Performance and Safety of an Integrated Portable Extracorporeal Life Support System for Adults.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is indicated when conventional measures fail to support a patient during cardiac or respiratory failure. Due to the complicated nature of ECMO, patients often require transport to a tertiary care center. This study retrospectively compared the performance of the Cardiohelp™ (Maquet) life support system with a previously used ECMO circuit when transporting adult patients on venoarterial ECMO between facilities. Two ECMO circuits were compared for performance: 1) the Cardiohelp™ (Maquet) life support system and 2) the "standard" circuit consisting of a Thoratec CentriMag centrifugal pump, Maquet Quadrox-D oxygenator, and a Terumo CDI-500 in-line blood gas analyzer. After analyzing data from 16 patients (eight patients supported with each ECMO system), no differences in patient demographics, percentage of patients successfully weaned from ECMO, percentage of patients surviving to discharge, duration supported on the initial ECMO system, or total duration of ECMO were noted. No patient deaths were related to circuit failure or circuit disruptions in either group. Analysis of the performance of the ECMO circuits and the resulting patient status showed few significant differences between ECMO groups (Cardiohelp™ vs. standard circuit) and time points (the first 8 hours vs. a 24-hour time point). The statistically significant differences were not concerning in terms of appropriate medical support or patient safety. Of interest, the transmembrane pressure was significantly lower for the Cardiohelp™ module vs. the standard oxygenator during the first 8 hours (20.1 [5.3] vs. 37.1 [7.1] mmHg; p < .001) and at 24 hours (21.3 [3.8] vs. 34.8 [7.9] mmHg; p = .001). The Cardiohelp™ portable life support system provides safe and reliable support for adult patients on ECMO during interhospital patient transport as compared to the standard circuit.

[1]  Nicholas R. Teman,et al.  Two decades' experience with interfacility transport on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. , 2014, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[2]  Cory M. Alwardt,et al.  Regional perfusion during venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a case report and educational modules on the concept of dual circulations. , 2013, The journal of extra-corporeal technology.

[3]  R. Thiagarajan,et al.  Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry Report 2012 , 2013, ASAIO journal.

[4]  V. Falk,et al.  Interhospital transfer of seriously sick ARDS patients using veno-venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO): Concept of an ECMO transport team , 2013, International journal of critical illness and injury science.

[5]  R. Roncon-Albuquerque,et al.  Portable miniaturized extracorporeal membrane oxygenation systems for H1N1-related severe acute respiratory distress syndrome: a case series. , 2012, Journal of critical care.

[6]  A. Haneya,et al.  First experience with the new portable extracorporeal membrane oxygenation system Cardiohelp for severe respiratory failure in adults , 2012, Perfusion.

[7]  R. Scott,et al.  A traveling team concept to expedite the transfer and management of unstable patients in cardiopulmonary shock. , 2011, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[8]  B. Graf,et al.  First experience with the ultra compact mobile extracorporeal membrane oxygenation system Cardiohelp in interhospital transport. , 2011, Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery.

[9]  F. Arabía,et al.  Bridge to decision: SWAT team approach used by Mayo Clinic Arizona's cardiac transport team. , 2010, Progress in transplantation.

[10]  Diana Elbourne,et al.  Efficacy and economic assessment of conventional ventilatory support versus extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe adult respiratory failure (CESAR): a multicentre randomised controlled trial , 2009, The Lancet.

[11]  T. Bein,et al.  Efficiency in Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation—Cellular Deposits on Polymethypentene Membranes Increase Resistance to Blood Flow and Reduce Gas Exchange Capacity , 2008, ASAIO journal.

[12]  M. Hendrikx,et al.  Ex vivo evaluation of a new neonatal/infant oxygenator: comparison of the Terumo CAPIOX® Baby RX with Dideco Lilliput 1 and Polystan Safe Micro in the piglet model , 2004, Perfusion.

[13]  R. Graaff,et al.  Pressure drop, shear stress, and activation of leukocytes during cardiopulmonary bypass: a comparison between hollow fiber and flat sheet membrane oxygenators. , 2000, Artificial organs.