Response Effects in Polite Cultures: A Test of Acquiescence in Kazakhstan
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] M. Lewis-Beck,et al. The French voter decides , 1994 .
[2] Patrick M. O'Malley,et al. Yea-Saying, Nay-Saying, and Going to Extremes: Black-White Differences in Response Styles , 1984 .
[3] K. Keniston,et al. Yeasayers and naysayers: agreeing response set as a personality variable. , 1960, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.
[4] A. Miller,et al. COMPARING CITIZEN AND ELITE BELIEF SYSTEMS IN POST-SOVIET RUSSIA AND UKRAINE , 1995 .
[5] R. Likert. “Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes, A” , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.
[6] Donald J. Pierce,et al. Democracy in America , 2018, Princeton Readings in Political Thought.
[7] Norbert Schwarz,et al. Response Effects in Surveys , 1987 .
[8] J. Ray. Reviving the problem of acquiescent response bias. , 1983 .
[9] P. Converse. Comment: The Status of Nonattitudes , 1974 .
[10] A. Miller,et al. Political norms in rural Russia: Evidence from public attitudes , 1995 .
[11] Leslie G. Carr,et al. The Srole Items and Acquiescence , 1971 .
[12] M. Jackman. Education and prejudice or education and response-set? , 1973, American sociological review.
[13] H. Clarke,et al. Citizens and Community: Political Support in a Representative Democracy , 1992 .
[14] J. Gibson,et al. Southern Political Science Association Democratic Values and the Transformation of the Soviet Union , 2007 .
[15] Martin Fishbein,et al. Readings in attitude theory and measurement , 1968 .
[16] D. Peabody. Authoritarianism Scales And Response Bias , 1966 .
[17] B. Richardson,et al. Politics in Japan , 1984 .
[18] G. Moran,et al. Double agreement as a function of item ambiguity and susceptibility to demand implications of the psychological situation. , 1967, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[19] A. Arian. Security Threatened: Surveying Israeli Opinion on Peace and War , 1995 .
[20] T. Adorno. The Authoritarian Personality , 1950 .
[21] G. Gleason. The Central Asian States , 1997 .
[22] John C. Leggett,et al. Caste, Class, and Deference in the Research Interview , 1960, American Journal of Sociology.
[23] Catherine E. Ross,et al. Eliminating defense and agreement bias from measures of the sense of control : A 2×2 index , 1991 .
[24] Yehoshua Arieli. Individualism and nationalism in American ideology , 1964 .
[25] R. Inglehart. Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society , 1991 .
[26] H. Cantril,et al. Gauging Public Opinion. , 1944 .
[27] M. Mcclendon,et al. Acquiescence and Recency Response-Order Effects in Interview Surveys , 1991 .
[28] R. Duch. Tolerating Economic Reform: Popular Support for Transition to a Free Market in the Former Soviet Union , 1993, American Political Science Review.
[29] J. Gibson. A Mile Wide But an Inch Deep(?): The Structure of Democratic Commitments in the Former USSR , 1996 .
[30] Leonard G. Rorer. THE GREAT RESPONSE-STYLE MYTH. , 1965 .
[31] J. Krosnick,et al. Attitude intensity, importance, and certainty and susceptibility to response effects. , 1988 .
[32] Wilfred M. Mcclay. The Masterless: Self and Society in Modern America , 1994 .
[33] Dorothy Watson,et al. Correcting for Acquiescent Response Bias in the Absence of a Balanced Scale , 1992 .
[34] R. Putnam,et al. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. , 1994 .
[35] A. Finifter,et al. Redefining the Political System of the USSR: Mass Support for Political Change , 1992, American Political Science Review.
[36] J. Krosnick. Response strategies for coping with the cognitive demands of attitude measures in surveys , 1991 .
[37] Jon A. Krosnick,et al. EDUCATION MODERATES SOME RESPONSE EFFECTS IN ATTITUDE MEASUREMENT , 1996 .
[38] S. Verba,et al. The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations , 1964 .
[39] D. Peabody,et al. Attitude content and agreement set in scales of authoritarianism, dogmatism, anti-semitism, and economic conservatism. , 1961, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.