The World as a Process

Simulation techniques, especially those implemented on a computer, are frequently employed in natural as well as in social sciences with considerable success. There is mounting evidence that the “model-building era” (J. Niehans) that dominated the theoretical activities of the sciences for a long time is about to be succeeded or at least lastingly supplemented by the “simulation era” . But what exactly are models? What is a simulation and what is the difference and the relation between a model and a simulation? These are some of the questions addressed in this article. I maintain that the most significant feature of a simulation is that it allows scientists to imitate one process by another process. “Process” here refers solely to a temporal sequence of states of a system. Given the observation that processes are dealt with by all sorts of scientists, it is apparent that simulations prove to be a powerful interdisciplinarily acknowledged tool. Accordingly, simulations are best suited to investigate the various research strategies in different sciences more carefully. To this end, I focus on the function of simulations in the research process. Finally, a somewhat detailed case-study from nuclear physics is presented which, in my view, illustrates elements of a typical simulation in physics.

[1]  Hans Lind,et al.  A Note on Fundamental Theory and Idealizations in Economics and Physics , 1993, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[2]  V. Koch,et al.  Transport-theoretical analysis of relativistic heavy-ion collisions , 1993 .

[3]  Randall L. Schultz,et al.  Simulation in social and administrative science : overviews and case-examples , 1972 .

[4]  H. Simon,et al.  Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization. , 1959 .

[5]  Mario Bunge,et al.  Scientific Research II , 1967 .

[6]  Achim Weiss,et al.  Stellar Structure and Evolution , 1990 .

[7]  Stephen Wolfram,et al.  Cellular Automata And Complexity , 1994 .

[8]  M. Eigen,et al.  The Hypercycle: A principle of natural self-organization , 2009 .

[9]  Mark Blaug,et al.  Appraising Economic Theories , 1991 .

[10]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[11]  W. Arthur,et al.  The Economy as an Evolving Complex System II , 1988 .

[12]  Harry H. Landreth,et al.  History of Economic Thought , 1993 .

[13]  W. Mays,et al.  Process and Reality , 1978 .

[14]  Harvey Gould,et al.  Computer simulations , 1990 .

[15]  Raymond T. Grontkowski Concepts of Science , 1970 .

[16]  Mario Bunge Analogy, Simulation, Representation , 1973 .

[17]  I. Hacking,et al.  Representing and Intervening. , 1986 .

[18]  V. Barger,et al.  Physics simulations at high energy , 1987 .

[19]  R. Carnap Foundations of Logic and Mathematics , 1937 .

[20]  Ernest Nagel,et al.  The Structure of Science , 1962 .

[21]  Fritz Rohrlich,et al.  Computer Simulation in the Physical Sciences , 1990, PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association.

[22]  Baron Kelvin William Thomson Notes of Lectures on Molecular Dynamics and the Wave Theory of Light , 1884 .

[23]  A. Whitehead Process and reality : an essay in cosmology , 1978 .

[24]  Stephen Toulmin,et al.  THE PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE. An Introduction. , 1967 .

[25]  I. Hacking,et al.  How Experiments End , 1989 .

[26]  Margaret G. Hermann,et al.  An Attempt to Simulate the Outbreak of World War I , 1967, American Political Science Review.

[27]  M. Bunge Method, Model, And Matter , 1972 .

[28]  M. Redhead,et al.  How the Laws of Physics Lie. , 1984 .

[29]  Stephan Hartmann,et al.  Models as a Tool for Theory Construction: Some Strategies of Preliminary Physics , 1995 .

[30]  Nancy Cartwright,et al.  The tool box of science: Tools for the building of models with a superconductivity example , 1995 .

[31]  Peter Achinstein,et al.  Observation, experiment, and hypothesis in modern physical science , 1986 .

[32]  L. Taylor,et al.  The Neglect of Experiment , 1986 .

[33]  V. Smith Economics in the Laboratory , 1994 .

[34]  M. Redhead Models in Physics* , 1980, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[35]  Mary Hesse,et al.  Models and analogies in science , 1970 .

[36]  J. Barrow,et al.  The Anthropic Cosmological Principle , 1987 .

[37]  Ronald Laymon,et al.  Computer Simulations, Idealizations and Approximations , 1990, PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association.