Overall genomic pattern is a predictor of outcome in neuroblastoma.

PURPOSE For a comprehensive overview of the genetic alterations of neuroblastoma, their association and clinical significance, we conducted a whole-genome DNA copy number analysis. PATIENTS AND METHODS A series of 493 neuroblastoma (NB) samples was investigated by array-based comparative genomic hybridization in two consecutive steps (224, then 269 patients). RESULTS Genomic analysis identified several types of profiles. Tumors presenting exclusively whole-chromosome copy number variations were associated with excellent survival. No disease-related death was observed in this group. In contrast, tumors with any type of segmental chromosome alterations characterized patients with a high risk of relapse. Patients with both numerical and segmental abnormalities clearly shared the higher risk of relapse of segmental-only patients. In a multivariate analysis, taking into account the genomic profile, but also previously described individual genetic and clinical markers with prognostic significance, the presence of segmental alterations with (HR, 7.3; 95% CI, 3.7 to 14.5; P < .001) or without MYCN amplification (HR, 4.5; 95% CI, 2.4 to 8.4; P < .001) was the strongest predictor of relapse; the other significant variables were age older than 18 months (HR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.2 to 2.8; P = .004) and stage 4 (HR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.2 to 2.7; P = .005). Finally, within tumors showing segmental alterations, stage 4, age, MYCN amplification, 1p and 11q deletions, and 1q gain were independent predictors of decreased overall survival. CONCLUSION The analysis of the overall genomic pattern, which probably unravels particular genomic instability mechanisms rather than the analysis of individual markers, is essential to predict relapse in NB patients. It adds critical prognostic information to conventional markers and should be included in future treatment stratification.

[1]  Single nucleotide polymorphism array analysis to predict clinical outcome in neuroblastoma patients. , 2006, Journal of pediatric surgery.

[2]  M. Meyerson,et al.  Genome-Wide Analysis of Neuroblastomas using High-Density Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Arrays , 2007, PloS one.

[3]  Nitin R. Patel,et al.  ALGORITHM 643: FEXACT: a FORTRAN subroutine for Fisher's exact test on unordered r×c contingency tables , 1986, TOMS.

[4]  O. Delattre,et al.  Combined 24-color karyotyping and comparative genomic hybridization analysis indicates predominant rearrangements of early replicating chromosome regions in neuroblastoma. , 2003, Cancer genetics and cytogenetics.

[5]  A. Look,et al.  Cellular DNA content as a predictor of response to chemotherapy in infants with unresectable neuroblastoma. , 1984, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  M. Jackson,et al.  Comprehensive genetic and histopathologic study reveals three types of neuroblastoma tumors. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  Hiroyuki Shimada,et al.  Chromosome 1p and 11q deletions and outcome in neuroblastoma. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  G. Thomas,et al.  Clinical relevance of loss of heterozygosity of the short arm of chromosome 1 in neuroblastoma: A single‐institution study , 1996, International journal of cancer.

[9]  Rogier Versteeg,et al.  Allelic loss of chromosome 1p as a predictor of unfavorable outcome in patients with neuroblastoma. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  F. Speleman,et al.  Combined M‐FISH and CGH analysis allows comprehensive description of genetic alterations in neuroblastoma cell lines , 2001, Genes, chromosomes & cancer.

[11]  John M Maris,et al.  High-resolution analysis of chromosomal breakpoints and genomic instability identifies PTPRD as a candidate tumor suppressor gene in neuroblastoma. , 2006, Cancer research.

[12]  F. Berthold,et al.  Revisions of the international criteria for neuroblastoma diagnosis, staging and response to treatment. , 1993, Progress in clinical and biological research.

[13]  Frank Speleman,et al.  ArrayCGH‐based classification of neuroblastoma into genomic subgroups , 2007, Genes, chromosomes & cancer.

[14]  Emmanuel Barillot,et al.  Analysis of array CGH data: from signal ratio to gain and loss of DNA regions , 2004, Bioinform..

[15]  A. Kallioniemi CGH microarrays and cancer. , 2008, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[16]  F. Speleman,et al.  Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) analysis of stage 4 neuroblastoma reveals high frequency of 11q deletion in tumors lacking MYCN amplification , 2001, International journal of cancer.

[17]  Calum MacAulay,et al.  High-resolution array CGH increases heterogeneity tolerance in the analysis of clinical samples. , 2005, Genomics.

[18]  Emmanuel Barillot,et al.  BAC array CGH distinguishes mutually exclusive alterations that define clinicogenetic subtypes of gliomas , 2007, International journal of cancer.

[19]  H. Sather,et al.  Association of multiple copies of the N-myc oncogene with rapid progression of neuroblastomas. , 1985, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  Harry Joe,et al.  A remark on algorithm 643: FEXACT: an algorithm for performing Fisher's exact test in r x c contingency tables , 1993, TOMS.

[21]  F. Speleman,et al.  Multicentre analysis of patterns of DNA gains and losses in 204 neuroblastoma tumors: how many genetic subgroups are there? , 2001, Medical and pediatric oncology.

[22]  G. Brodeur Neuroblastoma: biological insights into a clinical enigma , 2003, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[23]  C Caldas,et al.  Cross-platform array comparative genomic hybridization meta-analysis separates hematopoietic and mesenchymal from epithelial tumors , 2007, Oncogene.

[24]  F. Speleman,et al.  High resolution tiling‐path BAC array deletion mapping suggests commonly involved 3p21‐p22 tumor suppressor genes in neuroblastoma and more frequent tumors , 2007, International journal of cancer.

[25]  O. Delattre,et al.  Loss of chromosome 1p may have a prognostic value in localised neuroblastoma: results of the French NBL 90 Study. Neuroblastoma Study Group of the Société Française d'Oncologie Pédiatrique (SFOP). , 1997, European journal of cancer.

[26]  Olivier Delattre,et al.  Two types of chromosome 1p losses with opposite significance in gliomas , 2005, Annals of neurology.

[27]  K. Cole,et al.  Neuroblastomas have distinct genomic DNA profiles that predict clinical phenotype and regional gene expression , 2007, Genes, chromosomes & cancer.

[28]  Michael Baudis,et al.  Unequivocal delineation of clinicogenetic subgroups and development of a new model for improved outcome prediction in neuroblastoma. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[29]  Emmanuel Barillot,et al.  Preferential Occurrence of Chromosome Breakpoints within Early Replicating Regions in Neuroblastoma , 2005, Cell cycle.

[30]  A. Hall,et al.  High-resolution analysis of allelic imbalance in neuroblastoma cell lines by single nucleotide polymorphism arrays. , 2007, Cancer genetics and cytogenetics.

[31]  F. Speleman,et al.  Gain of chromosome arm 17q and adverse outcome in patients with neuroblastoma. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[32]  J Piper,et al.  Optimizing comparative genomic hybridization for analysis of DNA sequence copy number changes in solid tumors , 1994, Genes, chromosomes & cancer.

[33]  K K Matthay,et al.  The International Neuroblastoma Pathology Classification (the Shimada system) , 1999, Cancer.

[34]  O. Delattre,et al.  Chromosomal CGH identifies patients with a higher risk of relapse in neuroblastoma without MYCN amplification , 2007, British Journal of Cancer.

[35]  O. Delattre,et al.  Stepwise occurrence of a complex unbalanced translocation in neuroblastoma leading to insertion of a telomere sequence and late chromosome 17q gain , 2005, Oncogene.

[36]  D Pinkel,et al.  Novel risk stratification of patients with neuroblastoma by genomic signature, which is independent of molecular signature , 2008, Oncogene.

[37]  T. Richmond,et al.  Analysis of chromosome breakpoints in neuroblastoma at sub‐kilobase resolution using fine‐tiling oligonucleotide array CGH , 2005, Genes, chromosomes & cancer.

[38]  Céline Rouveirol,et al.  VAMP: Visualization and analysis of array-CGH, transcriptome and other molecular profiles , 2006, Bioinform..