Two Backorder Compensation Mechanisms in Inventory Systems with Impatient Customers

We study a compensation mechanism design problem with customer-choice behavior in a continuous review setting where the production and demand processes are stochastic. When a stockout occurs, the firm controls backorders on the basis of certain compensation policies. Customers make decisions to maximize their utility, which is decreasing in the price, the waiting time, and the customer's impatience factor. We assume that the impatience factor is private information held by the customer only. Two compensation mechanisms are designed to control backorders, namely uniform compensation and priority auction with an admission price. Under uniform compensation, the firm offers the same discount to all customers, whereas under auction compensation, priority is granted according to the customers' bid prices. We obtain the optimal stockout price and base stock level under each mechanism, and analyze the properties of the respective optimal policies. Assuming linear waiting costs with uniformly distributed impatience factor, we find that the auction mechanism (1) maintains a lower base stock level and results in greater profit and (2) benefits customers with relatively lower or higher impatience factors, but customers with a medium impatience factor may be rendered worse off. We further show that both compensation mechanisms are suitable for products with a high unit profit, a high lost sales penalty cost, and a high holding cost

[1]  Leonard Kleinrock,et al.  Optimum Bribing for Queue Position , 1967, Oper. Res..

[2]  P. Naor The Regulation of Queue Size by Levying Tolls , 1969 .

[3]  D. Montgomery,et al.  INVENTORY MODELS WITH A MIXTURE OF BACKORDERS AND LOST SALES. , 1973 .

[4]  D. K. Hildebrand,et al.  Congestion Tolls for Poisson Queuing Processes , 1975 .

[5]  David Rosenberg A new analysis of a lot‐size model with partial backlogging , 1979 .

[6]  Kyung S. Park,et al.  Inventory model with partial backorders , 1982 .

[7]  Haim Mendelson,et al.  Pricing computer services: queueing effects , 1985, CACM.

[8]  Francis T. Lui,et al.  An Equilibrium Queuing Model of Bribery , 1985, Journal of Political Economy.

[9]  Refael Hassin,et al.  A Deterministic Single-Item Inventory Model with Seller Holding Cost and Buyer Holding and Shortage Costs , 1986, Oper. Res..

[10]  Refael Hassin,et al.  Stable priority purchasing in queues , 1986 .

[11]  Haim Mendelson,et al.  Optimal Incentive-Compatible Priority Pricing for the M/M/1 Queue , 1990, Oper. Res..

[12]  Optimal sales to users who hold inventory , 1990 .

[13]  Lode Li The role of inventory in delivery-time competition , 1992 .

[14]  Rafael Hassin Decentralized regulation of a queue , 1995 .

[15]  Richard M. Bradford Pricing, routing, and incentive compatibility in multiserver queues , 1996 .

[16]  Gregory A. DeCroix,et al.  On offering economic incentives to backorder , 1998 .

[17]  Ki Ling Cheung A continuous review inventory model with a time discount , 1998 .

[18]  Konstantina Skouri,et al.  An optimal replenishment policy for deteriorating items with time-varying demand and partial-exponential type - backlogging , 2000, Oper. Res. Lett..

[19]  Prakash L. Abad,et al.  Optimal price and order size for a reseller under partial backordering , 2001, Comput. Oper. Res..

[20]  Rajiv D. Banker,et al.  The Adequacy of Full‐Cost‐Based Pricing Heuristics , 2002 .

[21]  K. Skouri,et al.  An inventory model with deteriorating items, quantity discount, pricing and time-dependent partial backlogging , 2003 .

[22]  M. Utku Ünver,et al.  Course Bidding at Business Schools , 2007 .

[23]  Lawrence M. Wein,et al.  Analysis of a Decentralized Production-Inventory System , 2003, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[24]  Haim Mendelson,et al.  Pricing and Priority Auctions in Queueing Systems with a Generalized Delay Cost Structure , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[25]  Benny Moldovanu,et al.  Priority Auctions and Queue Disciplines That Depend on Processing Time , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[26]  G. Anandalingam,et al.  A New Pricing Model for Competitive Telecommunications Services Using Congestion Discounts , 2005, INFORMS J. Comput..

[27]  Erica L. Plambeck,et al.  The Impact of Duplicate Orders on Demand Estimation and Capacity Investment , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[28]  Juan García-Laguna,et al.  Analysis of an inventory system with exponential partial backordering , 2006 .

[29]  Lawrence M. Wein,et al.  Revenue Management of a Make-to-Stock Queue , 2006, Oper. Res..

[30]  Hemant K. Bhargava,et al.  Stockout Compensation: Joint Inventory and Price Optimization in Electronic Retailing , 2006, INFORMS J. Comput..

[31]  Baris Ata,et al.  Dynamic Control of an M/M/1 Service System with Adjustable Arrival and Service Rates , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[32]  Luis A. San-José,et al.  An economic lot-size model with partial backlogging hinging on waiting time and shortage period , 2007 .

[33]  Pengfei Guo,et al.  Analysis and Comparison of Queues with Different Levels of Delay Information , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[34]  Costis Maglaras,et al.  Dynamic Pricing and Lead-Time Quotation for a Multiclass Make-to-Order Queue , 2008, Manag. Sci..

[35]  Li Chen,et al.  Dynamic Inventory Management with Learning About the Demand Distribution and Substitution Probability , 2008, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[36]  Ajay S. Vinze,et al.  Demand Heterogeneity in IT Infrastructure Services: Modeling and Evaluation of a Dynamic Approach to Defining Service Levels , 2009, Information systems research.

[37]  Xuanming Su,et al.  On the Value of Commitment and Availability Guarantees when Selling to Strategic Consumers , 2008, Manag. Sci..

[38]  Shoshana Anily,et al.  Pricing, replenishment, and timing of selling in a market with heterogeneous customers , 2013 .