Optimization theory fails to predict performance of pigeons in a two-response situation.

Optimization theory states that organisms behave in a way that maximizes reinforcement or "value." In a two-response situation, pigeons' response proportions approximately equaled reinforcement proportions, even when this behavior pattern substantially decreased the rate of reinforcement. Optimization or reinforcement maximization was not supported as the basic mechanism underlying choice behavior.

[1]  D. Stubbs,et al.  Concurrent responding with fixed relative rate of reinforcement. , 1969, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[2]  T. Schoener.  Theory of Feeding Strategies , 1971 .

[3]  W M Baum,et al.  On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching. , 1974, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[4]  R J Herrnstein,et al.  Formal properties of the matching law. , 1974, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[5]  H. Pulliam.  Diet Optimization with Nutrient Constraints , 1975, The American Naturalist.

[6]  D L Myers,et al.  Undermatching: a reappraisal of performance on concurrent variable-interval schedules of reinforcement. , 1977, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[7]  Barbara Burkhard,et al.  The temporal triangle: Response substitution in instrumental conditioning , 1978 .

[8]  H. Rachlin.  A molar theory of reinforcement schedules. , 1978, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[9]  G M Heyman,et al.  Is matching compatible with reinforcement maximization on concurrent variable interval variable ratio? , 1979, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.