Bicortical Contact Predicts Subsidence of Modular Tapered Stems in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.

[1]  D. Berry,et al.  Modular Fluted Tapered Stems in Aseptic Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty , 2017, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[2]  A. Gross,et al.  Risk Factors for Subsidence of a Modular Tapered Femoral Stem Used for Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty. , 2015, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[3]  G. Haidukewych,et al.  Results of revision total hip arthroplasty with modular, titanium-tapered femoral stems in severe proximal metaphyseal and diaphyseal bone loss. , 2013, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[4]  A comparison of modular tapered versus modular cylindrical stems for complex femoral revisions. , 2013, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[5]  M. Buttaro,et al.  The use of femoral struts and impacted cancellous bone allograft in patients with severe femoral bone loss who undergo revision total hip replacement: a three- to nine-year follow-up. , 2012, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[6]  Ju-Hong Lee,et al.  A distal fluted, proximal modular femoral prosthesis in revision hip arthroplasty. , 2010, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[7]  S. Overgaard,et al.  Revision total hip arthroplasty using a modular tapered stem with distal fixation: good short-term results in 125 revisions. , 2010, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[8]  H. Willert,et al.  Five- to 10-year results using a noncemented modular revision stem without bone grafting. , 2008, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[9]  Seung-Jae Lim,et al.  Revision total hip arthroplasty using a fluted and tapered modular distal fixation stem with and without extended trochanteric osteotomy. , 2007, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[10]  R. Lehman,et al.  Effect of distal stem geometry on interface motion in uncemented revision total hip prostheses. , 2007, American journal of orthopedics.

[11]  L. Ryd,et al.  Implant Migration after Early Weightbearing in Cementless Hip Replacement , 2005, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[12]  P. Böhm,et al.  The Use of Tapered Stems for Femoral Revision Surgery , 2004, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[13]  E. Morscher,et al.  Three- to 7-year results with the uncemented SL femoral revision prosthesis , 1997, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[14]  S. Sporer,et al.  Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: The Limits of Fully Coated Stems , 2003, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[15]  A. Miller,et al.  A modular distal fixation option for proximal bone loss in revision total hip arthroplasty: a 2- to 6-year follow-up study. , 2003, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[16]  K. Chiu,et al.  Full weight bearing after non-cemented total hip replacement is compatible with satisfactory results , 2003, International Orthopaedics.

[17]  W. Paprosky,et al.  Minimal 11-year follow-up of extensively porous-coated stems in femoral revision total hip arthroplasty. , 2002, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[18]  P. Ochsner,et al.  Wagner SL prosthesis in revision hip arthroplasty to bridge femoral bone defects. Technic and results , 2001 .

[19]  P. Ochsner,et al.  Der Wert der SL-Revisionsprothese nach Wagner zur Überbrückung großer Femurdefekte , 2001, Der Orthopäde.

[20]  W. Paprosky,et al.  Bypass fixation. , 1998, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[21]  P. Sarangi,et al.  Leg Length Discrepancy after Total Hip Replacement , 1997 .

[22]  S. Murphy,et al.  Reconstruction of major segmental loss of the proximal femur in revision total hip arthroplasty. , 1994, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[23]  E. Chao,et al.  Custom-made segmental femoral replacement prosthesis in revision total hip arthroplasty. , 1993, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[24]  C. Engh,et al.  Revision total hip arthroplasty: Long-term results without cement , 1994 .