Response Effects in Polite Cultures: A Test of Acquiescence in Kazakhstan

Some individuals may be predisposed to agree or acquiesce more than others. If the predisposition is cultural, then studies of public attitudes that rely on questions with agree-disagree response sets may mistake response effects for substantive differences among ethnic groups. In this study, the A. reports the results of six experiments in question form conducted on a 1997 nationwide survey of 1,986 adult (age 18+) Kazakhstanis, 47 percent of whom are Kazakh and 34 percent of whom are Russian. Acquiescence bias is found among the entire sample, but it is stronger for ethnic Kazakhs than for ethnic Russians. Acquiescence bias is thus a problem of both question format and individual proclivities. Attitude statements with agree-disagree response sets are less valid measures of public attitudes than balanced questions with forced-choice response alternatives, and their use could cause erroneous inferences about ethnic differences in attitudes.

[1]  M. Lewis-Beck,et al.  The French voter decides , 1994 .

[2]  Patrick M. O'Malley,et al.  Yea-Saying, Nay-Saying, and Going to Extremes: Black-White Differences in Response Styles , 1984 .

[3]  K. Keniston,et al.  Yeasayers and naysayers: agreeing response set as a personality variable. , 1960, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[4]  A. Miller,et al.  COMPARING CITIZEN AND ELITE BELIEF SYSTEMS IN POST-SOVIET RUSSIA AND UKRAINE , 1995 .

[5]  R. Likert.  “Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes, A” , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[6]  Donald J. Pierce,et al.  Democracy in America , 2018, Princeton Readings in Political Thought.

[7]  Norbert Schwarz,et al.  Response Effects in Surveys , 1987 .

[8]  J. Ray.  Reviving the problem of acquiescent response bias. , 1983 .

[9]  P. Converse.  Comment: The Status of Nonattitudes , 1974 .

[10]  A. Miller,et al.  Political norms in rural Russia: Evidence from public attitudes , 1995 .

[11]  Leslie G. Carr,et al.  The Srole Items and Acquiescence , 1971 .

[12]  M. Jackman.  Education and prejudice or education and response-set? , 1973, American sociological review.

[13]  H. Clarke,et al.  Citizens and Community: Political Support in a Representative Democracy , 1992 .

[14]  J. Gibson,et al.  Southern Political Science Association Democratic Values and the Transformation of the Soviet Union , 2007 .

[15]  Martin Fishbein,et al.  Readings in attitude theory and measurement , 1968 .

[16]  D. Peabody.  Authoritarianism Scales And Response Bias , 1966 .

[17]  B. Richardson,et al.  Politics in Japan , 1984 .

[18]  G. Moran,et al.  Double agreement as a function of item ambiguity and susceptibility to demand implications of the psychological situation. , 1967, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[19]  A. Arian.  Security Threatened: Surveying Israeli Opinion on Peace and War , 1995 .

[20]  T. Adorno.  The Authoritarian Personality , 1950 .

[21]  G. Gleason.  The Central Asian States , 1997 .

[22]  John C. Leggett,et al.  Caste, Class, and Deference in the Research Interview , 1960, American Journal of Sociology.

[23]  Catherine E. Ross,et al.  Eliminating defense and agreement bias from measures of the sense of control : A 2×2 index , 1991 .

[24]  Yehoshua Arieli.  Individualism and nationalism in American ideology , 1964 .

[25]  R. Inglehart.  Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society , 1991 .

[26]  H. Cantril,et al.  Gauging Public Opinion. , 1944 .

[27]  M. Mcclendon,et al.  Acquiescence and Recency Response-Order Effects in Interview Surveys , 1991 .

[28]  R. Duch.  Tolerating Economic Reform: Popular Support for Transition to a Free Market in the Former Soviet Union , 1993, American Political Science Review.

[29]  J. Gibson.  A Mile Wide But an Inch Deep(?): The Structure of Democratic Commitments in the Former USSR , 1996 .

[30]  Leonard G. Rorer.  THE GREAT RESPONSE-STYLE MYTH. , 1965 .

[31]  J. Krosnick,et al.  Attitude intensity, importance, and certainty and susceptibility to response effects. , 1988 .

[32]  Wilfred M. Mcclay.  The Masterless: Self and Society in Modern America , 1994 .

[33]  Dorothy Watson,et al.  Correcting for Acquiescent Response Bias in the Absence of a Balanced Scale , 1992 .

[34]  R. Putnam,et al.  Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. , 1994 .

[35]  A. Finifter,et al.  Redefining the Political System of the USSR: Mass Support for Political Change , 1992, American Political Science Review.

[36]  J. Krosnick.  Response strategies for coping with the cognitive demands of attitude measures in surveys , 1991 .

[37]  Jon A. Krosnick,et al.  EDUCATION MODERATES SOME RESPONSE EFFECTS IN ATTITUDE MEASUREMENT , 1996 .

[38]  S. Verba,et al.  The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations , 1964 .

[39]  D. Peabody,et al.  Attitude content and agreement set in scales of authoritarianism, dogmatism, anti-semitism, and economic conservatism. , 1961, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.