Government communication effectiveness on local acceptance of nuclear power: Evidence from China

[1]  Tsuyoshi Oshita.  The Effects of Emergency Preparedness Communication on People’s Trust, Emotions, and Acceptance of a Nuclear Power Plant , 2019 .

[2]  D. Pevec,et al.  Promises and limitations of nuclear fission energy in combating climate change , 2018, Energy Policy.

[3]  W. Louis,et al.  Company-community dialogue builds relationships, fairness, and trust leading to social acceptance of Australian mining developments , 2018 .

[4]  K. Menrad,et al.  Factors influencing citizens’ acceptance and non-acceptance of wind energy in Germany , 2018 .

[5]  Xueliang Yuan,et al.  How would social acceptance affect nuclear power development? A study from China , 2017 .

[6]  Jiwoong Lee,et al.  Analyzing the Impact of Nuclear Power on CO 2 Emissions , 2017 .

[7]  Evert Vedung,et al.  The Sermon: Information Programs in the Public Policy Process—Choice, Effects, and Evaluation , 2017 .

[8]  A. Ho,et al.  Government Communication Effectiveness and Satisfaction with Police Performance: A Large‐Scale Survey Study , 2017 .

[9]  E. Hobman,et al.  Willingness to participate in direct load control: The role of consumer distrust , 2017 .

[10]  D. Arlt,et al.  Fukushima effects in Germany? Changes in media coverage and public opinion on nuclear power , 2016, Public understanding of science.

[11]  James W. Stoutenborough,et al.  The role of scientific knowledge in the public's perceptions of energy technology risks , 2016 .

[12]  Xian Zhang,et al.  A large national survey of public perceptions of CCS technology in China , 2015 .

[13]  Amy M. V. King,et al.  The China Syndrome? Nuclear Power Growth and Safety After Fukushima , 2015 .

[14]  Tomoki Takahashi,et al.  Inclusive environmental impact assessment indices with consideration of public acceptance: Application to power generation technologies in Japan , 2015 .

[15]  Genia Kostka.  Command Without Control: The Case of China's Environmental Target System , 2015 .

[16]  K. Gottfried,et al.  Climate Change and Nuclear Power , 2014 .

[17]  Wonjoon Kim,et al.  An international comparative analysis of public acceptance of nuclear energy , 2014 .

[18]  A. Vedlitz,et al.  The effect of perceived and assessed knowledge of climate change on public policy concerns: An empirical comparison , 2014 .

[19]  Jung-Der Wang,et al.  Risk perception, trust, and factors related to a planned new nuclear power plant in Taiwan after the 2011 Fukushima disaster , 2013, Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection.

[20]  Yang Liu,et al.  Effect of the Fukushima nuclear accident on the risk perception of residents near a nuclear power plant in China , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  James W. Stoutenborough,et al.  Knowledge, risk, and policy support: Public perceptions of nuclear power , 2013 .

[22]  Mike S. Schäfer,et al.  Public climate-change skepticism, energy preferences and political participation , 2013 .

[23]  Wonjoon Kim,et al.  Effect of the Fukushima nuclear disaster on global public acceptance of nuclear energy , 2013 .

[24]  A. Mol,et al.  Public participation and trust in nuclear power development in China , 2013 .

[25]  Michael Siegrist,et al.  How a Nuclear Power Plant Accident Influences Acceptance of Nuclear Power: Results of a Longitudinal Study Before and After the Fukushima Disaster , 2013, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[26]  Ying Zhu,et al.  Rule of Law with Chinese Characteristics: The Role of Campaigns in Lawmaking , 2012 .

[27]  J. Horsley,et al.  Overcoming Negative Media Coverage: Does Government Communication Matter? , 2012 .

[28]  S. Pandey,et al.  Further Dissecting the Black Box of Citizen Participation: When Does Citizen Involvement Lead to Good Outcomes? , 2011 .

[29]  A. Froggatt,et al.  The Global Status of the Nuclear Industry and its Opportunities for Expansion , 2011 .

[30]  M. Ramana.  Nuclear power and the public , 2011 .

[31]  Michael Siegrist,et al.  Climate change benefits and energy supply benefits as determinants of acceptance of nuclear power stations: Investigating an explanatory model , 2011 .

[32]  Nicholas Apergis,et al.  On the causal dynamics between emissions, nuclear energy, renewable energy, and economic growth ☆ , 2010 .

[33]  Linda Steg,et al.  Morality and Nuclear Energy: Perceptions of Risks and Benefits, Personal Norms, and Willingness to Take Action Related to Nuclear Energy , 2010, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[34]  Yemane Wolde-Rufael,et al.  CO2 emissions, nuclear energy, renewable energy and economic growth in the US , 2010 .

[35]  J. McBeath,et al.  Environmental Change and Food Security in China , 2010 .

[36]  Ø. Ihlen,et al.  Government communication about potential policies: Public relations, propaganda or both , 2010 .

[37]  Jonathan Craft,et al.  Government communication and democratic governance: Electoral and policy-related information campaigns in Canada , 2010 .

[38]  Michael Greenberg,et al.  Energy sources, public policy, and public preferences: Analysis of US national and site-specific data , 2009 .

[39]  Michael Howlett,et al.  Government Communication as a Policy Tool: A Framework for Analysis , 2009, Canadian Political Science Review.

[40]  Thomas Dietz,et al.  The Future of Nuclear Power: Value Orientations and Risk Perception , 2009, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[41]  Kurt Kleiner,et al.  Nuclear energy: assessing the emissions , 2008 .

[42]  Diane Farseta.  The campaign to sell nuclear , 2008 .

[43]  D. Farsetta.  The campaign to sell nuclear , 2008 .

[44]  James L. Garnett,et al.  Penetrating the Performance Predicament: Communication as a Mediator or Moderator of Organizational Culture’s Impact on Public Organizational Performance , 2008 .

[45]  L. Comfort.  Crisis Management in Hindsight: Cognition, Communication, Coordination, and Control , 2007 .

[46]  Alexander Kouzmin,et al.  Communicating throughout Katrina: Competing and Complementary Conceptual Lenses on Crisis Communication , 2007 .

[47]  Brad L. Rawlins,et al.  Transparency in government communication , 2007 .

[48]  Naim Kapucu,et al.  Public Complacency under Repeated Emergency Threats: Some Empirical Evidence , 2006 .

[49]  B. Rooij.  Regulating land and pollution in China : lawmaking, compliance, and enforcement : theory and cases , 2006 .

[50]  Michael Howlett,et al.  Managing the “hollow state”: procedural policy instruments and modern governance , 2000 .

[51]  W. Rüdig.  Phasing out nuclear energy in Germany , 2000 .

[52]  M. Siegrist,et al.  Perception of Hazards: The Role of Social Trust and Knowledge , 2000, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[53]  M. Siegrist,et al.  Salient Value Similarity, Social Trust, and Risk/Benefit Perception , 2000, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[54]  J. Durant.  Participatory technology assessment and the democratic model of the public understanding of science , 1999 .

[55]  Jerry B. Brown,et al.  Profiles in Power: The Antinuclear Movement and the Dawn of the Solar Age , 1997 .

[56]  J. Durant,et al.  The relationship between knowledge and attitudes in the public understanding of science in Britain , 1995 .

[57]  Mary Tschirhart,et al.  Public information campaigns as policy instruments , 1994 .

[58]  A. Gross.  The roles of rhetoric in the public understanding of science , 1994 .

[59]  Brian Wynne,et al.  Misunderstood misunderstanding: social identities and public uptake of science , 1992 .

[60]  B. Wynne.  Knowledges in Context , 1991 .

[61]  John Ziman,et al.  Public Understanding of Science , 1991 .

[62]  W. Gamson,et al.  Media Discourse and Public Opinion on Nuclear Power: A Constructionist Approach , 1989, American Journal of Sociology.

[63]  Herbert Kitschelt,et al.  Political Opportunity Structures and Political Protest: Anti-Nuclear Movements in Four Democracies , 1986, British Journal of Political Science.

[64]  D. Rubin,et al.  The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects , 1983 .

[65]  M. Whyte.  The status of women in preindustrial societies , 1979 .

[66]  H. J. Otway,et al.  Nuclear power: The question of public acceptance , 1978 .

[67]  William Evans,et al.  Public understanding of science , 2020, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Higher Education.

[68]  Morten Jakobsen,et al.  Policy Positions of Bureaucrats at the Front Lines: Are They Susceptible to Strategic Communication? , 2017 .

[69]  Yue Guo,et al.  When it is unfamiliar to me: Local acceptance of planned nuclear power plants in China in the post-fukushima era , 2017 .

[70]  N. N. Liu,et al.  Campaign‐Style Enforcement and Regulatory Compliance , 2015 .

[71]  D. Zeidler.  Global sustainability and public understanding of science: The role of socioscientific issues in the international community , 2011 .

[72]  T. V. Paul.  The tradition of non-use of nuclear weapons , 2009 .

[73]  M. Siegrist,et al.  Trust, risk perception and the TCC model of cooperation , 2007 .

[74]  Mark Diesendorf,et al.  Is nuclear energy a possible solution to global warming?: [Paper in: The Nuclear Debate Re-visited. Eddy, Elizabeth (ed.).] , 2007 .

[75]  A. Piebalgs.  Green paper: A European strategy for sustainable, competitive and secure energy , 2006 .

[76]  J. Falk.  Global fission: The battle over nuclear power , 1982 .