Quality of Microcalcification Segmentation in Mammograms by Clustering Algorithms

Breast cancer remains a leading cause of death among women worldwide. Mammography is one of the non-invasive methods to find breast tumors, which is very useful in the detection of cancer. Microcalcifications are one of the anomalies of this disease, and these appear as small white spots on the images. Several computer-aided systems (CAD) have been developed for the detection of anomalies related to the disease. However, one of the critical parts is the segmentation process, as the rate of detection of anomalies in the breast by mammography largely depends on this process. In addition, a low detection endangers women’s lives, while a high detection of suspicious elements have excessive cost. Hence, in this work we do a comparative study of segmentation algorithms, specifically three of them derived from the family of c-Means, and we use the NU (Non-Uniformity) measure as a quality indicator of segmentation results. For the study we use 10 images of the MIAS database, and the algorithms are applied to the regions of interest (ROI). Results are interesting, the novel method of sub-segmentation allows continuous and gradual adjustment, which is better adapted to the regions of micro calcification, and this results in smaller NU values. The NU measure can be used as an indication of quality, which depends on the number of pixels and the homogeneity of the segmented regions, although it should be put in the context of the application to avoid making misinterpretations.

[1]  Thomas A. Runkler Ant colony optimization of clustering models , 2005, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[2]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Computer-Aided Detection and Diagnosis in Mammography , 2005 .

[3]  James M. Keller,et al.  Fuzzy Models and Algorithms for Pattern Recognition and Image Processing , 1999 .

[4]  James M. Keller,et al.  A possibilistic fuzzy c-means clustering algorithm , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[5]  J. MacQueen Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations , 1967 .

[6]  D. Andina,et al.  Images sub-segmentation with the PFCM clustering algorithm , 2009, 2009 7th IEEE International Conference on Industrial Informatics.

[7]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Algorithms for Clustering Data , 1988 .

[8]  J. C. Fu,et al.  Image segmentation feature selection and pattern classification for mammographic microcalcifications. , 2005, Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society.

[9]  H. L. Le Roy,et al.  Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability; Vol. IV , 1969 .

[10]  Joachim Dengler,et al.  Segmentation of microcalcifications in mammograms , 1991, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[11]  Y. J. Zhang,et al.  A survey on evaluation methods for image segmentation , 1996, Pattern Recognit..

[12]  James C. Bezdek,et al.  Pattern Recognition with Fuzzy Objective Function Algorithms , 1981, Advanced Applications in Pattern Recognition.

[13]  Jerry L. Prince,et al.  A Survey of Current Methods in Medical Image Segmentation , 1999 .

[14]  J. C. Dunn,et al.  A Fuzzy Relative of the ISODATA Process and Its Use in Detecting Compact Well-Separated Clusters , 1973 .

[15]  Sankar K. Pal,et al.  A review on image segmentation techniques , 1993, Pattern Recognit..

[16]  Yongyi Yang,et al.  Computer-Aided Detection and Diagnosis of Breast Cancer With Mammography: Recent Advances , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[17]  Jerry L Prince,et al.  Current methods in medical image segmentation. , 2000, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[18]  Angelo Chianese,et al.  Computer aided detection of microcalcifications in digital mammograms , 2000, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[19]  Hugo Terashima-Marín,et al.  Evolutionary Neural Networks Applied To The Classification Of Microcalcification Clusters In Digital Mammograms , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation.

[20]  A. Laine,et al.  Potential of Computer-Aided Diagnosis to Improve CT Lung Cancer Screening , 2009, IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering.

[21]  Jerry D. Gibson,et al.  Handbook of Image and Video Processing , 2000 .