 .

[77]  John H. Barnhill,et al.  THE UNBOUND PROMETHEUS: Technological Change and Industrial Development in Western Europe from 1750 to the Present , 2004 .

[78]  P. Saviotti Technological evolution, variety, and the economy , 1996 .

[79]  César A. Hidalgo,et al.  The Product Space Conditions the Development of Nations , 2007, Science.