Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) round robin benchmark for a pressurized water reactor (PWR) rod bundle

Abstract This study examined the capabilities and limitations of steady Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) approach for pressurized water reactor (PWR) rod bundle problems, based on the round robin benchmark of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) codes against the NESTOR experiment for a 5 × 5 rod bundle with typical split-type mixing vane grids (MVGs). The round robin exercise against the high-fidelity, broad-range (covering multi-spans and entire lateral domain) NESTOR experimental data for both the flow field and the rod temperatures enabled us to obtain important insights into CFD prediction and validation for the split-type MVG PWR rod bundle problem. It was found that the steady RANS turbulence models with wall function could reasonably predict two key variables for a rod bundle problem – grid span pressure loss and the rod surface temperature – once mesh (type, resolution, and configuration) was suitable and conjugate heat transfer was properly considered. However, they over-predicted the magnitude of the circumferential variation of the rod surface temperature and could not capture its peak azimuthal locations for a central rod in the wake of the MVG. These discrepancies in the rod surface temperature were probably because the steady RANS approach could not capture unsteady, large-scale cross-flow fluctuations and qualitative cross-flow pattern change due to the laterally confined test section. Based on this benchmarking study, lessons and recommendations about experimental methods as well as CFD methods were also provided for the future research.

[1]  D. E. Beasley,et al.  Mapping of the Lateral Flow Field in Typical Subchannels of a Support Grid With Vanes , 2003 .

[2]  Michael E. Conner,et al.  The Effect of Support Grid Design on Azimuthal Variation in Heat Transfer Coefficient for Rod Bundles , 2005 .

[3]  Moon Ki Chung,et al.  Turbulent flow through spacer grids in rod bundles , 1998 .

[4]  Sofiane Benhamadouche.  On the use of (U)RANS and LES approaches for turbulent incompressible single phase flows in nuclear engineering applications , 2017 .

[5]  Yassin A. Hassan,et al.  Experimental study of a simplified 3 × 3 rod bundle using DPTV , 2014 .

[6]  M. Boucker,et al.  A Second-Order Turbulence Model Based on a Reynolds Stress Approach for Two-Phase Flow—Part I: Adiabatic Cases , 2009 .

[7]  Hisashi Ninokata,et al.  CFD and DNS methodologies development for fuel bundle simulations , 2006 .

[8]  Jeff Deshon,et al.  Fuel R & D to Improve Fuel Reliability , 2006 .

[9]  D. E. Beasley,et al.  Development of Swirling Flow in a Rod Bundle Subchannel , 2002 .

[10]  Yassin A. Hassan,et al.  Hydraulic Benchmark Data for PWR Mixing Vane Grid , 2013 .

[11]  Yassin A. Hassan,et al.  Experimental benchmark data for PWR rod bundle with spacer-grids , 2012 .

[12]  B. Launder,et al.  Progress in the development of a Reynolds-stress turbulence closure , 1975, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[13]  B. Launder,et al.  Ground effects on pressure fluctuations in the atmospheric boundary layer , 1978, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[14]  T. Gatski,et al.  Modelling the pressure–strain correlation of turbulence: an invariant dynamical systems approach , 1991, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[15]  Emilio Baglietto,et al.  CFD methodology and validation for single-phase flow in PWR fuel assemblies , 2010 .

[16]  Chul-Hwa Song,et al.  Turbulent mixing in a rod bundle with vaned spacer grids: OECD/NEA–KAERI CFD benchmark exercise test , 2014 .

[17]  Jungwoo Kim,et al.  Synthesis of the turbulent mixing in a rod bundle with vaned spacer grids based on the OECD-KAERI CFD benchmark exercise , 2014 .

[18]  Yue Fen Shen,et al.  An investigation of crossflow mixing effect caused by grid spacer with mixing blades in a rod bundle , 1991 .

[19]  Young Don Choi,et al.  Comparison of thermo-hydraulic performances of large scale vortex flow (LSVF) and small scale vortex flow (SSVF) mixing vanes in 17 × 17 nuclear rod bundle , 2007 .

[20]  Viriato Semiao,et al.  A new second‐moment closure approach for turbulent swirling confined flows , 2003 .

[21]  Stefan Wallin,et al.  Explicit algebraic Reynolds stress and non-linear eddy-viscosity models , 2009 .

[22]  Michael E. Conner,et al.  Single-phase convective heat transfer in rod bundles , 2008 .

[23]  T. B. Gatski,et al.  Nonlinear eddy viscosity and algebraic stress models for solving complex turbulent flows , 2000 .

[24]  Arto Tapio Ylönen.  High-resolution flow structure measurements in a rod bundle , 2013 .

[25]  D. Wilcox.  Turbulence modeling for CFD , 1993 .

[26]  Kazuo Ikeda,et al.  Flow Characteristics in Spacer Grids Measured by Rod-embedded Fiber Laser Doppler Velocimetry , 2007 .

[27]  Yassin A. Hassan,et al.  RANS modeling for flow in nuclear fuel bundle in pressurized water reactors (PWR) , 2011 .

[28]  U. Bieder,et al.  CFD analysis of the flow in the near wake of a generic PWR mixing grid , 2015 .

[29]  Yassin A. Hassan,et al.  Non-intrusive experimental investigation of flow behavior inside a 5 × 5 rod bundle with spacer grids using PIV and MIR , 2009 .

[30]  D. E. Beasley,et al.  The effect of support grid features on local, single-phase heat transfer measurements in rod bundles , 2004 .

[31]  Wang Kee In.  Numerical Study of Coolant Mixing Caused by the Flow Deflectors in a Nuclear Fuel Bundle , 2001 .

[32]  U. Bieder,et al.  LES analysis of the flow in a simplified PWR assembly with mixing grid , 2014 .

[33]  Emilio Baglietto.  Anisotropic Turbulence Modeling for Accurate Rod Bundle Simulations , 2006 .