Communication in virtual environments: The influence of spatial cues and gender on verbal behavior

Verbal behavior differs in high and low-spatial cue virtual environments.Male and female participants interacted with a confederate in each environment.Text analysis of conversation logs revealed differences by gender and environment.Both factors influenced linguistic metrics, particularly measures of collaboration.Results suggest that spatial cues benefit social connection in virtual environments. As communication technologies continue to evolve, more people will engage in virtual social interactions. With this trend comes an increasing need for research on behavior within virtual worlds. This study contributes to that agenda by focusing on the influence of physical attributes of a virtual setting and gender on verbal behavior expressed by mixed-gender dyads in a virtual world. Computerized text analyses revealed linguistic differences as a function of both the physical and social complexity of virtual settings and gender. The latter differences included both quantitative and qualitative features of written communication. These results add important new discoveries to the literature on virtual psychology and highlight the value of using text analysis tools to investigate virtual interactions.

[1]  Carla J. Groom,et al.  Gender Differences in Language Use: An Analysis of 14,000 Text Samples , 2008 .

[2]  Steve Benford,et al.  A Spatial Model of Interaction in Large Virtual Environments , 1993, ECSCW.

[3]  Leslie Jarmon An Ecology of Embodied Interaction: Pedagogy and homo virtualis , 2009 .

[4]  Saniye Tugba Bulu,et al.  Place presence, social presence, co-presence, and satisfaction in virtual worlds , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[5]  N. Sussman,et al.  Sex and power: gender differences in computer-mediated interactions , 2000 .

[6]  Jeremy N. Bailenson,et al.  The embodiment of sexualized virtual selves: The Proteus effect and experiences of self-objectification via avatars , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[7]  Maria E. Jabon,et al.  The Expression of Personality in Virtual Worlds , 2011 .

[8]  J. Pennebaker,et al.  The Secret Life of Pronouns , 2003, Psychological science.

[9]  Artemio Ramirez, Jr,et al.  When Online Meets Offline: The Effect of Modality Switching on Relational Communication , 2007 .

[10]  Susan R. Fussell,et al.  Using linguistic features to measure presence in computer-mediated communication , 2006, CHI.

[11]  Yair Amichai-Hamburger,et al.  The Social Net: Understanding our online behavior , 2013 .

[12]  Berkant Barla Cambazoglu,et al.  Chat Mining for Gender Prediction , 2006, ADVIS.

[13]  J. Pennebaker,et al.  Psychological aspects of natural language. use: our words, our selves. , 2003, Annual review of psychology.

[14]  Matthew Lombard,et al.  Social and Spatial Presence: An Application to Optimize Human-Computer Interaction , 2010, PsychNology J..

[15]  A. Mulac,et al.  Effects of gender-linked language differences in adults' written discourse: Multivariate tests of language effects , 1994 .

[16]  Maria V. Sanchez-Vives,et al.  From presence to consciousness through virtual reality , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[17]  Eva-Lotta Sallnäs,et al.  Effects of Communication Mode on Social Presence, Virtual Presence, and Performance in Collaborative Virtual Environments , 2005, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[18]  N. Yee The Proteus Paradox: How Online Games and Virtual Worlds Change Us—And How They Don't , 2014 .

[19]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[20]  T. Davenport,et al.  The attention economy: understanding the new currency of business [Book Review] , 2001, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[21]  S. Shyam Sundar,et al.  I feel for my avatar: embodied perception in VEs , 2013, CHI.

[22]  Wijnand A. IJsselsteijn,et al.  Presence: concept, determinants, and measurement , 2000, Electronic Imaging.

[23]  Moon J. Lee,et al.  Do shy people feel less communication apprehension online? The effects of virtual reality on the relationship between personality characteristics and communication outcomes , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[24]  Ralph Schroeder,et al.  Small-Group Behavior in a Virtual and Real Environment: A Comparative Study , 2000, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[25]  Lakshmi Goel,et al.  Predicting users' return to virtual worlds: a social perspective , 2013, Inf. Syst. J..

[26]  Deb Levine,et al.  Virtual Attraction: What Rocks Your Boat , 2000, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..