A joint model for vehicle type and fuel type choice: evidence from a cross-nested logit study

In the face of growing concerns about greenhouse gas emissions, there is increasing interest in forecasting the likely demand for alternative fuel vehicles. This paper presents an analysis carried out on stated preference survey data on California consumer responses to a joint vehicle type choice and fuel type choice experiment. Our study recognises the fact that this choice process potentially involves high correlations that an analyst may not be able to adequately represent in the modelled utility components. We further hypothesise that a cross-nested logit structure can capture more of the correlation patterns than the standard nested logit model structure in such a multi-dimensional choice process. Our empirical analysis and a brief forecasting exercise produce evidence to support these assertions. The implications of these findings extend beyond the context of the demand for alternative fuel vehicles to the analysis of multi-dimensional choice processes in general. Finally, an extension verifies that further gains can be made by using mixed GEV structures, allowing for random heterogeneity in addition to the flexible correlation structures.

[1]  Stephane Hess,et al.  Exploring the potential for cross-nesting structures in airport-choice analysis: A case-study of the Greater London area , 2006 .

[2]  Kenneth E. Train,et al.  Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation , 2016 .

[3]  Daniel McFadden,et al.  Modelling the Choice of Residential Location , 1977 .

[4]  Shlomo Bekhor,et al.  Link-Nested Logit Model of Route Choice: Overcoming Route Overlapping Problem , 1998 .

[5]  Joan L. Walker Extended discrete choice models : integrated framework, flexible error structures, and latent variables , 2001 .

[6]  John L. Bowman,et al.  Logit kernel (or mixed logit) models for large multidimensional choice problems: identification and estimation , 2005 .

[7]  Joan L. Walker Mixed Logit (or Logit Kernel) Model: Dispelling Misconceptions of Identification , 2002 .

[8]  A. Papola Some development on the cross-nested logit model , 2004 .

[9]  D. Hensher,et al.  Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications , 2000 .

[10]  F. Koppelman,et al.  The generalized nested logit model , 2001 .

[11]  J. P. Toner,et al.  A mixed logit model of U.K. household demand for alternative-fuel vehicles. , 2004 .

[12]  J De Dios Ortuzar,et al.  INTERACTIONS AND INDEPENDENCE IN STATED PREFERENCE MODELLING , 1997 .

[13]  D. McFadden Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior , 1972 .

[14]  M. Bierlaire,et al.  Discrete Choice Methods and their Applications to Short Term Travel Decisions , 1999 .

[15]  Andrew Daly,et al.  Simple Approaches for Random Utility Modelling , 2010 .

[16]  Danilo Santini,et al.  Determinants of Alternative Fuel Vehicle Choice in the Continental United States , 1997 .

[17]  John W. Polak,et al.  Capturing taste heterogeneity and correlation structure with mixed GEV models , 2005 .

[18]  Michel Bierlaire,et al.  A theoretical analysis of the cross-nested logit model , 2006, Ann. Oper. Res..

[19]  D. Hensher,et al.  DETERMINANTS of travel choice , 1978 .

[20]  Thomas F Golob FORECASTING ELECTRIC VEHICLE OWNERSHIP AND USE IN THE CALIFORNIA SOUTH COAST AIR BASIN: FINAL REPORT. , 1996 .

[21]  Andrew Daly,et al.  Assuring finite moments for willingness to pay in random coefficient models , 2009 .

[22]  Peter Vovsha,et al.  Application of Cross-Nested Logit Model to Mode Choice in Tel Aviv, Israel, Metropolitan Area , 1997 .

[23]  M. Bierlaire,et al.  ESTIMATION OF VALUE OF TRAVEL-TIME SAVINGS USING MIXED LOGIT MODELS , 2005 .

[24]  David L. Greene,et al.  TAFV Alternative Fuels and Vehicles Choice Model Documentation , 2001 .

[25]  Andrew Daly,et al.  Calculating Errors for Measures Derived from Choice Modeling Estimates , 2012 .

[26]  Ryuichi Kitamura,et al.  Demand for clean-fuel vehicles in California: A discrete-choice stated preference pilot project , 1993 .

[27]  P. Zarembka Frontiers in econometrics , 1973 .

[28]  R. Batley,et al.  Hierarchical elimination-by-aspects and nested logit models of stated preferences for alternative-fuel vehicles , 2003 .

[29]  D A Hensher,et al.  CHOOSING BETWEEN CONVENTIONAL ELECTRIC AND LPG/CNG VEHICLES IN SINGLE-VEHICLE HOUSEHOLDS. IN: TRAVEL BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH. THE LEADING EDGE , 2001 .

[30]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  A copula-based joint multinomial discrete–continuous model of vehicle type choice and miles of travel , 2009 .

[31]  H. Williams On the Formation of Travel Demand Models and Economic Evaluation Measures of User Benefit , 1977 .

[32]  A. Karlqvist,et al.  Spatial interaction theory and planning models , 1978 .

[33]  D. McFadden,et al.  MIXED MNL MODELS FOR DISCRETE RESPONSE , 2000 .