A comparative scanning electron microscopic study on degradation of absorbable ligating clips in vivo and in vitro.

Using scanning electron microscopy, the degradation characteristics of two absorbable ligating clips, Absolok (polydioxanone) and Lactomer (poly-L-lactide-co-30%-glycolide) have been studied under in vivo and in vitro conditions. The rate of Absolok clip degradation was significantly greater than that of Lactomer clip degradation both in vitro and in vivo. The rate of degradation of Lactomer clips significantly increased and they showed a greater change in proportion of breakdown in vivo than in vitro compared to Absolok clips. The Absolok clip breakdown began with the formation of surface undulations which later developed into fissures. The undulations appeared on the clip surface as early as 7 days and by 2 weeks developed into fissures. The initial appearance of the fissures was at the edge of the clips particularly at the mating surface. The thickness of layers forming the fissures gradually decreased and by 15 weeks the layers appeared as very thin sheets of materials. The high energy areas (locking and molding points) were more resistant to breakdown and the remains of the clips were still present 25 weeks after initiation of the experiments. The Lactomer clips showed very little sign of degradation in vitro even after 10 weeks of incubation. However, in the in vivo experiments undulations formed on the clip surface as early as 2 weeks postimplantation. These clips also showed fissures similar to those observed on Absolok clips.

[1]  N. Chegini,et al.  Tissue reactions to absorbable ligating clips. , 1988, The Journal of reproductive medicine.

[2]  N. Chegini,et al.  Effects of bacterial infection on absorbable vascular ligating clips. , 1988, The Journal of reproductive medicine.

[3]  N. Chegini,et al.  The use of nylon pouches to prevent cellular attachment to implanted materials. , 1987, Biomaterials.

[4]  P. Klopper,et al.  Performance of sliding knots in monofilament and multifilament suture material , 1986, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[5]  J. V. von Fraunhofer,et al.  Mechanical properties of coated absorbable multifilament suture materials. , 1986, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[6]  J. V. von Fraunhofer,et al.  A comparative study of suture materials: chromic gut and chromic gut treated with glycerin. , 1985, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[7]  N. Chegini,et al.  Morphological and biochemical characterization of small and large bovine luteal cells during pregnancy , 1984, Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology.

[8]  N. Swanson,et al.  Suture Materials, 1980s: Properties, Uses, and Abuses , 1982, International journal of dermatology.

[9]  C. Chu,et al.  The in-vitro degradation of poly(glycolic acid) sutures--effect of pH. , 1981, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[10]  A. Hiltner,et al.  Biodegradation of a poly(α‐amino acid) hydrogel. I. In vivo , 1981 .

[11]  C. Chu An in-vitro study of the effect of buffer on the degradation of poly(glycolic acid) sutures. , 1981, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[12]  Df Williams Some Observations on the Role of Cellular Enzymes in the In-Vivo Degradation of Polymers , 1979 .

[13]  J. Dormandy,et al.  Results of ankle ststolic pressure measurements in patients with intermittent claudication being treated with clofibrate. , 1975, Annals of surgery.

[14]  D. Willigan,et al.  Human tissue reaction to sutures. , 1975 .

[15]  R. Oyasu,et al.  Vicryl (polyglactin 910) synthetic absorbable sutures. , 1974, American journal of surgery.

[16]  J M Brady,et al.  Resorption rate, route, route of elimination, and ultrastructure of the implant site of polylactic acid in the abdominal wall of the rat. , 1973, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[17]  F Leonard,et al.  Biodegradable poly(lactic acid) polymers. , 1971, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[18]  G. Higgins,et al.  Polyglycolic acid sutures. Laboratory and clinical evaluation of a new absorbable suture material. , 1970, Archives of surgery.