Use of Double Bulk Current Injection for Susceptibility Testing of Avionics

In this paper, possible applications of double bulk current injection for susceptibility testing of spacecraft are investigated and discussed. Two test procedures are proposed: one is suitable for system-level (i.e., onboard) testing, the other for unit-level assessment of avionic equipment interconnected by multiwire shielded bundles. By enforcing equivalence between radiation and injection, both procedures are designed to inject expected electromagnetic interference (EMI) levels in the equipment under test (EUT), connected at the terminations of a wiring harness. The procedure for system-level testing requires amplitude and phase control of the radio-frequency power sources used to feed the injection probes. It allows to correlate the susceptibility effects obtained by injection with those due to a nonuniform electromagnetic field (such as the field generated by internal EMI sources in metallic enclosures). It is, therefore, suited for radiated intrasystem verifications. The procedure for unit-level testing exploits equivalence between radiation and injection in terms of the current distribution along the overshield, and applies to bundles with an arbitrary number of inner conductors. In the case of vertical polarization, this procedure allows for the reconstruction of the interference effects produced in the EUT by conventional radiated-susceptibility tests (e.g., DO-160), requiring direct radiation of the system.

[1]  Filippo Marliani,et al.  Double bulk current injection test with amplitude and phase control , 2007, 2007 18th International Zurich Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[2]  M. Klingler,et al.  Double bulk current injection: a new harness setup to correlate immunity test methods , 2003, 2003 IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 2003. EMC '03..

[3]  L. Jung,et al.  Evaluation of measured complex transfer impedances and transfer admittances for the characterization of shield inhomogeneities of multiconductor cables , 1999 .

[4]  T. Kley Electromagnetic coupling to and from shielded cables-optimizing factors , 1992 .

[5]  Christos Christopoulos,et al.  Introduction to Electromagnetic Compatibility , 2007 .

[6]  J. Cruz,et al.  Comparison measurements of currents induced by radiation and injection , 1992 .

[7]  D. Givord,et al.  Discussion of the relevance of transfer admittance and some through elastance measurement results , 1993 .

[8]  G. Spadacini,et al.  Closed-form transmission line model for radiated susceptibility in metallic enclosures , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[9]  N. J. Carter Low cost susceptibility testing , 1993 .

[10]  Ashok K. Agrawal,et al.  Transient Response of Multiconductor Transmission Lines Excited by a Nonuniform Electromagnetic Field , 1980 .

[11]  Reinaldo Perez,et al.  Editorial Special Issue on Aerospace Electromagnetic Compatibility , 2008 .

[12]  P. Narvaez System level EMC testing of spacecraft , 2003 .

[13]  G. Spadacini,et al.  A bulk current injection test conforming to statistical properties of radiation-induced effects , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[14]  Manuel Ramos,et al.  ATV system radiated susceptibility test , 2007, 2007 18th International Zurich Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[15]  S. Pignari,et al.  Theoretical assessment of bulk current injection versus radiation , 1996 .

[16]  K. Javor On field-to-wire coupling versus conducted injection techniques , 1997, 16th DASC. AIAA/IEEE Digital Avionics Systems Conference. Reflections to the Future. Proceedings.

[17]  David A. Hill Currents induced on multiconductor transmission lines by radiation and injection , 1992 .

[18]  E. G. Stevens,et al.  Bulk current injection (BCI): its past, present and future (?) in aerospace , 1996 .

[19]  V. Mariani Primiani,et al.  A comparison of immunity test methods for automotive testing , 2003 .

[20]  Siegfried Klezar Bulk Current Injection (BCI): Road Vehicles-Component Test Methods for Electrical Disturbances from Narrow Band Radiated Electromagnetic Energy , 2005 .

[21]  Kendali Casey,et al.  EMP Coupling Through Cable Shields , 1978, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[22]  F. Grassi,et al.  Circuit Modeling of Injection Probes for Bulk Current Injection , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[23]  Michel F. Sultan Modeling of a Bulk Current Injection Setup for Susceptibility Threshold Measurements , 1986, 1986 IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility.