Optimization model for time-varying settlement of renewable energy consumption considering accommodation difficulty and supply–demand interaction

Abstract A renewable portfolio standard (RPS) will be officially implemented in China in 2020 to replace the unsustainable renewable energy (RE) tariff subsidy policy and facilitate the accommodation of RE. The RE accommodation difficulty index, which considers the adequacy of accommodation space and system flexibility, is proposed in this paper. The proposed index aims to reflect the difficulty in RE accommodation at different time intervals during system operation and further motivate the consumption potential of market entities under RPS constraints. Optimization rules and related constraints for the time-varying settlement of RE consumption are designed based on the index. An optimization model of the time-varying settlement of RE consumption for independent system operator (ISO) is established, and the fluctuation of consumption settlement corresponding to per-unit renewable power is performed. Meanwhile, an optimal scheduling model for power retailers under RPS is established to characterize the response behaviors of power retailers to the time-varying settlement of RE consumption. The Nash fitness function is constructed to solve the game equilibrium of the interactive scheduling between ISO and power retailers. An ISO operation plan, a time-varying optimization plan for consumption settlement, and a power consumption strategy for power retailers are obtained. Case study shows that the proposed method can further improve RE accommodation comparing with basic RPS.

[1]  Yi Ding,et al.  An Energy Imbalance Settlement Mechanism Considering Decision-Making Strategy of Retailers Under Renewable Portfolio Standard , 2019, IEEE Access.

[2]  Salvador Pineda,et al.  Renewable-based generation expansion under a green certificate market , 2016 .

[3]  Weiqing Wang,et al.  Dynamic environmental economic dispatch of hybrid renewable energy systems based on tradable green certificates , 2020, Energy.

[4]  Silvano Martello,et al.  Piecewise linear approximation of functions of two variables in MILP models , 2010, Oper. Res. Lett..

[5]  Zhao Xin-gang,et al.  Evolutionary game analysis on the behavior strategies of power producers in renewable portfolio standard , 2018, Energy.

[6]  Zhenzhi Lin,et al.  Bi‐layer portfolio selection model for electricity retailers based on behavioural portfolio theory under quota obligation of RPS , 2020, IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution.

[7]  Qixin Chen,et al.  Modeling Strategic Behaviors of Renewable Energy With Joint Consideration on Energy and Tradable Green Certificate Markets , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[8]  R. Gibbons Game theory for applied economists , 1992 .

[9]  T. Boomsma,et al.  A real options approach to analyse wind energy investments under different support schemes , 2017 .

[10]  Zhao Xin-gang,et al.  From feed-in tariff to renewable portfolio standards: An evolutionary game theory perspective , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[11]  M. Hadi Amini,et al.  A Decentralized Trading Algorithm for an Electricity Market with Generation Uncertainty , 2017, ArXiv.

[12]  Yi-Ming Wei,et al.  Possible design with equity and responsibility in China’s renewable portfolio standards , 2018, Applied Energy.

[13]  Benjamin C. McLellan,et al.  Substitution effect of renewable portfolio standards and renewable energy certificate trading for feed-in tariff , 2017, Applied Energy.

[14]  Zhao Xin-gang,et al.  The development of the renewable energy power industry under feed-in tariff and renewable portfolio standard: A case study of China's wind power industry , 2017 .